Scalable approach to high coverages on oxides via iterative training of a machine‐learning algorithm

Understanding the interaction of multiple types of adsorbate molecules on solid surfaces is crucial to establishing the stability of catalysts under various chemical environments. Computational studies on the high coverage and mixed coverages of reaction intermediates are still challenging, especially for transition‐metal compounds. In this work, we present a framework to predict differential adsorption energies and identify low‐energy structures under high‐ and mixed‐adsorbate coverages on oxide materials. The approach uses Gaussian process machine‐learning models with quantified uncertainty in conjunction with an iterative training algorithm to actively identify the training set. The framework is demonstrated for the mixed adsorption of CHx, NHx and OHx species on the oxygen vacancy and pristine rutile TiO2(110) surface sites. The results indicate that the proposed algorithm is highly efficient at identifying the most valuable training data, and is able to predict differential adsorption energies with a mean absolute error of ∼0.3 eV based on <25 % of the total DFT data. The algorithm is also used to identify 76 % of the low‐energy structures based on <30 % of the total DFT data, enabling construction of surface phase diagrams that account for high and mixed coverage as a function of the chemical potential of C, H, O, and N. Furthermore, the computational scaling indicates the algorithm scales nearly linearly (N1.12) as the number of adsorbates increases. This framework can be directly extended to metals, metal oxides, and other materials, providing a practical route toward the investigation of the behavior of catalysts under high‐coverage conditions.

[1]  Andrew J. Medford,et al.  The Role of Adventitious Carbon in Photo-catalytic Nitrogen Fixation by Titania. , 2018, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Michael Walter,et al.  The atomic simulation environment-a Python library for working with atoms. , 2017, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[3]  J. Yates,et al.  Adsorption of NO on the TiO2(110) Surface: An Experimental and Theoretical Study , 2000 .

[4]  Jacob R. Boes,et al.  Graph Theory Approach to High-Throughput Surface Adsorption Structure Generation. , 2019, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[5]  Ryosuke Jinnouchi,et al.  Predicting Catalytic Activity of Nanoparticles by a DFT-Aided Machine-Learning Algorithm. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[6]  R. Maezono,et al.  DFT  +  U study of H2O adsorption and dissociation on stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric CuO(1 1 1) surfaces , 2019, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[7]  Andrew J. Medford,et al.  Analysis of Photocatalytic Nitrogen Fixation on Rutile TiO$_2$(110) , 2017, 1707.03031.

[8]  J. Yates,et al.  TI3+ DEFECT SITES ON TIO2(110) : PRODUCTION AND CHEMICAL DETECTION OF ACTIVE SITES , 1994 .

[9]  H. Metiu,et al.  Chemistry of Lewis Acid–Base Pairs on Oxide Surfaces , 2012 .

[10]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[11]  Seungwu Han,et al.  SIMPLE-NN: An efficient package for training and executing neural-network interatomic potentials , 2019, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[12]  H. Metiu,et al.  Choice of U for DFT+U Calculations for Titanium Oxides , 2011 .

[13]  C. Minot,et al.  A theoretical analysis of NH3 adsorption on TiO2 , 1996 .

[14]  S. Fabris,et al.  CO Adsorption and Oxidation on Ceria Surfaces from DFT+U Calculations , 2008 .

[15]  M. E. A. Dompablo,et al.  DFT+U calculations of crystal lattice, electronic structure, and phase stability under pressure of TiO2 polymorphs. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[16]  J. Yates,et al.  Photochemistry of NO Chemisorbed on TiO2(110) and TiO2 Powders , 2000 .

[17]  S. H. Mushrif,et al.  Influence of Hubbard U Parameter in Simulating Adsorption and Reactivity on CuO: Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study , 2017 .

[18]  H. Metiu,et al.  Acid–Base Interaction and Its Role in Alkane Dissociative Chemisorption on Oxide Surfaces , 2014 .

[19]  Jörg Behler,et al.  Constructing high‐dimensional neural network potentials: A tutorial review , 2015 .

[20]  Jacek K. Stolarczyk,et al.  Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 on TiO2 and other semiconductors. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[21]  Peter Sollich,et al.  Accurate interatomic force fields via machine learning with covariant kernels , 2016, 1611.03877.

[22]  G. Thornton,et al.  Structure of clean and adsorbate-covered single-crystal rutile TiO2 surfaces. , 2013, Chemical reviews.

[23]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[24]  Jing Shen,et al.  Catalysts and Reaction Pathways for the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry letters.