Using heuristic multi-objective optimization for quantifying predictive uncertainty associated with groundwater flow and reactive transport models

Abstract Water resources management often involves models that simulate physical/chemical processes to make predictions of future system behavior. These predictions often contain uncertainty that must be considered in order to make robust decisions. The quantification of this uncertainty is often not conducted in practice due to computational limitations and a lack of flexible software capabilities. To bridge this gap, we have developed a heuristic, multi-objective, model-independent optimization methodology using TCP/IP network communications for parallel run management on high-performance computing systems. The proposed optimization methodology is based on Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), where the memory-like nature of PSO makes it ideal for tracing a Pareto front that graphically illustrates the trade-off between competing objective functions. Although the focus of this study is on addressing the likelihood of an undesirable or contested model prediction, the proposed methodology can be extended to any multi-objective optimization context, and is also able to handle inequality constraints that reflect additional conditions that must be met along the front. We have demonstrated the algorithm on two important real-world case studies. The first case study involved water allocation issues in Antelope Valley, California, USA, where the uncertainty in total natural recharge into the valley has raised significant debates over water management. The second case study involved the re-injection of coal seam gas co-produced water into deep aquifers in the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia, where the potential impact of an undesired mobilization of arsenic concentrations needed to be understood and managed. This case study required a highly nonlinear field-scale reactive transport model, and an inequality constraint was also necessary to maintain consistency with a laboratory-scale geochemical model. The efficiency at which the proposed methodology solved these complex case studies demonstrates its effectiveness for a broad range of applications.

[1]  H. Prommer,et al.  Identifying and Quantifying the Intermediate Processes during Nitrate-Dependent Iron(II) Oxidation. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  J. Doherty,et al.  Calibration‐constrained Monte Carlo analysis of highly parameterized models using subspace techniques , 2009 .

[3]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  Multiobjective optimization using dynamic neighborhood particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).

[4]  H. Prommer,et al.  Evaluation of conceptual and numerical models for arsenic mobilization and attenuation during managed aquifer recharge. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Frank Kursawe,et al.  A Variant of Evolution Strategies for Vector Optimization , 1990, PPSN.

[6]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Reducing the Time Complexity of the Derandomized Evolution Strategy with Covariance Matrix Adaptation (CMA-ES) , 2003, Evolutionary Computation.

[7]  H. Prommer,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Arsenic Mobility during Reductive Iron-Mineral Transformations. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  H. Prommer,et al.  Model-Based Analysis of Arsenic Immobilization via Iron Mineral Transformation under Advective Flows. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Luis A. Bastidas,et al.  Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for parameter estimation in hydrology , 2006 .

[10]  M.N. Vrahatis,et al.  Particle swarm optimizers for Pareto optimization with enhanced archiving techniques , 2003, The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC '03..

[11]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization for Single Objective Continuous Space Problems: A Review , 2017, Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  John Doherty,et al.  A short exploration of structural noise , 2010 .

[13]  John Doherty,et al.  Efficient regularization and uncertainty analysis using a global optimization methodology , 2010 .

[14]  David J. Dahlstrom Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Complex Environmental Models , 2015 .

[15]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  Chukwudi Anyakoha,et al.  A review of particle swarm optimization. Part II: hybridisation, combinatorial, multicriteria and constrained optimization, and indicative applications , 2008, Natural Computing.

[17]  Jasper A Vrugt,et al.  Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  D. Higdon,et al.  Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling , 2009 .

[19]  Yongming Han,et al.  Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving , 2017 .

[20]  H. Prommer,et al.  Process-based reactive transport model to quantify arsenic mobility during aquifer storage and recovery of potable water. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  J. Vrugt,et al.  Comparison of Three Multiobjective Optimization Algorithms for Inverse Modeling of Vadose Zone Hydraulic Properties , 2008 .

[22]  Peter M. Martin,et al.  Natural recharge estimation and uncertainty analysis of an adjudicated groundwater basin using a regional-scale flow and subsidence model (Antelope Valley, California, USA) , 2015, Hydrogeology Journal.

[23]  H. Prommer,et al.  Processes governing arsenic retardation on Pleistocene sediments: Adsorption experiments and model‐based analysis , 2017 .

[24]  Michael N. Fienen,et al.  A python framework for environmental model uncertainty analysis , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  Darrell G. Fontane,et al.  Use of Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization in Water Resources Management , 2008 .

[26]  D. A. Barry,et al.  MODFLOW/MT3DMS‐Based Reactive Multicomponent Transport Modeling , 2003, Ground water.

[27]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms: Problem Difficulties and Construction of Test Problems , 1999, Evolutionary Computation.

[28]  Hajime Kita,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization by Means of the Thermodynamical Genetic Algorithm , 1996, PPSN.

[29]  J. Doherty R.Vogwill,et al.  Models, decision-making and science , 2016 .

[30]  D. Kent,et al.  Application of the Surface Complexation Concept to Complex Mineral Assemblages , 1998 .

[31]  H. Prommer,et al.  Deoxygenation Prevents Arsenic Mobilization during Deepwell Injection into Sulfide-Bearing Aquifers. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[33]  A. Siade,et al.  A Practical, Robust Methodology for Acquiring New Observation Data Using Computationally Expensive Groundwater Models , 2017 .

[34]  Lingfeng Wang,et al.  Stochastic economic emission load dispatch through a modified particle swarm optimization algorithm , 2008 .

[35]  H. Prommer,et al.  Using Reactive Transport Models to Quantify and Predict Groundwater Quality , 2019, Elements.

[36]  H. Prommer,et al.  Multiscale Characterization and Quantification of Arsenic Mobilization and Attenuation During Injection of Treated Coal Seam Gas Coproduced Water into Deep Aquifers , 2017 .