Precision of shoulder anatomical landmark calibration by two approaches: a CAST-like protocol and a new anatomical palpator method.

The objective of the study was to compare the precision of shoulder anatomical landmark palpation using a CAST-like method and a newly developed anatomical palpator device (called A-Palp) using the forefinger pulp directly. The repeated-measures experimental design included four examiners that twice repeated measurements on eleven scapula and humerus anatomical landmarks during two sessions. Inter-session and inter-examiner precision was determined on volunteers. A-Palp accuracy was obtained from in vitro measurements and using virtual palpation on 3D bone models. Error propagation on the motion representation was also analyzed for a continuous motion of abduction movement performed in the shoulder joint. Palpation results showed that CAST and A-Palp methods lead to similar precision with the Maximal A-Palp calibration error being 1.5mm. In vivo precision of the CAST and A-Palp methods varied between 4mm (inter-session) and 8mm (inter-examiner). Mean propagation of the palpation error on the motion graph representation was 2 degrees and 5 degrees for scapula and humerus, respectively. A-Palp accuracy was 3.6 and 8.1mm for scapula and humerus, respectively. The A-Palp seems promising and could probably become an additional method next to today's marker-based motion analysis systems (i.e., Helen-Hayes configuration, CAST method).

[1]  Serge Van Sint Jan,et al.  Identifying the location of human skeletal landmarks: why standardized definitions are necessary--a proposal. , 2005, Clinical Biomechanics.

[2]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  K Manal,et al.  The accuracy of estimating proximal tibial translation during natural cadence walking: bone vs. skin mounted targets. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  S. Jan Introducing Anatomical and Physiological Accuracy in Computerized Anthropometry for Increasing the Clinical Usefulness of Modeling Systems , 2005 .

[6]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  E Roux,et al.  Evaluation of the global optimisation method within the upper limb kinematics analysis. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  S. Jan Color Atlas of Skeletal landmark definitions. Guidelines for reproducible manual and virtual palpations. , 2007 .

[9]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  Enhanced anatomical calibration in human movement analysis. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[10]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  F C van der Helm,et al.  In vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint rotation center from scapular bony landmarks by linear regression. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Victor Sholukha,et al.  In vivo registration of both electrogoniometry and medical imaging: development and application on the ankle joint complex , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Lorenzo Chiari,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[14]  J. D. de Groot,et al.  The variability of shoulder motions recorded by means of palpation. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  J. G. Bonnin The Shoulder Girdle , 1951 .

[16]  U.D. Croce,et al.  Surface-marker cluster design criteria for 3-D bone movement reconstruction , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  I Söderkvist,et al.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  M. Eliasziw,et al.  Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[19]  Gijs Pronk The shoulder girdle, analysed and modelled kinematically , 1991 .

[20]  Laurence Chèze,et al.  Rotation sequence as an important factor in shoulder kinematics. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Pelvis and lower limb anatomical landmark calibration precision and its propagation to bone geometry and joint angles , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[22]  R. Müller,et al.  A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  Victor Sholukha,et al.  Three-dimensional shoulder kinematics by optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry , 2006 .

[24]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[25]  Joyce P Trost,et al.  Measurement and management of errors in quantitative gait data. , 2004, Gait & posture.