Cognitive biases in energy decisions during the planning, design, and construction of commercial buildings in the United States: an analytical framework and research needs

Despite a national goal for every building to achieve net-zero energy by 2050 and despite exemplary projects proving the technical and economic feasibility of much better energy performance, commercial buildings in the USA today use more energy per square foot than they ever have. Decisions made during planning, design, and construction (delivery) of commercial buildings appear systematically irrational, not maximizing utility for designers, occupants, or society. In other fields, notably economics, improved understanding of cognitive biases like “loss aversion” and “anchoring” has helped to explain seemingly irrational decision making. Related work has examined these cognitive biases for energy decisions made in an occupied building. Less clear is the role these cognitive biases play in the high-impact, long-term energy decisions made during commercial building delivery. As an initial step towards addressing this gap in understanding, this paper outlines key energy decisions in commercial building delivery and shows how cognitive biases may impact these decisions. A suggested approach to study these biases, and to design policies that address them, is provided. By highlighting these potential cognitive biases, based on an understanding of the building delivery process, this paper aims to engage those with relevant expertise in the behavioral and social sciences to help address the decision making that is preventing progress towards improved energy performance in commercial buildings.

[1]  P. Herr,et al.  Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. , 1986 .

[2]  Paulson DESIGNING TO REDUCE CONSTRUCTION COSTS , 1976 .

[3]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  Numeric Judgments under Uncertainty: The Role of Knowledge in Anchoring , 2000 .

[4]  Leidy E. Klotz,et al.  Unintended anchors: Building rating systems and energy performance goals for U.S. buildings , 2010 .

[5]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[6]  Stephen J. DeCanio,et al.  Barriers within firms to energy-efficient investments , 1993 .

[7]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice , 2004 .

[8]  D. ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Bottom–up assessment of potentials and costs of CO2 emission mitigation in the buildings sector: insights into the missing elements , 2009 .

[9]  Erling Moxnes Estimating customer utility of energy efficiency standards for refrigerators , 2004 .

[10]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[11]  Richard H. Thaler,et al.  Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice , 1985, Mark. Sci..

[12]  S. Kulakowski Large organizations' investments in energy-efficient building retrofits , 1999 .

[13]  R. Parnell,et al.  Informing the Development of Domestic Energy Efficiency Initiatives , 2005 .

[14]  Arthur S. Elstein,et al.  Cognitive processes and biases in medical decision making , 2000 .

[15]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[16]  I. Janis Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[17]  Avraham Shama,et al.  Energy conservation in US buildings: Solving the high potential/low adoption paradox from a behavioural perspective , 1983 .

[18]  L. Lutzenhiser Social and Behavioral Aspects of Energy use , 1993 .

[19]  M. Hurd Anchoring and Acquiescence Bias in Measuring Assets in Household Surveys , 1999 .

[20]  Leidy E. Klotz,et al.  A Design Process Evaluation Method for Sustainable Buildings , 2009 .

[21]  Michael L. Dennis,et al.  Effective Dissemination of Energy-Related Information: Applying Social Psychology and Evaluation Research. , 1990 .

[22]  L. D. Danny Harvey,et al.  Reducing energy use in the buildings sector: measures, costs, and examples , 2009 .

[23]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction , 1988 .

[24]  Richard A. Winett,et al.  Psychological framework for energy conservation in buildings: Strategies, outcomes, directions , 1979 .

[25]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean? , 1994 .

[26]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[27]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[28]  H. Staats,et al.  Effecting Durable Change , 2004 .

[29]  G. Gigerenzer Bounded and rational , 2006 .

[30]  Stephen J. DeCanio,et al.  The efficiency paradox: bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving investments , 1998 .

[31]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Social Loading and Sustainable Consumption , 1999 .

[32]  David R. Riley,et al.  Lean Processes for Sustainable Project Delivery , 2006 .

[33]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Advances in behavioral economics , 2004 .

[34]  Carel Dieperink,et al.  Diffusion of energy-saving innovations in industry and the built environment: Dutch studies as inputs for a more integrated analytical framework , 2004 .

[35]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron , 2003 .

[36]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison , 1994 .

[37]  Peter Lund,et al.  Market penetration rates of new energy technologies , 2006 .

[38]  Walter J.V. Vermeulen,et al.  Competing explanations for adopting energy innovations for new office buildings , 2006 .

[39]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Psychology of Promoting Environmentalism: Psychological Contributions toAchieving an Ecologically Sustainable Future for Humanity , 2000 .

[40]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[41]  K. Kurani,et al.  Car buyers and fuel economy , 2007 .

[42]  Gary Klein,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[43]  G. Jin,et al.  The Effect of Information on Product Quality: Evidence from Restaurant Hygiene Grade Cards , 2002 .

[44]  Martin Sexton,et al.  Process models implementation in the construction industry: a literature synthesis , 2005 .

[45]  Elliot B. Gordon,et al.  Integrated design and building process: what research and methodologies are needed? , 2000 .

[46]  R. Borden One More Look at Social and Environmental Psychology: Away from the Looking Glass and into the Future , 1977 .

[47]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[48]  Jonathan G. Koomey,et al.  ENERGY-EFFICIENT LIGHTING: MARKET DATA, MARKET IMPERFECTIONS, AND POLICY SUCCESS , 1996 .

[49]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Folk quantification of energy , 1982 .

[50]  P. Stern,et al.  Psychological research for the new energy problems: Strategies and opportunities. , 1992 .

[51]  Alan Meier,et al.  Consumer discount rates implied by purchases of energy-efficient refrigerators , 1983 .

[52]  D. Ariely Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions , 2008 .

[53]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  A social psychological perspective on energy conservation in residential buildings. , 1983 .

[54]  P. Linares,et al.  Energy Efficiency: Economics and Policy , 2010 .

[55]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  Analytical design planning technique: a model of the detailed building design process , 1999 .

[56]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research , 2000 .

[57]  Lara Greden,et al.  Integrated cost-estimation methodology to support high-performance building design , 2009 .

[58]  S. Linder On cogency, professional bias, and public policy: an assessment of four views of the injury problem. , 1987, The Milbank quarterly.

[59]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks , 1995 .

[60]  O. Svenson ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS , 1981 .

[61]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[62]  R. Judkoff,et al.  Assessment of the Technical Potential for Achieving Net Zero-Energy Buildings in the Commercial Sector , 2007 .

[63]  Cathy Turner,et al.  Green Building Performance Evaluation: Measured Results from LEED-New Construction Buildings , 2008 .

[64]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the Probe buildings , 2001 .

[65]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Energy sustainable communities : Environmental psychological investigations , 2008 .

[66]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms : theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings , 1998 .

[67]  R. Stainton Contemporary debates in cognitive science , 2006 .

[68]  Leidy Klotz,et al.  A Lean Modeling Protocol for Evaluating Green Project Delivery , 2007 .

[69]  Bill Curtis,et al.  Process modeling , 1992, CACM.

[70]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[71]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.