Creation of RTOG compliant patient CT-atlases for automated atlas based contouring of local regional breast and high-risk prostate cancers

BackgroundIncreasing use of IMRT to treat breast and prostate cancers at high risk of regional nodal spread relies on accurate contouring of targets and organs at risk, which is subject to significant inter- and intra-observer variability. This study sought to evaluate the performance of an atlas based deformable registration algorithm to create multi-patient CT based atlases for automated contouring.MethodsBreast and prostate multi-patient CT atlases (n = 50 and 14 respectively) were constructed to be consistent with RTOG consensus contouring guidelines. A commercially available software algorithm was evaluated by comparison of atlas-predicted contours against manual contours using Dice Similarity coefficients.ResultsHigh levels of agreement were demonstrated for prediction of OAR contours of lungs, heart, femurs, and minor editing required for the CTV breast/chest wall. CTVs generated for axillary nodes, supraclavicular nodes, prostate, and pelvic nodes demonstrated modest agreement. Small and highly variable structures, such as internal mammary nodes, lumpectomy cavity, rectum, penile bulb, and seminal vesicles had poor agreement.ConclusionsA method to construct and validate performance of CT-based multi-patient atlases for automated atlas based auto-contouring has been demonstrated, and can be adopted for clinical use in planning of local regional breast and high-risk prostate radiotherapy.

[1]  J. Bellon,et al.  Variability among breast radiation oncologists in delineation of the postsurgical lumpectomy cavity. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Performance evaluation of automatic anatomy segmentation algorithm on repeat or four-dimensional computed tomography images using deformable image registration method. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  Evaluation of automatic atlas-based lymph node segmentation for head-and-neck cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Lei Dong,et al.  Reduce in variation and improve efficiency of target volume delineation by a computer-assisted system using a deformable image registration approach. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Eric Berthelet,et al.  Target volume delineation for partial breast radiotherapy planning: clinical characteristics associated with low interobserver concordance. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  M. Stock,et al.  Assessment of accuracy and efficiency of atlas-based autosegmentation for prostate radiotherapy in a variety of clinical conditions , 2012, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[7]  Farzad Khalvati,et al.  A multiphase validation of atlas-based automatic and semiautomatic segmentation strategies for prostate MRI. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  W. Woodward,et al.  Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: an RTOG Multi-Institutional and Multiobserver Study. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Michael Lock,et al.  Technology assessment of automated atlas based segmentation in prostate bed contouring , 2011, Radiation oncology.

[10]  C. Raaijmakers,et al.  Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Iddo Wernick,et al.  Atlas-based segmentation improves consistency and decreases time required for contouring postoperative endometrial cancer nodal volumes. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  RTOG GU Radiation oncology specialists reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Frederik Wenz,et al.  Performance of an atlas-based autosegmentation software for delineation of target volumes for radiotherapy of breast and anorectal cancer. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  L. Holloway,et al.  Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in tangential breast irradiation: a comparison between radiation oncologists and radiation therapists. , 2011, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[15]  M. Bollet,et al.  Simplified rules for everyday delineation of lymph node areas for breast cancer radiotherapy. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  Stewart Gaede,et al.  Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability for lung cancer target volume delineation in the 4D-CT era. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij,et al.  Multiinstitutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  B J Mijnheer,et al.  Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Michael G Jameson,et al.  A review of methods of analysis in contouring studies for radiation oncology , 2010, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[20]  C. Weltens,et al.  New trends in radiotherapy for breast cancer , 2006, Current opinion in oncology.

[21]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Variation in the definition of clinical target volumes for pelvic nodal conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Grégoire Malandain,et al.  Evaluation of an atlas-based automatic segmentation software for the delineation of brain organs at risk in a radiation therapy clinical context. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Issam El Naqa,et al.  Tools for consensus analysis of experts' contours for radiotherapy structure definitions. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  Xiao Han,et al.  Atlas-Based Auto-segmentation of Head and Neck CT Images , 2008, MICCAI.

[25]  C. Anderson,et al.  Radiation Oncology , 2001, Springer International Publishing.

[26]  R Dendale,et al.  Anatomical, clinical and radiological delineation of target volumes in breast cancer radiotherapy planning: individual variability, questions and answers. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[27]  O. Commowick,et al.  A pre-clinical assessment of an atlas-based automatic segmentation tool for the head and neck. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  Johannes Buurman,et al.  Robust segmentation of mass‐lesions in contrast‐enhanced dynamic breast MR images , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  J. F. De Los Santos,et al.  Automatic segmentation of whole breast using atlas approach and deformable image registration , 2009 .

[30]  Xiao Han,et al.  Clinical validation of atlas-based auto-segmentation of multiple target volumes and normal tissue (swallowing/mastication) structures in the head and neck. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  C. Hess,et al.  The Impact of Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) and Clinical Target Volume (CTV) Definition on the Total Accuracy in Radiotherapy , 2003, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.