Assessing for Learning: Some Dimensions Underlying New Approaches to Educational Assessment.

La theorie et la pratique de l'evaluation de l'apprentissage subissent un changement de forme. La raison principale de ce changement est que l'orientation de l'evaluation doit etre d'ordre pedagogique et non politique ou psychometrique. Les trois dimensions presentes dans les differents modes d'evaluation sont la mesure, l'approche qualitative ou quantitative et le cadre de realisation du test. L'A. etudie les differents modeles d'evaluation issues de ces variables

[1]  Ginette Delandshere,et al.  Capturing Teachers' Knowledge: Performance Assessment , 1994 .

[2]  Catherine S. Taylor.  Assessment for Measurement or Standards: The Peril and Promise of Large-Scale Assessment Reform , 1994 .

[3]  S. Messick.  The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of Performance Assessments , 1994 .

[4]  Pamela A. Moss,et al.  Can There Be Validity Without Reliability? , 1994 .

[5]  David J. Bateson.  Psychometric and Philosophic Problems in "Authentic" Assessment: Performance Tasks and Portfolios. , 1994 .

[6]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science , 1994 .

[7]  John O. Anderson,et al.  Elementary Teachers’ Assessment Practices as Observed in the Province of British Columbia , 1994 .

[8]  John Biggs,et al.  Who Benefits from Mastery Learning , 1994 .

[9]  Dan G. Bachor.  Classroom Assessment and the Relationship to Representativeness, Accuracy, and Consistency. , 1994 .

[10]  D. Lohman.  Teaching and Testing to Develop Fluid Abilities , 1993 .

[11]  G. Cizek.  Rethinking Psychometricians’ Beliefs About Learning , 1993 .

[12]  J. Biggs,et al.  From Theory to Practice: A Cognitive Systems Approach , 1993 .

[13]  L. Shepard.  Chapter 9: Evaluating Test Validity , 1993 .

[14]  Martha S. Hendricks-Lee,et al.  An ecological conception of teaching , 1993 .

[15]  J. Hattie,et al.  Construct validity and achievement assessment , 1993 .

[16]  P. Moss.  Shifting Conceptions of Validity in Educational Measurement: Implications for Performance Assessment , 1992 .

[17]  Stephen B. Dunbar,et al.  Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria , 1991 .

[18]  L. Shepard.  Psychometricians’ Beliefs About Learning , 1991 .

[19]  Ronald N. Marso,et al.  An analysis of teacher-made tests: Item types, cognitive demands, and item construction errors , 1991 .

[20]  Howard Gardner,et al.  To Use Their Minds Well: Investigating New Forms of Student Assessment , 1991 .

[21]  Edward H. Haertel.  New Forms of Teacher Assessment , 1991 .

[22]  N. Cole.  Conceptions of Educational Achievement , 1990 .

[23]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  A Systems Approach to Educational Testing , 1989 .

[24]  S. Messick.  Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment , 1989 .

[25]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[26]  G. Wiggins.  Teaching to the (Authentic) Test. , 1989 .

[27]  T. Crooks.  The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students , 1988 .

[28]  Peter W. Hill,et al.  Reforming the Assessment of Student Achievement in the Senior Secondary School , 1988 .

[29]  P. Ramsden.  Improving Learning: New Perspectives , 1988 .

[30]  W. Reid,et al.  Institutions and Practices: Professional Education Reports and the Language of Reform , 1987 .

[31]  W. James Popham,et al.  The Merits of Measurement-Driven Instruction. , 1987 .

[32]  N. Frederiksen.  The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. , 1984 .

[33]  J. Biggs,et al.  The Process of Learning , 1981 .

[34]  B. Wright,et al.  Best Test Design. Rasch Measurement. , 1979 .

[35]  J. B. Biggs.  Study Behaviour and Performance in Objective and Essay Formats , 1973 .

[36]  T. R. Husek,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF CRITERION‐REFERENCED MEASUREMENT1,2 , 1969 .

[37]  B. Hoffmann.  The tyranny of testing , 1962 .