DEFINING AND MEASURING VOICE QUALITY

Although voices provide listeners with significant information about speakers, defining and quantifying voice quality remain elusive goals. The ANSI standard definition of quality (that attribute of auditory sensation in terms of which a listener can judge that two sounds similarly presented and having the same loudness and pitch are dissimilar) is often criticized because it specifies what quality is not, rather than what it is. It has also proven difficult to devise measurement protocols for quality as specified in the ANSI definition. We argue that the ANSI definition is in fact appropriate, because it treats quality as the result of perceptual processes— interactions between listeners and signals in the context of specific perceptual goals. Application of speech synthesis in method-of-adjustment tasks allows measurement of quality psychoacoustically as those aspects of the signal that allow a listener to determine that two sounds of equal pitch and loudness are different, consistent with the ANSI definition, and provides insight into the salient acoustic attributes contributing to quality. This technique holds promise for improving the reliability and validity of measures of voice quality.

[1]  N. Isshiki,et al.  Differential diagnosis of hoarseness. , 1969, Folia phoniatrica.

[2]  D Michaelis,et al.  Acoustic voice analysis by means of the hoarseness diagram. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  J Kreiman,et al.  Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  T Murry,et al.  Multidimensional classification of abnormal voice qualities. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M. P. Gelfer Perceptual attributes of voice: Development and use of rating scales , 1988 .

[6]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Listener experience and perception of voice quality. , 1990 .

[8]  Classification of Complex Nonspeech Sounds , 1992 .

[9]  Markus Bodden,et al.  Instrumentation for Sound Quality Evaluation , 1997 .

[10]  John H. Esling,et al.  The VoQS System for the Transcription of Voice Quality , 1995, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[11]  J Kreiman,et al.  The perceptual structure of pathologic voice quality. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  G Molenberghs,et al.  The dysphonia severity index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  S. Hiki,et al.  Multidimensional representation of personal quality of vowels and its acoustical correlates , 1973 .

[14]  M. P. Gelfer A multidimensional scaling study of voice quality in females. , 1993, Phonetica.

[15]  J. Laver The phonetic description of voice quality , 1980 .

[16]  T Murry,et al.  Multidimensional analysis of male and female voices. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Jody Kreiman,et al.  Comparing discrimination and recognition of unfamiliar voices , 1991, Speech Commun..

[18]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Individual differences in voice quality perception. , 1992 .

[19]  T Murry,et al.  Multidimensional classification of normal voice qualities. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  G. de Krom,et al.  Consistency and reliability of voice quality ratings for different types of speech fragments. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  Reinier Plomp,et al.  Aspects of tone sensation , 1976 .

[22]  Lou Boves,et al.  Analysis of the perceptual qualities of Dutch speakers' voice and pronunciation , 1983, Speech Commun..

[23]  J. Sundberg,et al.  The Science of Singing Voice , 1987 .

[24]  W. V. Dommelen Acoustic parameters in human speaker recognition. , 1990 .

[25]  G. Gescheider,et al.  Stimulus context and absolute magnitude estimation: A study of individual differences , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  D. Lancker,et al.  Familiar voice recognition: Patterns and parameters. Part I. Recognition of backward voices , 1985 .

[27]  J. Laver,et al.  Voice quality and indexical information. , 1968, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[28]  J. Sundberg,et al.  Perceptual and acoustic correlates of abnormal voice qualities. , 1980, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[29]  L E Marks,et al.  Interaction among auditory dimensions: Timbre, pitch, and loudness , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  D. Lancker,et al.  Familiar voice recognition: Parameters and patterns. Part II. Recognition of rate-altered voices , 1985 .

[31]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[32]  J Kreiman,et al.  Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[33]  W. Voiers Perceptual Bases of Speaker Identity , 1964 .

[34]  M. Hirano,et al.  Clinical Examination of Voice , 1981 .