An ensemble approach for the detection and classification of mixed pixels of remotely sensed images

Accuracy has been necessity condition to render fine spatial resolution in the mapping of land patches. Every remotely sensed image can be characterized as objects whose accuracy varies as a function of the spatial resolution. The objects can be assigned a spectral signature which demonstrates the reflection factor of the pixels. This further prompts the confusion of pixels occupying more than one class. Such pixels can be termed as mixed pixels, whereas pixels of a homogeneous class designated as pure pixels. This paper sights the mixed pixels of the satellite images and focuses on their classification employing the texture feature. The primary reason of focus on texture is that it is based on the spatial arrangement of intensities of an image. The texture features such as colour intensity, energy and local binary pattern are used to analyze the mixed pixel problem. Supervised learning techniques such as artificial neural network and ensemble bagged learning has been reviewed and compared to handle the mixed pixel issue, thus imparting better resolution.

[1]  Chun-Chieh Yang,et al.  PA—Precision Agriculture: Use of Hyperspectral Imagery for Identification of Different Fertilisation Methods with Decision-tree Technology , 2002 .

[2]  Paul Aplin,et al.  Book Review: Remote sensing and image interpretation, fourth edition , 2000 .

[3]  Janet Franklin,et al.  A Neural Network Method for Efficient Vegetation Mapping , 1999 .

[4]  Theo E. Schouten,et al.  Decomposition of mixed pixels , 1995, Remote Sensing.

[5]  G. Foody,et al.  Sub-pixel land cover composition estimation using a linear mixture model and fuzzy membership functions , 1994 .

[6]  Wenzhong Shi,et al.  Spatial-Attraction-Based Markov Random Field Approach for Classification of High Spatial Resolution Multispectral Imagery , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[7]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  The effect of training set size and composition on artificial neural network classification , 1995 .

[9]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely-sensed data , 1996 .

[10]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[11]  Sandra Lowe,et al.  Classification Methods For Remotely Sensed Data , 2016 .

[12]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  DECISION TREE BASED CLASSIFICATION OF REMOTELY SENSED DATA , 2001 .

[13]  W. B. Yates,et al.  Classification of remotely sensed data by an artificial neural network: issues related to training data characteristics , 1995 .

[14]  John B. Adams,et al.  Classification of multispectral images based on fractions of endmembers: Application to land-cover change in the Brazilian Amazon , 1995 .

[15]  Jiao Licheng Research on Computation of GLCM of Image Texture , 2006 .

[16]  S. Gerstl,et al.  Nonlinear spectral mixing models for vegetative and soil surfaces , 1994 .

[17]  C. Özkan,et al.  Comparison of maximum likelihood classification method with supervised artificial neural network algorithms for land use activities , 2004 .