Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy.

Preoperative evaluation for a total shoulder arthroplasty includes 2-dimensional analysis of the glenoid through either standard radiographs or computed tomography (CT) images. Recent evidence suggests that these 2-dimensional images may actually misrepresent the 3-dimensional (3D) anatomy of the glenoid. Because 3D reconstructions of CT images allow 3D visualization and analysis of the scapula as a free body, we hypothesized that they can reflect the true anatomy of the glenoid more accurately. To test this hypothesis, we obtained various glenoid morphometric measurements from excised cadaveric scapulae as well as their respective 3D CT images. On average, the glenoid version angles measured from the 3D CT images were within 1.0 degrees +/- 0.7 degrees (mean +/- SD) of those from the actual specimen (95% confidence limit, <2.2 degrees for all observers). These measurements from the 3D CT images showed high interobserver and intraobserver reliability (interobserver and intraobserver correlation coefficients, 0.983 and 0.978, respectively). Similarly, measured glenoid surface width and length from the 3D CT images were within 1.8 +/- 1.2 mm and 1.4 +/- 1.1 mm, respectively, of those from the actual specimen. In addition, we were able to estimate the glenoid surface area as well as the glenoid vault volume from the 3D CT images. These values were 8.67 +/- 2.73 cm2 and 11.86 +/- 5.06 cm3, respectively. The mean glenoid vault volume with respect to its surface area was 1.35 +/- 0.24 cm3/cm2 (range, 1.06-1.91 cm3/cm2). These data suggest that 3D CT images can accurately reflect the true anatomy of the glenoid and that they can provide valuable information regarding the glenoid surface and vault. As such, 3D CT images may prove to be a useful tool during the preoperative evaluation for a total shoulder arthroplasty, particularly in patients with significant glenoid bone loss.

[1]  F A Matsen,et al.  Intrinsic stability of unused and retrieved polyethylene glenoid components. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  R. Friedman,et al.  The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  J. Brems,et al.  The glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 1993, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[4]  J. Iannotti,et al.  The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[5]  P. Vuagnat,et al.  Humeral retrotorsion and glenohumeral relationship in the normal shoulder and in recurrent anterior dislocation (scapulometry). , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  R. Darmana,et al.  In vivo characterization of glenoid with use of computed tomography. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[7]  R. Churchill,et al.  Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  G. Hazan,et al.  Variability of measurement of glenoid version on computed tomography scan. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[9]  J. Iannotti,et al.  The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  B. J. Brewer,et al.  Excessive retroversion of the glenoid cavity. A cause of non-traumatic posterior instability of the shoulder. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.