Entropy and Gravity Concepts as New Methodological Indexes to Investigate Technological Convergence: Patent Network-Based Approach

The volatility and uncertainty in the process of technological developments are growing faster than ever due to rapid technological innovations. Such phenomena result in integration among disparate technology fields. At this point, it is a critical research issue to understand the different roles and the propensity of each element technology for technological convergence. In particular, the network-based approach provides a holistic view in terms of technological linkage structures. Furthermore, the development of new indicators based on network visualization can reveal the dynamic patterns among disparate technologies in the process of technological convergence and provide insights for future technological developments. This research attempts to analyze and discover the patterns of the international patent classification codes of the United States Patent and Trademark Office's patent data in printed electronics, which is a representative technology in the technological convergence process. To this end, we apply the physical idea as a new methodological approach to interpret technological convergence. More specifically, the concepts of entropy and gravity are applied to measure the activities among patent citations and the binding forces among heterogeneous technologies during technological convergence. By applying the entropy and gravity indexes, we could distinguish the characteristic role of each technology in printed electronics. At the technological convergence stage, each technology exhibits idiosyncratic dynamics which tend to decrease technological differences and heterogeneity. Furthermore, through nonlinear regression analysis, we have found the decreasing patterns of disparity over a given total period in the evolution of technological convergence. This research has discovered the specific role of each element technology field and has consequently identified the co-evolutionary patterns of technological convergence. These new findings on the evolutionary patterns of technological convergence provide some implications for engineering and technology foresight research, as well as for corporate strategy and technology policy.

[1]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[2]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  Critical infrastructures : state of the art in research and application , 2003 .

[3]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Characterizing and Modeling Citation Dynamics , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  Rna Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Knowledge positions in high-tech markets: Trajectories, standards, strategies and true innovators , 2012 .

[5]  S. Willich,et al.  Patenting of University and Non-University Public Research Organisations in Germany: Evidence from Patent Applications for Medical Research Results , 2010, PloS one.

[6]  Fredrik Hacklin,et al.  Coevolutionary cycles of convergence: An extrapolation from the ICT industry , 2009 .

[7]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  An indicator of cross-disciplinary research , 1985, Scientometrics.

[8]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[9]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[10]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.

[11]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  Dynamics of scientific knowledge bases as proxies for discerning technological emergence — The case of MEMS/NEMS technologies , 2013 .

[12]  Jan G. Korvink,et al.  Printed electronics: the challenges involved in printing devices, interconnects, and contacts based on inorganic materials , 2010 .

[13]  N. Rosenberg Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910 , 1963, The Journal of Economic History.

[14]  J. Leker,et al.  Anticipating converging industries using publicly available data , 2010 .

[15]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  D. Mabey,et al.  Neglected tropical diseases. , 2010, British medical bulletin.

[17]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Trajectory patterns of technology fusion: Trend analysis and taxonomical grouping in nanobiotechnology , 2010 .

[18]  C. Morel,et al.  Co-authorship Network Analysis: A Powerful Tool for Strategic Planning of Research, Development and Capacity Building Programs on Neglected Diseases , 2009, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[19]  Wolfgang Glänzel The role of core documents in bibliometric network analysis and their relation with h-type indices , 2012, Scientometrics.

[20]  Fredrik Hacklin,et al.  Management of Convergence in Innovation: Strategies and Capabilities for Value Creation Beyond Blurring Industry Boundaries , 2007 .

[21]  Helena M. M. Lastres,et al.  Emerging Patterns of Innovation: Sources of Japan's Technological Edge , 1994 .

[22]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  Nanotechnology innovation system: Understanding hidden dynamics of nanoscience fusion trajectories , 2009 .

[23]  Hariolf Grupp The concept of entropy in scientometrics and innovation research , 2005, Scientometrics.

[24]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[25]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[26]  C. Borés,et al.  Technological convergence: a strategic perspective , 2001 .

[27]  J. Bauer,et al.  Chapter 10 DELINEATING THE SCOPE OF CONVERGENCE IN INFRASTRUCTURES New Frontiers for Competition , 2003 .

[28]  Yoshiyuki Takeda,et al.  Nanobiotechnology as an emerging research domain from nanotechnology: A bibliometric approach , 2009, Scientometrics.

[29]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators , 2001, Scientometrics.

[30]  Fredrik Hacklin,et al.  An evolutionary perspective on convergence: inducing a stage model of inter-industry innovation , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[31]  C. Morel,et al.  Enabling Policy Planning and Innovation Management through Patent Information and Co-Authorship Network Analyses: A Study of Tuberculosis in Brazil , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  Johannes M. Bauer,et al.  Delineating the Scope of Convergence in Infrastructures , 2003 .

[33]  J. Leker,et al.  Patent indicators for monitoring convergence - examples from NFF and ICT , 2011 .

[34]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Publications and patents in nanotechnology , 2003, Scientometrics.

[35]  N. Islam,et al.  Nanotechnology systems of innovation - An analysis of industry and academia research activities , 2007 .