Information search and choice accuracy as a function of task complexity and task structure

Abstract Previous research has consistently shown that subjects switch to noncompensatory information search behaviour when task complexity increases. However, a rather specific class of tasks was used in these studies for which complete information search is not necessary to attain accurate task performance. In the present study information search behaviour, choice accuracy, subjective difficulty and confidence were registered under various task complexity conditions in two different task environments. In the first task, subjects had to make a choice between apartments; in the second task, a choice was required between baskets containing groceries of different prices. Forty subjects made choices by means of computerized information boards. The results showed effects of both complexity and type of task on information search behaviour. The lowest proportion of requested information and the most variable search pattern was observed for the apartments task in the complex task condition. However, accuracy remained constant over all complexity conditions. Together, the results suggest that under high task complexity levels subjects try to work smarter rather than harder. In the context of a choice requirement the specific task structure may allow them to switch to noncompensatory strategies while maintaining accuracy and avoiding the integration of large amounts of information.

[1]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  Linear regression and process-tracing models of judgment. , 1979 .

[2]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[3]  J. Ford,et al.  Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions , 1989 .

[4]  Oswald Huber The Information Presented and Actually Processed in a Decision Task , 1983 .

[5]  Robert S. Billings,et al.  Measures of compensatory and noncompensatory models of decision behavior: Process tracing versus policy capturing , 1983 .

[6]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[8]  John W. Payne,et al.  The Impact of accuracy and effort feedback and goals on adaptive decision behavior , 1990 .

[9]  O. Svenson Process descriptions of decision making. , 1979 .

[10]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[11]  G. Sundström Information search and decision making: The effects of information displays , 1987 .

[12]  N. Klein,et al.  Utility and decision strategies: a second look at the rational decision maker. , 1983, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[13]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[14]  I. Levin,et al.  Confidence in judgments based on incomplete information: An investigation using both hypothetical and real gambles , 1988 .

[15]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  Making judgments when information is missing: inferences, biases, and framing effects. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[16]  Dane K. Peterson,et al.  Confidence, uncertainty, and the use of information , 1988 .

[17]  Richard W. Olshavsky,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: A replication and extension , 1979 .

[18]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[19]  Ip Levin,et al.  Confidence in judgments based on incomplete information , 1986 .

[20]  Laurence R. Paquette,et al.  The effect of decision strategy and task complexity on decision performance in an accounting context , 1988 .

[21]  D Zakay,et al.  Time pressure, training and decision effectiveness. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[22]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis , 1980 .