Balancing knowledge sharing with protecting: The efficacy of formal control in open innovation projects

Abstract A key challenge in open innovation (OI) projects relates to the tension of facilitating open knowledge exchange processes while ensuring sufficient protection to avoid knowledge leakage. Although prior research has discussed several solutions to balance sharing with protecting, these practices either tend to lay too much or not enough emphasis on knowledge protection. In this article, we complement current research by examining whether the formal control mechanisms, prespecified behaviors and prespecified outcomes, may serve as more efficacious project management solutions. We investigate their effect on OI project performance and knowledge leakage and compare their influence with that of contracts, using a data set of 106 new product OI projects in high-technology industries. We find that prespecified behaviors influence project performance in the form of an inverted U-shape, while prespecified outcome increases project performance in a linear fashion. Contracts decrease knowledge leakage while having no influence on project performance. Our study contributes to a more elevated understanding of the role of project management in coping better with the inherent sharing-protecting tension in OI.

[1]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[2]  P. Ritala,et al.  Knowledge sharing, knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance: An empirical study , 2015 .

[3]  H. Gemünden,et al.  The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success , 2004 .

[4]  Mona V. Makhija,et al.  The Role Of Organizational Controls In Managing Knowledge , 2006 .

[5]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Inter-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects , 2008 .

[6]  Aihua Wu,et al.  Impact of specific investments, governance mechanisms and behaviors on the performance of cooperative innovation projects , 2017 .

[7]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Managing collaborative research projects: A synthesis of project management literature and directives for future research , 2015 .

[8]  P. Ritala,et al.  Managing the Appropriability of R&D Collaboration , 2016 .

[9]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[10]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[11]  A. Madhok,et al.  Trust and Formal Contracts in Interorganizational Relationships - Substitutes and Complements , 2004 .

[12]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures , 2002 .

[13]  Jan van den Ende,et al.  Subjective Performance Assessment of Innovation Projects , 2010 .

[14]  M. Bogers.  The Open Innovation Paradox: Knowledge Sharing and Protection in R&D Collaborations , 2010 .

[15]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm - A Problem-solving Perspective , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Alan Gibbons,et al.  Managing collaborative R&D projects development of a practical management tool , 2006 .

[18]  V. Chiesa,et al.  How to use pilot projects to implement open innovation , 2010 .

[19]  Martin Hemmert,et al.  The effectiveness of relational and contractual governance in new product development collaborations: Evidence from Korea , 2015 .

[20]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS , 2014 .

[21]  A. Salter,et al.  The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration , 2014 .

[22]  Xu Jiang,et al.  Managing knowledge leakage in strategic alliances: The effects of trust and formal contracts , 2013 .

[23]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[24]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs , 2017 .

[25]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents , 2003 .

[26]  Marcel Bogers,et al.  Open innovation: current status and research opportunities , 2016 .

[27]  Arvind Parkhe.  Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation , 1993 .

[28]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[29]  S. Cavusgil,et al.  Curbing Foreign Distributor Opportunism: An Examination of Trust, Contracts, and the Legal Environment in International Channel Relationships , 2004 .

[30]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[31]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  Open Innovation, Generativity and the Supplier as Peer: The Case of Iphone and Android , 2011, Digital Disruptive Innovation.

[32]  Michael A. Stanko,et al.  Under the Wide Umbrella of Open Innovation , 2017 .

[33]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error , 1981 .

[34]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[35]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Opening Up for Competitive Advantage – How Deutsche Telekom Creates an Open Innovation Ecosystem , 2009 .

[36]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Value Creation and Value Capture in Open Innovation , 2018, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[37]  Y. Doz.  The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? , 2007 .

[38]  T. Salge,et al.  Reconceptualizing the paradox of openness: How solvers navigate sharing-protecting tensions in crowdsourcing , 2019, Research Policy.

[39]  Annika Lorenz,et al.  Once bitten, less shy? The influence of prior misappropriation experience on R&D collaboration , 2018 .

[40]  T. Das,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Opportunism in the Alliance Development Process , 2011 .

[41]  H. Ernst,et al.  External Technology Commercialization in Large Firms: Results of a Quantitative Benchmarking Study , 2007 .

[42]  Ossi Pesämaa,et al.  Absorptive capacity, co-creation, and innovation performance , 2019 .

[43]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[44]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[45]  Moshe Farjoun.  Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[46]  Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen,et al.  Trajectories towards balancing value creation and capture: Resolution paths and tension loops in open innovation projects , 2020, International Journal of Project Management.

[47]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[48]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[49]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  The influence of business strategies on technological network activities , 1995 .

[50]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2006 .

[51]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[52]  J. Henkel.  Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[53]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Team play: Heedful interrelating as the boundary for innovation , 2004 .

[54]  P. Keinz,et al.  Technological competence leveraging projects via intermediaries: Viable means to outbound open innovation and mediated capability building? , 2020 .

[55]  Mark de Rond,et al.  On the Dialectics of Strategic Alliances , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[56]  J. Swart,et al.  Ambidexterity in projects: An intellectual capital perspective , 2015 .

[57]  Bart van Looy,et al.  Managing the Co-Operation–Competition Dilemma in R&D Alliances: A Multiple Case Study in the Advanced Materials Industry , 2007 .

[58]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Technological interweavement: a means of achieving innovation success , 1992 .

[59]  Weisi Guo,et al.  Dynamic Complex Network Analysis of PM 2.5 Concentrations in the UK using Hierarchical Directed Graphs (V1.0.0) , 2020 .

[60]  J. March.  Continuity and Change in Theories of Organizational Action , 1996 .

[61]  K. Blind,et al.  How Open is Too Open? The Mitigating Role of Appropriation Mechanisms in R&D Cooperation Settings , 2016 .

[62]  J. Nishimura,et al.  Internal and external discipline: The effect of project leadership and government monitoring on the performance of publicly funded R&D consortia , 2018, Research Policy.

[63]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Explicating the dynamics of project capabilities , 2016 .

[64]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Selecting single items to measure doubly concrete constructs: A cautionary tale , 2016 .

[65]  Project and Innovation Management: Bridging Contemporary Trends in Theory and Practice , 2016 .

[66]  Andrea Fosfuri.  The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .

[67]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  The role of contracts and intellectual property rights in open innovation , 2015, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[68]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Dynamics of Open Strategy: From Adoption to Reversion , 2017 .

[69]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[70]  Mona V. Makhija,et al.  The Relationship Between Control and Partner Learning in Learning-Related Joint Ventures , 1997 .

[71]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  A Fad or a Phenomenon?: The Adoption of Open Innovation Practices in Large Firms , 2014 .

[72]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  The Adoption of Open Innovation in Large Firms , 2018 .

[73]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[74]  Matthias R. Guertler,et al.  Exploring the enabling effects of project management for SMEs in adopting open innovation – A framework for partner search and selection in open innovation projects , 2020 .

[75]  William G. Olchi.  The Transmission of Control Through Organizational Hierarchy , 1978 .

[76]  M. Stone.  Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions , 1976 .

[77]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling , 2017 .

[78]  Manuel Expósito-Langa,et al.  Knowledge network dynamics in clusters: past performance and absorptive capacity , 2016 .

[79]  M. Grimaldi,et al.  What about the people? Micro-foundations of open innovation in megaprojects , 2020 .

[80]  M. Bogers,et al.  Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation , 2014 .

[81]  Robert A. Simons.  How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal , 1994 .

[82]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  A User Community-Based Approach to Leveraging Technological Competences: An Exploratory Case Study of a Technology Start-Up from MIT , 2010 .

[83]  Julian Lowe,et al.  Protecting Strategic Knowledge: Insights from Collaborative Agreements in the Aerospace Sector , 2004, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[84]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  NPD Planning Activities and Innovation Performance: The Mediating Role of Process Management and the Moderating Effect of Product Innovativeness , 2007 .

[85]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[86]  L. Crawford,et al.  Preparing for Successful Collaborative Contracts , 2020, Sustainability.

[87]  S. Geisser.  A predictive approach to the random effect model , 1974 .

[88]  Claudio Pizzi,et al.  Open Innovation at Project Level: Key Issues and Future Research Agenda , 2014 .

[89]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Trust as an Organizing Principle , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[90]  Ralph Levene,et al.  Focusing on business projects as an area for future research: An exploratory discussion of four different perspectives , 2006 .

[91]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[92]  Arun Rai,et al.  Discovering Unobserved Heterogeneity in Structural Equation Models to Avert Validity Threats , 2013, MIS Q..

[93]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities , 1998 .

[94]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Value Creation in Buyer–Seller Relationships: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results from a Supplier's Perspective , 2001 .

[95]  P. Trott.  Exploring Knowledge Flows and Losses in the ‘Open Innovation’ Age , 2008 .

[96]  Ulrike de Brentani,et al.  Performance of Global New Product Development Programs: A Resource‐Based View , 2007 .

[97]  Stephen A. Leybourne,et al.  Advancing Project Management: Authenticating the Shift from Process to “Nuanced” Project-Based Management in the Ambidextrous Organization , 2012 .

[98]  A. Arora,et al.  The Paradox of Openness Revisited: Collaborative Innovation and Patenting by UK Innovators , 2015 .

[99]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Real-world R&D: jumping the product generation gap , 1999 .

[100]  Daniel L. Fay,et al.  Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art , 2012, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[101]  Svenja C. Sommer,et al.  The Tension Between Flexible Goals and Managerial Control in Exploratory Projects , 2019, Project Management Journal.

[102]  A. Ariño,et al.  Strategic alliance contracts: dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity , 2007 .

[103]  Min Zhang,et al.  The impact of trust and contract on innovation performance: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty , 2011 .

[104]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[105]  H. Harman.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[106]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  The dark side of knowledge transfer: Exploring knowledge leakage in joint R&D projects , 2015 .

[107]  Alexander Kock,et al.  Firms' intellectual property ownership aggressiveness in university–industry collaboration projects: Choosing the right governance mode , 2020 .

[108]  B. Looy,et al.  Toward An Integrative Perspective on Alliance Governance: Connecting Contract Design, Trust Dynamics, and Contract Application , 2008 .

[109]  Haemin Dennis Park,et al.  The Paradox of Openness: How Product and Patenting Experience Affect R&D Sourcing in China? , 2017 .

[110]  I. Geyskens,et al.  The Formation of Buyer–Supplier Relationships: Detailed Contract Drafting and Close Partner Selection , 2005 .

[111]  P. Ritala,et al.  The multiple faces of tension: dualities in decision-making , 2018, Review of Managerial Science.

[112]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Interactive Self-Regulatory Theory for Sharing and Protecting in Interorganizational Collaborations , 2015 .

[113]  Bill McEvily,et al.  Reorganizing the Boundaries of Trust: From Discrete Alternatives to Hybrid Forms , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[114]  L. Kirsch.  The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .

[115]  J. Swart,et al.  Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda , 2013 .

[116]  Laura B. Cardinal.  Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development , 2001 .

[117]  Fabrice Lumineau,et al.  How Contracts Influence Trust and Distrust , 2017 .

[118]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM , 2019, European Business Review.

[119]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[120]  G. Slowinski,et al.  Good Practices in Open Innovation , 2010 .

[121]  Markus Reitzig,et al.  Managing the business risks of open innovation , 2012 .

[122]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[123]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements , 2002 .

[124]  Felipe Plana Maranzato,et al.  Configurations of project management practices to enhance the performance of open innovation R&D projects , 2020 .

[125]  Li Liu,et al.  Simultaneous Pursuit of Innovation and Efficiency in Complex Engineering Projects—A Study of the Antecedents and Impacts of Ambidexterity in Project Teams , 2012 .

[126]  G. D. Lauritzen,et al.  Perspective: Leveraging Open Innovation through Paradox , 2018, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[127]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  Uncovering and Treating Unobserved Heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Which Model Selection Criterion Provides an Appropriate Number of Segments? , 2011 .

[128]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Exploration and exploitation in project-based organizations: Development and diffusion of knowledge at different organizational levels in construction companies , 2013 .

[129]  G. Day.  Advantageous alliances , 1995 .

[130]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .