Quality of transmission estimation in WDM and elastic optical networks accounting for space–spectrum dependencies

We develop a framework for estimating the quality of transmission (QoT) of a new lightpath before it is established, as well as for calculating the expected degradation it will cause to existing lightpaths. The framework correlates the QoT metrics of established lightpaths, which are readily available from coherent optical receivers that can be extended to serve as optical performance monitors. Past similar studies used only space (routing) information and thus neglected spectrum, while they focused on old-generation noncoherent networks. The proposed framework accounts for correlation in both the space and spectrum domains and can be applied to both fixed-grid wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) and elastic optical networks. It is based on a graph transformation that exposes and models the interference between spectrum-neighboring channels. Our results indicate that our QoT estimates are very close to the actual performance data, that is, to having perfect knowledge of the physical layer. The proposed estimation framework is shown to provide up to 4 × 10-2 lower pre-forward error correction bit error ratio (BER) compared to the worst-case interference scenario,which overestimates the BER. The higher accuracy can be harvested when lightpaths are provisioned with low margins; our results showed up to 47% reduction in required regenerators, a substantial savings in equipment cost.

[1]  I. Tomkos,et al.  Optimized Monitor Placement for Accurate QoT Assessment in Core Optical Networks , 2012, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[2]  H. Avramopoulos,et al.  ORCHESTRA - Optical performance monitoring enabling flexible networking , 2015, 2015 17th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON).

[3]  P. Poggiolini The GN Model of Non-Linear Propagation in Uncompensated Coherent Optical Systems , 2012, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[4]  Masahiko Jinno,et al.  Elastic optical networking: a new dawn for the optical layer? , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Yvan Pointurier,et al.  Design of low-margin optical networks , 2017, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[6]  J.-L Auge Can we use flexible transponders to reduce margins? , 2013, 2013 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (OFC/NFOEC).

[7]  K. Christodoulopoulos,et al.  Estimating QoT of unestablished lightpaths , 2016, 2016 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[8]  Mark Crovella,et al.  Network Kriging , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[9]  Alberto Bononi,et al.  Regeneration savings in flexible optical networks with a new load-aware reach maximization , 2016, Opt. Switch. Netw..

[10]  P. Poggiolini,et al.  A Detailed Analytical Derivation of the GN Model of Non-Linear Interference in Coherent Optical Transmission Systems , 2012, 1209.0394.

[11]  Subrat Kar,et al.  Effect of frequency granularity and Link Margin at 100G and beyond Flexgrid Optical Networks , 2014, 2014 Twentieth National Conference on Communications (NCC).

[12]  Michael Rabbat,et al.  Cross-Layer Monitoring in Transparent Optical Networks , 2011, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[13]  Emmanouel A. Varvarigos,et al.  Considering physical layer impairments in offline RWA , 2009, IEEE Network.

[14]  Filippo Cugini,et al.  Toward Plug-and-Play Software-Defined Elastic Optical Networks , 2016, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[15]  N Sambo,et al.  Lightpath Establishment Assisted by Offline QoT Estimation in Transparent Optical Networks , 2010, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.