Driver Attitudes and Behaviors at Intersections and Potential Effectiveness of Engineering Countermeasures

The objective of this focus group study was to identify driver attitudes and behaviors related to intersection safety and to assess the likely impacts of new or existing infrastructure-based technologies/countermeasures. Four focus groups were conducted at each of three test sites: Washington, DC; Chicago, IL; and Seattle, WA. At each site, the four groups corresponded to the age/gender characteristics identified as important to this project. The four groups were: 18- to 35-year-old female drivers only; 18- to 35-year-old male drivers only; 35- to 55-year-old drivers of both genders; and 65+-year-old drivers of both genders. At each site, the focus groups took place over two separate evenings, with two focus groups conducted per evening. A total of 119 individuals participated in the focus groups. The effort focused on identifying driver attitudes and behaviors with respect to four intersection scenarios: (1) red-light running, (2) left turns at busy intersections, (3) turning left onto a major road with moderate traffic, and (4) rear-end crashes. For each of these four scenarios, results and conclusions relevant to the following key questions are developed and presented: What are drivers most likely to do in this scenario? Why do drivers engage in these behaviors? What engineering countermeasures have the most promise for improving traffic safety?

[1]  J Bonneson,et al.  ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES TO REDUCE RED-LIGHT-RUNNING , 2002 .

[2]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  SYNTHESIS REPORT: EXAMINATION OF TARGET VEHICULAR CRASHES AND POTENTIAL ITS COUNTERMEASURES. FINAL REPORT , 1995 .

[3]  J Rise,et al.  Young adolescents' intention to use seat belts: the role of attitudinal and normative beliefs. , 1994, Health education research.

[4]  B E Porter,et al.  A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF RED LIGHT RUNNING: MEASURING DRIVER BEHAVIORS FOR THE "STOP RED LIGHT RUNNING" PROGRAM , 1999 .

[5]  Banwari Mittal Achieving Higher Seat Belt Usage: The Role of Habit in Bridging the Attitude‐Behavior Gap1 , 1988 .

[6]  David Andreassen A LONG TERM STUDY OF RED LIGHT CAMERAS AND ACCIDENTS. , 1995 .

[7]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  Characteristics of red light violators: Results of a field investigation , 1996 .

[8]  Darren J Torbic,et al.  GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AASHTO STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN. VOLUME 5: A GUIDE FOR ADDRESSING UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION COLLISIONS , 2003 .

[9]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  ANALYSIS OF CROSSING PATH CRASH COUNTERMEASURE SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[10]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Application of an Integrated Behavioral Model to Predict Condom Use: A Prospective Study Among High HIV Risk Groups1 , 1998 .

[11]  Ronald Pfefer,et al.  GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AASHTO STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN. VOLUME 12: A GUIDE FOR REDUCING COLLISIONS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 2004 .

[12]  Griffin OLDER DRIVER INVOLVEMENT IN INJURY CRASHES IN TEXAS 1975 - 1999 , 2004 .

[13]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Toward an understanding of condom use behaviours: A theoretical and methodological overview of Project SAFER , 2001 .

[14]  Brian A. Jonah,et al.  Predicting reported seat belt use from attitudinal and normative factors , 1982 .

[15]  A J McKnight,et al.  INTERSECTION NEGOTIATION PROBLEMS OF OLDER DRIVERS, VOLUME II: BACKGROUND SYNTHESIS ON AGE AND INTERSECTION DRIVING DIFFICULTIES , 1998 .

[16]  Kofi Obeng,et al.  A detailed investigation of crash risk reduction resulting from red light cameras in small urban areas , 2004 .

[17]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  Analysis of crossing path crashes , 2001 .