Did He Jump or Was He Pushed? Abductive Practical Reasoning

In this paper we present an approach to abductive reasoning in law by examining it in the context of an argumentation scheme for practical reasoning. We present a particular scheme, based on an established scheme for practical reasoning, that can be used to reason abductively about how an agent might have acted to reach a particular scenario, and the motivations for doing so. Plausibility here depends on a satisfactory explanation of why this particular agent followed these motivations in the particular situation. The scheme is given a formal grounding in terms of Action-based Alternating Transition Systems and we illustrate the approach with a running legal example.

[1]  N. Pennington,et al.  The story model for juror decision making , 1993 .

[2]  H. Crombag,et al.  Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence , 1994 .

[3]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon.  Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[5]  Paul Thagard,et al.  CAUSAL INFERENCE IN LEGAL DECISION MAKING: EXPLANATORY COHERENCE VS. BAYESIAN NETWORKS , 2004, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[6]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  On obligations and normative ability: Towards a logical analysis of the social contract , 2005, J. Appl. Log..

[7]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Computational Representation of Practical Argument , 2006, Synthese.

[8]  Sanjay Modgil,et al.  Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks , 2006, COMMA.

[9]  Douglas Walton.  Character Evidence, An Abductive Theory , 2006, Argumentation Library.

[10]  Douglas Walton.  Character Evidence: An Abductive Theory (Argumentation Library) , 2006 .

[11]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[12]  D. Walton,et al.  Arthur, George and the Mystery of the Missing Motive: Towards a Theory of Evidentiary Reasoning about Motives , 2007 .

[13]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence , 2007, ICAIL.