Neural representation of language: activation versus long-range connectivity

Cognitive functions are thought to build on connectivity within large-scale neuronal networks, rather than on strictly localized processes. Yet, present understanding of neural mechanisms of language function, as derived from neuroimaging, is based on mapping brain areas that are more active during specific linguistic tasks than in control conditions. Connectivity can then be evaluated among those areas. However, network nodes should ideally be determined based on their correlated time series of activity. Recent developments in analysis methods now facilitate localization and characterization of functionally connected neural networks directly from real-time magnetoencephalography data. Analysis of long-range connectivity might clarify and expand the view provided by traditional neurophysiological and hemodynamic activation studies. Here, we use silent reading as the example process.

[1]  David C. Plaut.  A Connectionist Approach to Word Reading and Acquired Dyslexia: Extension to Sequential Processing , 1999 .

[2]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory Synchrony between Human Extrastriate Areas during Visual Short-Term Memory Maintenance , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  W. Grodd,et al.  Differential Contributions of Motor Cortex, Basal Ganglia, and Cerebellum to Speech Motor Control: Effects of Syllable Repetition Rate Evaluated by fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[5]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  C Büchel,et al.  Brain regions involved in articulation , 1999, The Lancet.

[7]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Neural Correlates of Letter-String Length and Lexicality during Reading in a Regular Orthography , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dissociating Reading Processes on the Basis of Neuronal Interactions , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Rosenblum,et al.  Detecting direction of coupling in interacting oscillators. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  M. Petrides,et al.  Differential activation of the human orbital, mid-ventrolateral, and mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the processing of visual stimuli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Detection of n:m Phase Locking from Noisy Data: Application to Magnetoencephalography , 1998 .

[12]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  G Jobard,et al.  Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  T. Allison,et al.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe , 1994, Nature.

[16]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Cortical Effects of Shifting Letter Position in Letter Strings of Varying Length , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  The time and space of lexicality: a neuromagnetic view , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of Impaired Reading in Dyslexia , 2004, The Cognitive Neuroscience of Reading.

[19]  C. Granger.  Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint , 1980 .

[20]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[21]  J. Palva,et al.  Phase Synchrony among Neuronal Oscillations in the Human Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  F. Fazio,et al.  Dyslexia: Cultural Diversity and Biological Unity , 2001, Science.

[23]  S. Petersen,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of word reading. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[25]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[26]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  E. Rolls.  The functions of the orbitofrontal cortex , 1999, Brain and Cognition.

[29]  David Poeppel,et al.  The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  David C. Plaut,et al.  A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: extension to sequential processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[32]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing , 2006, NeuroImage.

[33]  R. Salmelin.  Clinical neurophysiology of language: The MEG approach , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[35]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Large‐scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[36]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  The Representation of Polysemy: MEG Evidence , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  C. Granger.  Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint , 1980 .

[39]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  N400-like Magnetoencephalography Responses Modulated by Semantic Context, Word Frequency, and Lexical Class in Sentences , 2002, NeuroImage.

[40]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dissociation of normal feature analysis and deficient processing of letter-strings in dyslexic adults. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  W. Singer,et al.  Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[43]  E. Formisano,et al.  Phase coupling in a cerebro-cerebellar network at 8-13 Hz during reading. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Distinct time courses of word and context comprehension in the left temporal cortex. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Valerie A. Carr,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Modality-Specific and Supramodal Word Processing , 2003, Neuron.

[47]  R. Hari,et al.  Phase locking between human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  The neural basis of intermittent motor control in humans , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.