Surface roughness: a key parameter in pavement interface design

Abstract The mechanical behaviour of the first interface under a surface layer is critical to pavement durability. Several of the distresses observed are mainly due to traffic loading or repetitive loading; they may also be related to the tack coat, which is often used to bond both layers, as well as to the application rate, curing time and cleanliness. The roughness effect however has not been heavily emphasised in pavement design. Out of such concerns, the interface model proposed in this paper makes use of a meso- and macro-scale cohesive zone model, thus making it possible to take into account roughness and damage behaviour of the interface in either pure or mixed mode. The objective of this study is to propose an innovative method to identify these model parameters during in situ operations for practical engineering perspective. In this paper, an Interface Damage Model is analysed at the meso-scale with the actual roughness and idealised periodic roughness profiles. The parametric numerical analysis performed clearly shows the influence of roughness of these structures in shear mode. Moreover, a macro-scale interface damage model, which includes roughness as an internal variable, is proposed for pavement structures with smooth interfaces

[1]  Armelle Chabot,et al.  A Four-Point Bending Test for the Bonding Evaluation of Composite Pavement , 2012 .

[2]  Fouad Zaittouni,et al.  Asymptotic modelling of interfaces taking contact conditions into account: Asymptotic expansions and numerical implementation , 2010 .

[3]  Olivier Allix,et al.  A delay damage mesomodel of laminates under dynamic loading: basic aspects and identification issues , 2003 .

[4]  E. Sacco,et al.  A mixed-mode cohesive-zone model accounting for finite dilation and asperity degradation , 2015 .

[5]  C. Petit,et al.  Experimental investigation of tack coat fatigue performance: Towards an improved lifetime assessment of pavement structure interfaces , 2011 .

[6]  Antonio D’Andrea,et al.  Interface Roughness Parameters and Shear Strength , 2013 .

[7]  Alberto Corigliano,et al.  Damage analysis of interlaminar fracture specimens , 1995 .

[8]  Cyril Breque,et al.  Calibration of a structured-light projection system: Development to large dimension objects , 2012 .

[9]  J-C Roffe,et al.  CHARACTERISATION TESTS ON BOND COATS: WORLDWIDE STUDY, IMPACT, TESTS, RECOMMENDATIONS , 2002 .

[10]  Gilda Ferrotti,et al.  Shear and flexural characterization of grid-reinforced asphalt pavements and relation with field distress evolution , 2015 .

[11]  Frédéric Lebon,et al.  Multiscale modeling of imperfect interfaces and applications , 2015 .

[12]  Adnan Ibrahimbegovic,et al.  Computational Methods for Solids and Fluids , 2016 .

[13]  Manfred N. Partl,et al.  Layer Characteristics Affecting Interlayer Shear resistance in Flexible Pavements , 2008 .

[14]  S. Romanoschi,et al.  Characterization of Asphalt Concrete Layer Interfaces , 2001 .

[15]  Michel Raous,et al.  Interface models coupling adhesion and friction , 2011 .

[16]  Christophe Petit,et al.  Pavement Design for Curved Road Sections: Fatigue Performance of Interfaces and Longitudinal Top-down Cracking in Multilayered Pavements , 2009 .

[17]  Pierre Ladevèze,et al.  A damage computational method for composite structures , 1992 .

[18]  A. D. Bondt Anti-reflective cracking design of (reinforced) asphaltic overlays , 1999 .

[19]  M. Partl,et al.  Interlayer bond testing using a model material , 2012 .

[20]  Richard K. Leach,et al.  Characterisation of Areal Surface Texture , 2013 .

[21]  H. Ijaz,et al.  A high-cyclic elastic fatigue damage model for carbon fibre epoxy matrix laminates with different mode mixtures , 2011 .

[22]  Glaucio H. Paulino,et al.  A bilinear cohesive zone model tailored for fracture of asphalt concrete considering viscoelastic bulk material , 2006 .

[23]  E. Sanchez-Palencia Non-Homogeneous Media and Vibration Theory , 1980 .

[24]  K. Reichard,et al.  Calibration-based phase-shifting projected fringe profilometry for accurate absolute 3D surface profile measurement , 2003 .

[25]  Eduardo Júlio,et al.  A state-of-the-art review on roughness quantification methods for concrete surfaces , 2013 .

[26]  C. Petit,et al.  Pavement interface damage behavior in tension monotonic loading , 2016 .

[27]  E. S. Palencia Non-Homogeneous Media and Vibration Theory , 1980 .

[28]  Fazia Fouchal,et al.  An Interface Model Including Cracks and Roughness Applied to Masonry , 2014 .

[29]  I. Al-Qadi,et al.  A fracture-based constitutive model for pavement interface characterization , 2008 .