Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: A method for supply base reduction

Abstract Development of partnership with suppliers is widely recognised today as a potent tool for supply chain improvement. To develop an effective partnership, it is necessary to have a small supply base and an effort to reduce the supply base to a manageable level. Despite its overwhelming importance, models of supply base reduction are rare. Supplier sorting methods, used for pre-selection of suppliers and sometimes seen as methods for supply base reduction, have limitations ranging from (1) requirement of an exhaustive database of historical information (case-based reasoning), (2) inability to predefine the number of elements in a cluster (cluster analysis) and (3) inability to identify suppliers who are both highly capable as well as high performers (data envelopment analysis). In the present work, we develop a systematic framework for carrying out the supply base reduction process. The study assumes two important dimensions of suppliers— performance and capability . Performance of a supplier represents short-term effects on the achievement of supply chain objectives while supplier capability indicates long-term effects. Many of the performance and capability factors are imprecise in nature. In order to account for the imprecision involved in numerous subjective characteristics of suppliers, we use fuzzy set approach to measure the imprecision of these factors and rank a potential list of suppliers against their performance and capability. We then display their ranks in a ‘capability–performance matrix’ that helps a decision maker arrange the suppliers in decreasing order of preference. The desired numbers of suppliers are finally selected on the basis of this ordered list. The suggested framework will be of immense help to the practising managers in reducing the supply base—a prerequisite for building a strong supplier partnership and developing an effective supply chain.

[1]  Shad Dowlatshahi,et al.  DESIGNER-BUYER-SUPPLIER INTERFACE: THEORY VERSUS PRACTICE , 2000 .

[2]  Robert M. Monczka,et al.  Cost-Based Supplier Performance Evaluation , 1988 .

[3]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain , 1996 .

[4]  Klas Eric Soderquist,et al.  Portfolio approaches to procurement , 2000 .

[5]  L. V. D. Wegen,et al.  Outranking methods in support of supplier selection , 1998 .

[6]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP , 2003 .

[7]  M. Braglia,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Principal Component Analysis , 2000 .

[8]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  From Computing with Numbers to Computing with Words - from Manipulation of Measurements to Manipulation of Perceptions , 2005, Logic, Thought and Action.

[9]  F. Roodhooft,et al.  A Mathematical Programming Approach for Procurement Using Activity Based Costing , 2000 .

[10]  Ralph Kauffman,et al.  An optimization approach to business buyer choice sets: How many suppliers should be included? , 2005 .

[11]  Paul D. Larson,et al.  Single Sourcing and Supplier Certification: Performance and Relationship Implications , 1998 .

[12]  William R. Soukup,et al.  SUPPLIER SELECTION STRATEGIES , 1987 .

[13]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Amy Z. Zeng,et al.  How many suppliers are best? A decision-analysis approach , 2004 .

[15]  John R. Current,et al.  Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  I. Santa Cruz,et al.  FEWER SOURCES, FEWER HEADACHES , 1997 .

[17]  Daniel L. Smytka,et al.  Total Cost Supplier Selection Model: A Case Study , 1993 .

[18]  Madan M. Gupta,et al.  Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science , 1988 .

[19]  H. Zimmerman Using fuzzy sets in operational research , 1983 .

[20]  L. Ellram,et al.  A Portfolio Approach to Supplier-Relationships , 1997 .

[21]  C. Weber,et al.  Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tool for buyers , 1996 .

[22]  Edward N. Timmerman An Approach to Vendor Performance Evaluation , 1986 .

[23]  Zeger Degraeve,et al.  Determining sourcing strategies: a decision model based on activity and cost driver information , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[24]  P. Anand Raj,et al.  Ranking alternatives with fuzzy weights using maximizing set and minimizing set , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[25]  David Parker,et al.  The economics of partnership sourcing versus adversarial competition: a critique , 1997 .

[26]  Constantine S. Katsikeas,et al.  Supply source selection criteria: The impact of supplier performance on distributor performance , 2004 .

[27]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Progress towards buyer-supplier partnerships: Evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturing firms , 1996 .

[28]  Henry C. W. Lau,et al.  A knowledge-based supplier intelligence retrieval system for outsource manufacturing , 2005, Knowl. Based Syst..

[29]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Supplier Evaluation and Rationalization via Data Envelopment Analysis: An Empirical Examination , 2001 .

[30]  Boaz Ronen,et al.  A Decision Support System for Purchasing Management of Large Projects: Special Focus Article , 1988, Oper. Res..

[31]  Zeger Degraeve,et al.  Improving the efficiency of the purchasing process using total cost of ownership information: The case of heating electrodes at Cockerill Sambre S.A , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Anna Dubois,et al.  Strategic cost management across boundaries of firms , 2003 .

[33]  Paul D. Cousins,et al.  Supply base rationalisation: myth or reality? , 1999 .

[34]  Sang-Chan Park,et al.  An effective supplier selection method for constructing a competitive supply-relationship , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Tarik Aouam,et al.  Fuzzy MADM: An outranking method , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Shan-Huo Chen Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set , 1985 .

[37]  R. Narasimhan An Analytical Approach to Supplier Selection , 1983 .

[38]  Birsen Karpak,et al.  An application of visual interactive goal programming: a case in vendor selection decisions , 1999 .

[39]  C. Swift Preferences for single sourcing and supplier selection criteria , 1995 .

[40]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Vendor selection criteria and methods , 1991 .

[41]  Semra Birgün Barla A case study of supplier selection for lean supply by using a mathematical model , 2003 .

[42]  C. Bechtel,et al.  MRO Partnerships: A Case Study , 1997 .

[43]  Gary David Holt,et al.  WHICH CONTRACTOR SELECTION METHODOLOGY , 1998 .

[44]  C. Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods And Applications , 1996 .

[45]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[46]  P. Anand Raj,et al.  Ranking multi-criterion river basin planning alternatives using fuzzy numbers , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[47]  P. Turnbull,et al.  Do relationship portfolios and networks provide the key to successful relationship management , 2002 .

[48]  Robert J. Vokurka,et al.  A prototype expert system for the evaluation and selection of potential suppliers , 1996 .

[49]  L. D. Boer,et al.  A review of methods supporting supplier selection , 2001 .

[50]  Marcus Jefferies,et al.  A strategy for evaluating a fuzzy case-based construction procurement selection system , 2006, Adv. Eng. Softw..