Simulating Yield Response of Quinoa to Water Availability with AquaCrop

The modeling of yield response to water is expected to play an increasingly important role in the optimization of crop water productivity (WP) in agriculture. During 3 yr (2004―2007), field experiments were conducted to assess the crop response to water stress of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in the Bolivian Altiplano (4000 masl) under different watering conditions (from rain fed, RF, to full irrigation, FI). Crop physiological measurements and comparisons between simulated and observed soil water content (SWC), canopy cover (CC), biomass production, and final seed yield of a selected number of fields were used to calibrate the AquaCrop model. Subsequently, the model was validated for different locations and varieties using data from other experimental fields and from farmers' fields. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed for key input variables of the parameterized model. AquaCrop simulated well the decrease of the harvest index (HI) of quinoa in response to drought during early grain filling as observed in the field. Further-on, the procedure for triggering early canopy senescence was deactivated in the model as observed in the field. Biomass WP (g m ―2 ) decreased by 9% under fully irrigated conditions compared with RF and deficit irrigation (DI) conditions, most probably due to severe nutrient depletion. Satisfactory results were obtained for the simulation of total biomass and seed yield [validation regression R 2 = 0.87 and 0.83, and Nash-Sutcliff efficiency (EF) = 0.82 and 0.79, respectively]. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the AquaCrop model for simulation ofquinoa growth and production, although further improvements of the model for soil nutrient depletion, pests, diseases, and frost are also possible.

[1]  D. Raes,et al.  AquaCrop-The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: I. Concepts and Underlying Principles , 2009 .

[2]  D. Raes,et al.  AquaCrop — The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: II. Main Algorithms and Software Description , 2009 .

[3]  D. Raes,et al.  Crop water use indicators to quantify the flexible phenology of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in response to drought stress , 2008 .

[4]  D. Raes,et al.  Could deficit irrigation be a sustainable practice for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in the Southern Bolivian Altiplano , 2008 .

[5]  P. Debaeke,et al.  Thresholds for leaf expansion and transpiration response to soil water deficit in a range of sunflower genotypes , 2008 .

[6]  D. Raes,et al.  Introducing deficit irrigation to stabilize yields of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) , 2008 .

[7]  P. Searles,et al.  Leaf-level responses of olive trees (Olea europaea) to the suspension of irrigation during the winter in an arid region of Argentina , 2008 .

[8]  S. Azam-Ali,et al.  Growth and development of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) in response to soil moisture: 1. Dry matter and yield , 2007 .

[9]  E. Fereres,et al.  On the conservative behavior of biomass water productivity , 2007, Irrigation Science.

[10]  K. Metselaar,et al.  The Shape of the Transpiration Reduction Function under Plant Water Stress , 2007 .

[11]  T. Winkel,et al.  Response of some Andean cultivars of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to temperature: Effects on germination, phenology, growth and freezing , 2006 .

[12]  D. Raes,et al.  Agro-climatic suitability mapping for crop production in the Bolivian Altiplano: A case study for quinoa , 2006 .

[13]  W. Rawls,et al.  Soil Water Characteristic Estimates by Texture and Organic Matter for Hydrologic Solutions , 2006 .

[14]  J. M. Faci,et al.  Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment , 2006 .

[15]  D. Raes,et al.  Simulation of yield decline as a result of water stress with a robust soil water balance model , 2006 .

[16]  Richard G. Allen,et al.  Dynamics of reference evapotranspiration in the Bolivian highlands (Altiplano) , 2004 .

[17]  T. Arkebauer,et al.  Hybrid-maize—a maize simulation model that combines two crop modeling approaches , 2004 .

[18]  L. Bravo,et al.  Plant responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to frost at various phenological stages , 2004 .

[19]  Miroslav Trnka,et al.  Comparison of CERES, WOFOST and SWAP models in simulating soil water content during growing season under different soil conditions , 2004 .

[20]  Gregory S. McMaster,et al.  Phenological responses of wheat and barley to water and temperature: improving simulation models , 2003, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[21]  D. Raes,et al.  Evapotranspiration analysis and irrigation requirements of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) in the Bolivian highlands , 2003 .

[22]  P. Esbjerg,et al.  Advances in the Knowledge of Quinoa Pests , 2003 .

[23]  A. Bonifacio,et al.  Diseases of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) , 2003 .

[24]  R. Ortiz,et al.  The Global Potential for Quinoa and Other Andean Crops , 2003 .

[25]  Sven-Erik Jacobsen,et al.  The Worldwide Potential for Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoaWilld.) , 2003 .

[26]  S. Jacobsen,et al.  The Resistance of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoaWilld.) to Adverse Abiotic Factors , 2003 .

[27]  Luis S. Pereira,et al.  Irrigation management under water scarcity , 2002 .

[28]  S. Azam-Ali,et al.  Principles of Tropical Agronomy , 2002 .

[29]  P. S. Carberry,et al.  Predicting growth and development of pigeonpea: a simulation model , 2001 .

[30]  M. Andersen,et al.  Leaf gas exchange and water relation characteristics of field quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) during soil drying , 2000 .

[31]  J. Vacher.  Responses of two main Andean crops, quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and papa amarga (Solanum juzepczukii Buk.) to drought on the Bolivian Altiplano: Significance of local adaptation , 1998 .

[32]  W. Wilhelm,et al.  Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations , 1997 .

[33]  J. L. Dardanelli,et al.  ROOTING DEPTH AND SOIL WATER EXTRACTION PATTERNS OF DIFFERENT CROPS IN A SILTY LOAM HAPLUSTOLL , 1997 .

[34]  H. van Keulen,et al.  The 'School of de Wit' crop growth simulation models: a pedigree and historical overview. , 1996 .

[35]  Marshall J. English,et al.  Deficit irrigation. I. Analytical framework , 1990 .

[36]  T. Hsiao.  Plant Responses to Water Stress , 1973 .

[37]  S. Lebonvallet.  Implantation du quinoa et simulation de sa culture sur l'altiplano bolivien , 2008 .

[38]  S. Comai,et al.  The content of proteic and nonproteic (free and protein-bound) tryptophan in quinoa and cereal flours , 2007 .

[39]  D. Raes,et al.  Response of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to differential drought stress in the Bolivian Altiplano: Towards a deficit irrigation strategy within a water scarce region , 2006 .

[40]  R. Siener,et al.  Oxalate contents of species of the Polygonaceae, Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae families , 2006 .

[41]  T. Addiscott.  Modeling: potential and limitations , 2003 .

[42]  D. Benbi,et al.  Handbook of processes and modeling in the soil-plant system. , 2003 .

[43]  T. Oweis,et al.  Improving water productivity in the dry areas of West Asia and North Africa , 2003 .

[44]  M. Cardenas.  Agroclimatic study and drought resistance analysis of Quinoa for an irrigation strategy in the Bolivian Altiplano , 2003 .

[45]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  An overview of the crop model STICS , 2003 .

[46]  C. Stöckle,et al.  CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model , 2003 .

[47]  James W. Jones,et al.  The DSSAT cropping system model , 2003 .

[48]  Heping Zhang,et al.  Water-yield relations and optimal irrigation scheduling of wheat in the Mediterranean region , 1999 .

[49]  S. Jacobsen,et al.  QUINOA: A POTENTIAL DROUGHT RESISTANT CROP FOR THE BRAZILIAN SAVANNAH , 1998 .

[50]  S. Jacobsen.  Developmental stability of quinoa under European conditions , 1998 .

[51]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  Crop growth and development. , 1995 .

[52]  K. Loague,et al.  Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application , 1991 .