The role of the self-concept and the social context in determining the behavior of power holders: self-construal in intergroup versus dyadic dispute resolution negotiations.

In this work, the authors explored how a person's view of himself or herself might determine his or her use of power in a complex dispute resolution negotiation. In 3 studies of asymmetric power in negotiations, the authors demonstrated that the impact of power on motivation and behavior is moderated by both a person's self-view and the social context. In Study 1, the results revealed that in a one-on-one dispute, powerful individuals primed to hold an interdependent (as opposed to independent) self-construal are more generous in resolving their disputes with low-powered opponents. Study 2 replicated this finding but revealed a different pattern in intergroup disputes, in which powerful interdependent teams of negotiators are actually less generous than are independent teams. Study 3 provided a conceptual replication of Study 2, with the use of chronic measures of self-construal and self-reported measures of behavior. Results suggest that an interdependent self-construal may lead to a more benevolent use of power in dyadic conflicts but more exploitive uses of power in intergroup conflicts. Implications for the understanding of power and self-construal are discussed.

[1]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attitudes and Social Cognition Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power , 2022 .

[2]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Coping with Group-Based Discrimination: Individualistic Versus Group-Level Strategies , 1998 .

[3]  Tenbrunsel,et al.  The Negotiation Matching Process: Relationships and Partner Selection. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[4]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Forms of Social Awareness: Their Frequency and Correlates , 1993 .

[5]  D. Farrow,et al.  The power motive as an influence on use of power. , 1979 .

[6]  David M. Messick,et al.  Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives , 1983 .

[7]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  L. Ross,et al.  Independence from Whom? Interdependence with Whom? Cultural Perspectives on Ingroups Versus Outgroups , 1999 .

[9]  David L. Williams,et al.  Negotiation Process and out come of Stranger Dyads and Dating Couples: Do Lovers Lose? , 1983 .

[10]  Stephen B. Goldberg,et al.  Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict , 1993 .

[11]  J. Oetzel.  Self-Construals, Communication Processes, and Group Outcomes in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Groups , 2001 .

[12]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[13]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[14]  Dieter Frey,et al.  The Effects of Intragroup Interaction and Cohesion on Intergroup Bias , 2004 .

[15]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  The Influence of Individualism Collectivism, Self-Monitoring, and Predicted-Outcome Value on Communication in Ingroup and Outgroup Relationships , 1992 .

[16]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Terri R. Kurtzberg,et al.  Schmooze or Lose: Social Friction and Lubrication in E-Mail Negotiations , 2000 .

[18]  Donna Brazil,et al.  Interindividual-Intergroup Discontinuity in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game , 1994 .

[19]  Arthur Aron,et al.  Including others in the self: Extensions to own and partner's group memberships. , 2001 .

[20]  T. Tyler,et al.  Power Asymmetries and the Ethical Atmosphere in Negotiations , 2001 .

[21]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Cultural Divides: Understanding and Overcoming Group Conflict , 2001 .

[22]  Serena Chen,et al.  Examining the Effects of Power as a Function of Self-Construals and Gender , 2002 .

[23]  D. Trafimow,et al.  The Importance of Subjective Norms for a Minority of People: between Subjects and within-Subjects Analyses , 1996 .

[24]  Elizabeth A. Mannix,et al.  WILL WE MEET AGAIN? EFFECTS OF POWER, DISTRIBUTION NORMS, AND SCOPE OF FUTURE INTERACTION IN SMALL GROUP NEGOTIATION , 1994 .

[25]  William P. Smith,et al.  INFORMATION EXCHANGE, TOUGHNESS, AND INTEGRATIVE BARGAINING: THE ROLES OF EXPLICIT CUES AND PERSPECTIVE‐TAKING , 1994 .

[26]  B. Hannover,et al.  Assimilation and contrast in social comparisons as a consequence of self‐construal activation , 2000 .

[27]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness and Interpersonal Conflict , 1992 .

[28]  J. Brett.  Negotiating globally: how to negotiate deals, resolve disputes, and make decisions across cultural boundaries, second edition , 2001 .

[29]  Terri R. Kurtzberg,et al.  Long and Short Routes to Success in Electronically Mediated Negotiations: Group Affiliations and Good Vibrations. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[30]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henri Tajfel , 1996 .

[31]  C. Stangor,et al.  Prejudice : the target's perspective , 1999 .

[32]  T. Chartrand,et al.  From Moses to Marcos: Individual differences in the use and abuse of power. , 2001 .

[33]  D. Winter,et al.  Responsibility and the power motive in women and men , 1985 .

[34]  Chris Roddenberry,et al.  When groups are more competitive than individuals: the domain of the discontinuity effect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Itesh Sachdev,et al.  Social categorization and power differentials in group relations , 1985 .

[36]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[37]  M. Hogg,et al.  Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories , 1987 .

[38]  Bernadette Park,et al.  Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention☆ , 2006 .

[39]  Andreas Diekmann,et al.  The Power of Reciprocity , 2004 .

[40]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  An In-Group Becomes Part of the Self: Response Time Evidence , 1996 .

[41]  D. Trafimow,et al.  Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. , 1991 .

[42]  Simona Sacchi,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Castano Et Al. / Mortality Salience and Ingroup Entitativity I Belong Therefore I Exist: Ingroup Identification, Ingroup Entitativity, and Ingroup Bias , 2022 .

[43]  B. Latané,et al.  Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Social identity and the sovereignty of the group: A psychology of belonging , 2000 .

[45]  Kenneth A. Graetz,et al.  The Generality of the Individual-Group Discontinuity Effect: Variations in Positivity-Negativity of Outcomes, Players' Relative Power, and Magnitude of Outcomes , 1991 .

[46]  S. Otten,et al.  Intergroup Discrimination in Positive and Negative Outcome Allocations: Impact of Stimulus Valence, Relative Group Status, and Relative Group Size , 1996 .

[47]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[48]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations , 1991 .

[49]  W. Gardner,et al.  Circle of Friends or Members of a Group? Sex Differences in Relational and Collective Attachment to Groups , 2003 .

[50]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Self and social identity. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[51]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of Unequal Power on Cooperation in Conflict , 1979 .

[52]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Influence strategy, perspective-taking, and relationships between high- and low-power individuals in cooperative and competitive contexts. , 1984 .

[53]  Shigehiro Oishi,et al.  Goals, Culture, and Subjective Well-Being , 2001 .

[54]  D. Winter,et al.  Self-definition and social definition in women. , 1974 .

[55]  Constantine Sedikides,et al.  Individual values, social identity, and optimal distinctiveness. , 2001 .

[56]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[57]  H. Triandis.  The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[58]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Individual–collective primacy and ingroup favoritism: enhancement and protection effects , 2002 .

[59]  K. Dion,et al.  Cohesiveness as a determinant of ingroup-outgroup bias. , 1973 .

[60]  David Trafimow,et al.  How Priming the Private Self or Collective Self Affects the Relative Weights of Attitudes and Subjective Norms , 1998 .

[61]  Gertrude Himmelfarb,et al.  Essays On Freedom And Power , 2010 .

[62]  L. Ross,et al.  Psychological Barriers to Dispute Resolution , 1995 .

[63]  Jack L. Vevea,et al.  Beyond the group mind: a quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[64]  K. Bos.  On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments , 2003 .

[65]  John Thibaut,et al.  Competition and cooperation between groups and between individuals , 1985 .

[66]  W. Gardner,et al.  The individual as "melting pot": The flexibility of bicultural self-construals , 2004 .

[67]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[68]  S. Fiske,et al.  Power Can Bias Impression Processes: Stereotyping Subordinates by Default and by Design , 2000 .

[69]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[70]  When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. , 2001 .

[71]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Metamorphic effects of power. , 1976 .

[72]  G. Hertel,et al.  What do you think is "fair"? Effects of ingroup norms and outcome control on fairness judgments , 2002 .

[73]  R. Lalonde,et al.  Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. , 1994 .

[74]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption. , 2001 .

[75]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Social Identification, Interdependence and Discrimination , 1998 .

[76]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[77]  Heather M. Coon,et al.  Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[78]  H. Triandis.  Individualism-collectivism and personality. , 2001, Journal of personality.

[79]  R. Baumeister,et al.  What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: comment on Cross and Madson (1997) , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[80]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Studies in Social Power. , 1960 .

[81]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[82]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social identity, leadership, and power , 2001 .

[83]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison , 1972 .

[84]  S. Cross,et al.  Models of the self: self-construals and gender. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.