Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study

Background The COVID-19 pandemic is the greatest public health crisis of the last 100 years. Countries have responded with various levels of lockdown to save lives and stop health systems from being overwhelmed. At the same time, lockdowns entail large socioeconomic costs. One exit strategy under consideration is a mobile phone app that traces the close contacts of those infected with COVID-19. Recent research has demonstrated the theoretical effectiveness of this solution in different disease settings. However, concerns have been raised about such apps because of the potential privacy implications. This could limit the acceptability of app-based contact tracing in the general population. As the effectiveness of this approach increases strongly with app uptake, it is crucial to understand public support for this intervention. Objective The objective of this study is to investigate the user acceptability of a contact-tracing app in five countries hit by the pandemic. Methods We conducted a largescale, multicountry study (N=5995) to measure public support for the digital contact tracing of COVID-19 infections. We ran anonymous online surveys in France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States. We measured intentions to use a contact-tracing app across different installation regimes (voluntary installation vs automatic installation by mobile phone providers) and studied how these intentions vary across individuals and countries. Results We found strong support for the app under both regimes, in all countries, across all subgroups of the population, and irrespective of regional-level COVID-19 mortality rates. We investigated the main factors that may hinder or facilitate uptake and found that concerns about cybersecurity and privacy, together with a lack of trust in the government, are the main barriers to adoption. Conclusions Epidemiological evidence shows that app-based contact tracing can suppress the spread of COVID-19 if a high enough proportion of the population uses the app and that it can still reduce the number of infections if uptake is moderate. Our findings show that the willingness to install the app is very high. The available evidence suggests that app-based contact tracing may be a viable approach to control the diffusion of COVID-19.

[1]  David G. Rand,et al.  Don’t get it or don’t spread it: comparing self-interested versus prosocial motivations for COVID-19 prevention behaviors , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Sarah E. Kreps,et al.  Americans' perceptions of privacy and surveillance in the COVID-19 pandemic. , 2020, PloS one.

[3]  C. Betsch,et al.  German COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) - Welle 10 (05.05.2020) , 2020 .

[4]  Peng Wu,et al.  Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study , 2020, The Lancet Public Health.

[5]  Eli P. Fenichel,et al.  Impact of school closures for COVID-19 on the US health-care workforce and net mortality: a modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Public Health.

[6]  J. Barrot,et al.  Sectoral Effects of Social Distancing , 2020, AEA Papers and Proceedings.

[7]  Marta Golin,et al.  Inequality in the Impact of the Coronavirus Shock: Evidence from Real Time Surveys , 2020, Journal of Public Economics.

[8]  Johannes Abeler,et al.  COVID-19 Contact Tracing and Data Protection Can Go Together , 2020, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[9]  Michael Gunther,et al.  Tracing Contacts to Control the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020, 2004.00517.

[10]  Hyunghoon Cho,et al.  Contact Tracing Mobile Apps for COVID-19: Privacy Considerations and Related Trade-offs , 2020, ArXiv.

[11]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand , 2020 .

[12]  Lucie Abeler-Dörner,et al.  Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing , 2020, Science.

[13]  D. Zilberman,et al.  Willingness to Pay Versus Willingness to Vote: Consumer and Voter Avoidance of Genetically Modified Foods , 2020 .

[14]  Frauke Kreuter,et al.  Willingness to Participate in Passive Mobile Data Collection , 2019, Public opinion quarterly.

[15]  A. Jäckle,et al.  Participation in a mobile app survey to collect expenditure data as part of a large-scale probability household panel: coverage and participation rates and biases , 2019 .

[16]  Alexander Wenz,et al.  Willingness to use mobile technologies for data collection in a probability household panel , 2019 .

[17]  F. Kreuter,et al.  Collecting Survey and Smartphone Sensor Data With an App: Opportunities and Challenges Around Privacy and Informed Consent , 2020, Social Science Computer Review.

[18]  Jens Hainmueller,et al.  Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  Do Intentions Really Predict Behavior? Self-Generated Validity Effects in Survey Research , 2005 .

[20]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Do Defaults Save Lives? , 2006 .

[21]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Medicine. Do defaults save lives? , 2003, Science.

[22]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[23]  C. Fraser,et al.  Effective Configurations of a Digital Contact Tracing App: A report to NHSX , 2022 .