Estimating above-ground biomass and production in mangrove communities of Biscayne National Park, Florida (U.S.A.)

Total above-ground production isusually estimated by a combination of allometry andlitter collection. However, in coastal sites that aretidally influenced, or in juvenile or dwarf forestswhere the crown bases of dominant individuals maybegin within a few decimeters of ground level,estimates of community leaf production that depend onlitter collection may not be feasible. Thus, in thispaper, we present 1) allometric equations that allowaccurate estimation of total above-ground biomass ofthree mangrove species (Rhizophora mangle, Laguncularia racemosa, and Avicennia germinans)in very small to medium size classes, and 2) analternative method of estimating total above-groundproduction that overcomes the limitations of littercollection. The method we employ to estimate mangroveproductivity is an adaptation for woody plantcommunities of a procedure introduced by Dai andWeigert (1996) for grasslands. It incorporates adetailed census of all individuals within fixedsampling plots, along with periodic observations ofmarked leaf cohorts. The method allows the comparisonof biomass allocation patterns among forests thatdiffer widely in physiognomy and physiographicsetting.The method was applied to a South Florida fringemangrove forest in the early stages of recovery fromHurricane Andrew (August 1992), and an adjacent dwarfforest which was not substantially damaged by thestorm. Total above-ground production in the fringeforest from July 1996 through June 1997 was about 3times higher than dwarf forest production,26.1 Mg·ha-1·yr-1 vs.8.1 Mg·ha-1·yr-1, respectively. Furthermore, when compared to the dwarf forest, fringeproduction rates were approximately eight, six, six,and two times as high as dwarf forest rates forproproots, branches, stems, and leaves, respectively. Calculations of leaf production were based on mean redmangrove leaf longevities that ranged from about 189days to 281 days, depending on cohort and site.Repeated measures analysis of variance indicated thatleaf life spans did not differ significantly betweendwarf and fringe forests, but did differ among leafcohorts.Based on reported values for similar mangrove forests,the method provided reasonable estimates ofabove-ground biomass and production, while furnishingrelevant auxiliary information on spatial and temporalvariation in leaf demographic patterns. Furthermore,the partitioning of annual production between woodytissues and leaves followed the reported trend in mostforest ecosystems.

[1]  H. Teas.  Silviculture with saline water. , 1979 .

[2]  R. Peet.  Changes in Biomass and Production During Secondary Forest Succession , 1981 .

[3]  W. B. Smith,et al.  Allometric Biomass Equations for 98 Species of Herbs, Shrubs, and Small Trees , 1983 .

[4]  A. Lugo,et al.  The Ecology of Mangroves , 1974 .

[5]  G. Baskerville.  Use of Logarithmic Regression in the Estimation of Plant Biomass , 1972 .

[6]  John W. Day,et al.  A 7 YEAR RECORD OF ABOVE-GROUND NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION IN A SOUTHEASTERN MEXICAN MANGROVE FOREST , 1996 .

[7]  Francis E. Putz,et al.  Tree growth, dynamics and productivity in a mature mangrove forest in Malaysia , 1986 .

[8]  J. Day,et al.  The productivity and composition of Mangrove forests, Laguna de Términos, Mexico , 1987 .

[9]  A. Robertson.  Leaf-burying crabs : their influence on energy flow and export from mixed mangrove forests (Rhizophora spp.) in northeastern Australia , 1986 .

[10]  C. Woodroffe.  Studies of a mangrove basin, tuff crater, New Zealand. I: Mangrove biomass and production of detritus , 1985 .

[11]  G. M. Woodwell,et al.  DIMENSION AND PRODUCTION RELATIONS OF TREES AND SHRUBS IN THE BROOKHAVEN FOREST, NEW YORK. , 1968 .

[12]  E. Mougin,et al.  Structure, above-ground biomass and dynamics of mangrove ecosystems: new data from French Guiana , 1998, Oecologia.

[13]  D. Sprugel.  Chapter 19 – Natural Disturbance and Ecosystem Energetics , 1985 .

[14]  M. Amarasinghe,et al.  Net primary productivity of two mangrove forest stands on the northwestern coast of Sri Lanka , 1992 .

[15]  Michael B. Robblee,et al.  Mangroves, hurricanes and lightning strikes , 1994 .

[16]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Forest Ecosystems: Concepts and Management. , 1987 .

[17]  R. Wiegert,et al.  Ramet Population Dynamics and Net Aerial Primary Productivity of Spartina Alterniflora , 1996 .

[18]  M. Cannell,et al.  Dry matter partitioning in tree crops , 1985 .

[19]  J. Megonigal,et al.  Aboveground Production in Southeastern Floodplain Forests: A Test of the Subsidy-Stress Hypothesis , 1997 .

[20]  P. Tomlinson,et al.  Studies on the Growth of Red Mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.) 3. Phenology of the Shoot , 1971 .

[21]  P. Marks,et al.  THE ROLE OF PIN CHERRY (PRUNUS PENSYLVANICA L.) IN THE MAINTENANCE OF STABILITY IN NORTHERN , 1974 .

[22]  Debbie Whitall,et al.  WETLANDS , 1995, Restoration & Management Notes.

[23]  P. Saenger,et al.  Pantropical trends in mangrove above-ground biomass and annual litterfall , 1993, Oecologia.

[24]  A. Ellison,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability in growth of Rhizophora mangle saplings on coral cays: links with variation in insolation, herbivory, and local sedimentation rate , 1996 .

[25]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  Estimating plant biomass for undergrowth species of northeastern Minnesota forest communities. , 1981 .