How to Share "A Really Good Secret": Managing Sharing/Secrecy Tensions Around Scientific Knowledge Disclosure

The diffusion of scientific knowledge is critical for innovation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Yet scientists face a fundamental dilemma when it comes to sharing such knowledge: sharing can simultaneously advance and challenge both academic and commercial interests. Although several studies explore the different reasons that scientists may or may not share, along with their overall propensity to do so, we have much less insight into how researchers who confront sharing/secrecy tensions attempt to manage them. In turn, our understanding of the ways in which scientists enable cumulative innovation through sharing, even as they attend to their private interests, remains limited. Based on qualitative analysis of 46 interviews and 58 oral histories with researchers in biotechnology and digital audio, I identify 4 tactics that researchers use to manage sharing/secrecy tensions—leveraging trust, strategic withholding, delaying, and patenting—and I analyze how the use of these tactics is tied to particular sharing practices, organizational environments (e.g., universities versus firms), and scientific fields. I then theorize how these tactics address different dimensions of sharing/secrecy tensions, working together as part of an integrated repertoire. Finally, I tie my findings to broader considerations around sharing, including managerial and policy initiatives aimed at promoting cumulative innovation.

[1]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[2]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[3]  Gideon Parchomovsky,et al.  Publish or Perish , 2000 .

[4]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[5]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  W. Powell,et al.  The Knowledge Economy , 2004 .

[7]  T. Hayes,et al.  Lipoprotein research and electron microscopy at Donner Laboratory , 2002 .

[8]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[9]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[10]  C. Lane,et al.  Trust within and between organizations : conceptual issues and empirical applications , 2000 .

[11]  Simon Frith,et al.  Music and Copyright , 1995 .

[12]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[13]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[14]  Fiona Murray,et al.  Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[15]  D. Hicks Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .

[16]  Scott Stern,et al.  Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research , 2006, American Economic Review.

[17]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms , 2012 .

[18]  Isabelle Bouty Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[19]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French Chefs , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[20]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. , 2002, JAMA.

[21]  Alberto Cambrosio,et al.  “Going Monoclonal”: Art, Science, and Magic in the Day-to-Day Use of Hybridoma Technology , 1988 .

[22]  Rna Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .

[23]  Roderick E. White,et al.  Know‐how transfer: the role of social, economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors , 2008 .

[24]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[27]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials , 2000 .

[28]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  More for the research dollar , 2010, Nature.

[29]  Andrew J. Nelson Putting University Research in Context: Assessing Alternative Measures of Production and Diffusion at Stanford , 2011 .

[30]  P. Geroski Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[31]  J. D. Tardós,et al.  Publish or Perish , 1987 .

[32]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research , 2007 .

[33]  Jason Owen-Smith,et al.  From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities , 2003 .

[34]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Christopher Grey,et al.  Bringing Secrecy into the Open: Towards a Theorization of the Social Processes of Organizational Secrecy , 2014 .

[36]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  The Choice between Formal and Informal Intellectual Property: A Review , 2014 .

[37]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex , 1986 .

[38]  Heidi L. Williams Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from the Human Genome , 2010, Journal of Political Economy.

[39]  Oren Bar-Gill,et al.  The Value of Giving Away Secrets , 2003 .

[40]  Salvatore Torrisi,et al.  Markets for technology , 2001 .

[41]  Wei Hong,et al.  For Money or Glory? Commercialization, Competition, and Secrecy in the Entrepreneurial University , 2009 .

[42]  Paul Rabinow,et al.  Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology , 1997 .

[43]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Riccardo Fini,et al.  Different yokes for different folks: Individual preferences, institutional logics, and the commercialization of academic research , 2010 .

[45]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[46]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law , 1991 .

[47]  John Walsh,et al.  Knowledge Accumulation and Industry Evolution: The effects of research tool patents and licensing on biomedical innovation , 2006 .

[48]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[49]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[50]  S S Hughes,et al.  Making Dollars out of DNA: The First Major Patent in Biotechnology and the Commercialization of Molecular Biology, 1974-1980 , 2001, Isis.

[51]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[52]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[53]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[54]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[55]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[56]  Andrew J. Nelson The Sound of Innovation: Stanford and the Computer Music Revolution , 2015 .

[57]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[58]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1975, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

[59]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[60]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[61]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[62]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process , 2012 .

[63]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output , 2009 .

[64]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[65]  Robert Cook-Deegan,et al.  Patents, Secrecy, and DNA , 2001, Science.

[66]  Steven Shapin,et al.  Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science as if It Was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority , 2010 .

[67]  Mike Wright,et al.  Mid-range universities' linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries , 2008 .

[68]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Industry/University Licensing: Characteristics, Concerns and Issues from the Perspective of the Buyer , 2003 .

[69]  Fiona E. Murray The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.

[70]  G. Davis,et al.  Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[71]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[72]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[73]  R. Friedland Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[74]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[75]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science , 2011 .

[76]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[77]  Paula E. Stephan How Economics Shapes Science , 2012 .

[78]  Julien Pénin,et al.  Open Knowledge Disclosure: An Overview of the Evidence and Economic Motivations , 2007 .

[79]  G. Fine,et al.  Secrecy, Trust, and Dangerous Leisure: Generating Group Cohesion in Voluntary Organizations , 1996 .

[80]  Sarah Kaplan,et al.  Strategy and PowerPoint: An Inquiry into the Epistemic Culture and Machinery of Strategy Making , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[81]  Martyna Janowicz-Panjaitan,et al.  Trust, Calculation, and Interorganizational Learning of Tacit Knowledge: An Organizational Roles Perspective , 2009 .

[82]  J J Doll,et al.  The Patenting of DNA , 1998, Science.