An analysis of learning interactions in a cross-border network for sustainable urban neighbourhood development

Learning networks have the potential to support joint learning and collective innovation processes needed for sustainable urban development. However, systematic analyses of joint learning processes in such networks are often lacking. In this paper, the Interreg project SUN (Sustainable Urban Neighbourhoods) is taken as a case study to analyse learning interactions in a regional network for sustainable urban neighbourhood development in the Euregio Meuse-Rhine. The SUN project provides concerted public and private action, focussing on community engagement, cross-border cooperation, and collective innovation. In this context, joint learning implies the exchange and co-production of knowledge among a diverse group of actors. We first describe the learning network of SUN in terms of the actors involved, the learning activities and tools applied, and the types of knowledge exchanged and co-produced (technical, attitudinal, innovative). These features are further used to characterize a set of typical learning interactions that generated learning across four main knowledge boundaries (territorial, role-based, sectoral, and project boundaries). From this analysis, we identify main factors supporting the joint learning process, and discuss the general applicability and added value of the developed analytical framework.

[1]  Colin J. Bennett,et al.  The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change , 1992 .

[2]  Samuel B. Moore,et al.  Creating and managing a virtual inter-organizational learning network for greener production: a conceptual model and case study , 2006 .

[3]  T. Lynam,et al.  A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management , 2007 .

[4]  M. Kerkhof,et al.  Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: Methodological considerations , 2005 .

[5]  F. Malmborg Stimulating learning and innovation in networks for regional sustainable development: the role of local authorities , 2007 .

[6]  Carel Dieperink,et al.  Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action , 2012 .

[7]  Eberhard Jochem,et al.  Local learning-networks on energy efficiency in industry - Successful initiative in Germany , 2007 .

[8]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[9]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[10]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[12]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social Learning and Water Resources Management , 2007 .

[13]  Colin McFarlane,et al.  Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage , 2011 .

[14]  A. B. Atiti Multi-Actor Learning for Sustainable Regional Development in Europe: A Handbook of Best Practice, Andrew Barton, Jana Dlouhá (Eds.). Grosvenor House Publishing, Guildford (2011), 343, (pbk), ISBN: 978 1 908105 33 2 , 2013 .

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[16]  S. L. Manring Creating and Managing Interorganizational Learning Networks To Achieve Sustainable Ecosystem Management , 2007 .

[17]  Pieter Valkering,et al.  Learning for sustainable regional development: Towards learning networks 2.0? , 2013 .

[18]  N. Odendaal,et al.  Integrated area development projects: Working towards innovation and sustainability , 2004 .

[19]  Derek R. Armitage,et al.  Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning , 2008 .

[20]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Meg Holden,et al.  Social learning in planning: Seattle's sustainable development codebooks , 2008 .

[22]  Pieter Valkering,et al.  Design of a Quality-of-Life monitor to promote learning in a multi-actor network for sustainable urban development , 2013 .

[23]  B. Verspagen,et al.  Systems of Innovation , 2009 .

[24]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[25]  Irene Guijt,et al.  Continual learning for agroforestry system design: university, NGO and farmer partnership in Minas Gerais, Brazil , 2001 .

[26]  Ivo Wenzler,et al.  Learning through games? Evaluating the learning effect of a policy exercise on European climate policy , 2011 .

[27]  E. Swyngedouw,et al.  Politics, Institutions and Regional Restructuring Processes: From Managed Growth to Planned Fragmentation in the Reconversion of Belgium's Last Coal Mining Region , 1999 .

[28]  A. Veldkamp,et al.  Triggering transitions towards sustainable development of the Dutch agricultural sector: TransForum’s approach , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[29]  Jens Bjornavold,et al.  Validation of Formal, Non-Formal and Informal Learning: policy and practices in EU Member States1 , 2004 .

[30]  N. Roome Conceptualizing and studying the contribution of networks in environmental management and sustainable development , 2001 .

[31]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[32]  John Bessant,et al.  Developing learning networks , 2005, AI & SOCIETY.

[33]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .