Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
暂无分享,去创建一个
SummaryHirsch (2005) has proposed the h-index as a single-number criterion to evaluate the scientific output of a researcher (Ball, 2005): A scientist has index h if h of his/her Np papers have at least h citations each, and the other (Np − h) papers have fewer than h citations each. In a study on committee peer review (Bornmann & Daniel, 2005) we found that on average the h-index for successful applicants for post-doctoral research fellowships was consistently higher than for non-successful applicants.
[1] J. Hirsch. An index to quantify an individual's scientific output , 2005 .
[2] J. E. Hirsch,et al. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
[3] S. Cole. Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists , 1989 .
[4] Philip Ball,et al. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists , 2005, Nature.