From genomics to proteomics

Proteomics is the study of the function of all expressed proteins. Tremendous progress has been made in the past few years in generating large-scale data sets for protein–protein interactions, organelle composition, protein activity patterns and protein profiles in cancer patients. But further technological improvements, organization of international proteomics projects and open access to results are needed for proteomics to fulfil its potential.

[1]  S. Fields,et al.  A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions , 1989, Nature.

[2]  D. Hochstrasser,et al.  From Proteins to Proteomes: Large Scale Protein Identification by Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis and Arnino Acid Analysis , 1996, Bio/Technology.

[3]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  S. Huang,et al.  Shape-dependent control of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis: switching between attractors in cell regulatory networks. , 2000, Experimental cell research.

[5]  Phillip D. Zamore,et al.  RNA Interference , 2000, Science.

[6]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants , 2001, Science.

[8]  E. Marshall.  Bermuda Rules: Community Spirit, With Teeth , 2001, Science.

[9]  Roger E Bumgarner,et al.  Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. , 2001, Science.

[10]  M. Mann,et al.  Directed Proteomic Analysis of the Human Nucleolus , 2002, Current Biology.

[11]  Marc Vidal,et al.  Integrating Interactome, Phenome, and Transcriptome Mapping Data for the C. elegans Germline , 2002, Current Biology.

[12]  K. Gould,et al.  Proteomics Analysis Identifies New Components of the Fission and Budding Yeast Anaphase-Promoting Complexes , 2002, Current Biology.

[13]  Peter S Linsley,et al.  Recent developments in DNA microarrays. , 2002, Current opinion in microbiology.

[14]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Clinical proteomics: translating benchside promise into bedside reality , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  R. Aebersold,et al.  The need for national centers for proteomics , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Systematic Identification of Pathways That Couple Cell Growth and Division in Yeast , 2002, Science.

[17]  R. Gerlai.  Phenomics: fiction or the future? , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  G. Hannon.  RNA interference : RNA , 2002 .

[19]  Gavin MacBeath,et al.  Protein microarrays and proteomics , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[20]  Philip Ball.  Data visualization: Picture this , 2002, Nature.

[21]  H. Kitano.  Systems Biology: A Brief Overview , 2002, Science.

[22]  Stuart L. Schreiber,et al.  Dissecting glucose signalling with diversity-oriented synthesis and small-molecule microarrays , 2002, Nature.

[23]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[25]  J. Blenis,et al.  Identification of the tuberous sclerosis complex-2 tumor suppressor gene product tuberin as a target of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/akt pathway. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[26]  John R Yates,et al.  Multidimensional separations for protein/peptide analysis in the post-genomic era. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[27]  M. Mann,et al.  Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.