Phylogenetic analysis of 73 060 taxa corroborates major eukaryotic groups

Obtaining a well supported schema of phylogenetic relationships among the major groups of living organisms requires considering as much taxonomic diversity as possible, but the computational cost of calculating large phylogenies has so far been a major obstacle. We show here that the parsimony algorithms implemented in TNT can successfully process the largest phylogenetic data set ever analysed, consisting of molecular sequences and morphology for 73 060 eukaryotic taxa. The trees resulting from molecules alone display a high degree of congruence with the major taxonomic groups, with a small proportion of misplaced species; the combined data set retrieves these groups with even higher congruence. This shows that tree‐calculation algorithms effectively retrieve phylogenetic history for very large data sets, and at the same time provides strong corroboration for the major eukaryotic lineages long recognized by taxonomists.

[1]  G. Edgecombe,et al.  The position of crustaceans within Arthropoda - Evidence from nine molecular loci and morphology , 2010 .

[2]  R. Rieger,et al.  Comparative fine structure study of the Gastrotrich cuticle and aspects of cuticle evolution within the Aschelminthes1 , 2009 .

[3]  David C. Tank,et al.  An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: , 2009 .

[4]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches , 2009, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[5]  C. Szumik,et al.  Phylogeny of embiopterans (Insecta) , 2008 .

[6]  Pablo A. Goloboff,et al.  TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis , 2008 .

[7]  J. Gatesy,et al.  Impact of increased character sampling on the phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla (Mammalia): combined analysis including fossils , 2008, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[8]  A. Kieneke,et al.  Novel implications for the basal internal relationships of Gastrotricha revealed by an analysis of morphological characters , 2008 .

[9]  Kazutaka Katoh,et al.  Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program , 2008, Briefings Bioinform..

[10]  David Q. Matus,et al.  Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life , 2008, Nature.

[11]  L. Katz,et al.  BMC Evolutionary Biology BioMed Central Research article Broadly sampled multigene trees of eukaryotes , 2008 .

[12]  G. Rouse,et al.  A modern look at the Animal Tree of Life , 2007 .

[13]  M. Chase,et al.  After a dozen years of progress the origin of angiosperms is still a great mystery , 2007, Nature.

[14]  James Leebens-Mack,et al.  Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Pamela S Soltis,et al.  Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M. Sanderson Construction and annotation of large phylogenetic trees , 2007 .

[17]  Purificación López-García,et al.  Global eukaryote phylogeny: Combined small- and large-subunit ribosomal DNA trees support monophyly of Rhizaria, Retaria and Excavata. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[18]  J. Shultz A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters , 2007 .

[19]  Pablo A Goloboff,et al.  On divide-and-conquer strategies for parsimony analysis of large data sets: Rec-I-DCM3 versus TNT. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[20]  Michael Weiss,et al.  A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. , 2007, Mycological research.

[21]  B. G. Briggs,et al.  Hydatellaceae identified as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree , 2007, Nature.

[22]  G. Rouse,et al.  A molecular phylogeny of annelids , 2007, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[23]  D. Stevenson,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms , 2007, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[24]  Kenji Matsuura,et al.  Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny , 2006, Nature.

[25]  Alexandros Stamatakis,et al.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models , 2006, Bioinform..

[26]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Phylogenetic supermatrix analysis of GenBank sequences from 2228 papilionoid legumes. , 2006, Systematic biology.

[27]  Gonzalo Giribet,et al.  Evidence for a clade composed of molluscs with serially repeated structures: Monoplacophorans are related to chitons , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  R. Beutel,et al.  Endopterygote systematics – where do we stand and what is the goal (Hexapoda, Arthropoda)? , 2006 .

[29]  S. Tyler,et al.  Concordance of molecular and morphological data: The example of the Acoela. , 2006, Integrative and comparative biology.

[30]  M. Dagosto,et al.  Primate Origins and Evolution. A phylogenetic reconstruction , 1991, International Journal of Primatology.

[31]  P. Moler,et al.  THE AMPHIBIAN TREE OF LIFE , 2006 .

[32]  Z. Jiang PHYLOGENY OF OSTEOGLOSSOMORPHA , 2006 .

[33]  Ward C. Wheeler,et al.  Parsimony overcomes statistical inconsistency with the addition of more data from the same gene , 2005, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[34]  S. Adl,et al.  The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists , 2005, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[35]  Niklas Wahlberg,et al.  Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  B. Gardiner,et al.  A review of the lower actinopterygian phylogeny , 2005 .

[37]  A. Collins,et al.  Cladistic analysis of Medusozoa and cnidarian evolution , 2005 .

[38]  W. Wheeler,et al.  On bivalve phylogeny: a high‐level analysis of the Bivalvia (Mollusca) based on combined morphology and DNA sequence data , 2005 .

[39]  J. Bergsten A review of long‐branch attraction , 2005, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[40]  K. Katoh,et al.  MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  M. Benton Phylogeny of the major tetrapod groups: Morphological data and divergence dates , 1990, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[42]  S. Tyler,et al.  Adhesive organs of the gastrotricha , 1980, Zoomorphologie.

[43]  L. Parenti The phylogeny of atherinomorphs: evolution of a novel fish reproductive system , 2005 .

[44]  G. Gilbert,et al.  THE NEW VIEW OF ANIMAL PHYLOGENY , 2005 .

[45]  Bernard M. E. Moret Computational Challenges from the Tree of Life , 2005, ALENEX/ANALCO.

[46]  H. Krenn,et al.  Evolution of proboscis musculature in Lepidoptera , 2004 .

[47]  L. Parenti,et al.  Evolution and Phylogeny of Gonad Morphology in Bony Fishes1 , 2004, Integrative and comparative biology.

[48]  Bryan Kolaczkowski,et al.  Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous , 2004, Nature.

[49]  A. Lindgren,et al.  A combined approach to the phylogeny of Cephalopoda (Mollusca) , 2004, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[50]  Pamela S Soltis,et al.  Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and "ending incongruence": a cautionary tale in phylogenetics. , 2004, Trends in plant science.

[51]  J. Huelsenbeck,et al.  Bayesian Inference of the Metazoan Phylogeny A Combined Molecular and Morphological Approach , 2004, Current Biology.

[52]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[53]  F. D. Dario Homology between the recessus lateralis and cephalic sensory canals, with the proposition of additional synapomorphies for the Clupeiformes and the Clupeoidei , 2004 .

[54]  D. Soltis,et al.  Amborella not a "basal angiosperm"? Not so fast. , 2004, American journal of botany.

[55]  John Gatesy,et al.  Inconsistencies in arguments for the supertree approach: supermatrices versus supertrees of Crocodylia. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[56]  M. Heithaus,et al.  The Origin and Relationships of Early Chondrichthyes , 2004 .

[57]  M. Novacek,et al.  Relationships of Endemic African Mammals and Their Fossil Relatives Based on Morphological and Molecular Evidence , 2003, Journal of Mammalian Evolution.

[58]  A. Wyss,et al.  The Morphology of Tribosphenomys (Rodentiaformes, Mammalia): Phylogenetic Implications for Basal Glires , 2001, Journal of Mammalian Evolution.

[59]  J. Farris,et al.  Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants and flowering plants , 1998, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[60]  W. Luckett,et al.  Phylogenetic Relationships Between the Orders Artiodactyla and Cetacea: A Combined Assessment of Morphological and Molecular Evidence , 1998, Journal of Mammalian Evolution.

[61]  Sven Lange,et al.  Evolucion y filogenia de los crustaceos , 2004 .

[62]  G. Barlow,et al.  Fishes of the world , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[63]  J. Lundberg,et al.  An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants : APG II THE ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP * , 2003 .

[64]  Alexander Isaev,et al.  PyEvolve: a toolkit for statistical modelling of molecular evolution , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[65]  G. Mayr,et al.  The deep divergences of neornithine birds: a phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters , 2003, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[66]  C. Neinhuis,et al.  Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. , 2003, American journal of botany.

[67]  Rytas Vilgalys,et al.  Taxonomic misidentification in public DNA databases. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[68]  C. Nielsen Proposing a solution to the Articulata–Ecdysozoa controversy , 2003 .

[69]  V. Goremykin,et al.  Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that amborella is not a basal angiosperm. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[70]  M. Sánchez-Villagra,et al.  A morphological analysis of marsupial mammal higher-level phylogenetic relationships , 2003 .

[71]  Pablo A. Goloboff,et al.  Parsimony, likelihood, and simplicity , 2003 .

[72]  G. Dyke,et al.  Suprageneric relationships of galliform birds (Aves, Galliformes): a cladistic analysis of morphological characters , 2003 .

[73]  Wei‐Jen Chen,et al.  Repeatability of clades as a criterion of reliability: a case study for molecular phylogeny of Acanthomorpha (Teleostei) with larger number of taxa. , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[74]  S. Tyler Epithelium—The Primary Building Block for Metazoan Complexity1 , 2003, Integrative and comparative biology.

[75]  J. Zrzavý Gastrotricha and metazoan phylogeny , 2003 .

[76]  Apgii An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants : APGII , 2003 .

[77]  J. C. Tyler,et al.  Phylogeny of the Genera and Families of Zeiform Fishes, with Comments on their Relationships with Tetraodontiforms and Caproids , 2003 .

[78]  Hiromitsu Endo Phylogeny of the Order Gadiformes (Teleostei, Paracanthopterygii) , 2002 .

[79]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The (Super)Tree of Life: Procedures, Problems, and Prospects , 2002 .

[80]  W. Wheeler,et al.  Simultaneous analysis of the basal lineages of Hymenoptera (Insecta) using sensitivity analysis , 2002, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[81]  Diego Pol,et al.  Semi‐strict supertrees , 2002, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[82]  Brian D. Farrell,et al.  Molecular and morphological phylogenetics of weevils (coleoptera, curculionoidea): do niche shifts accompany diversification? , 2002, Systematic biology.

[83]  R. Kristensen An Introduction to Loricifera, Cycliophora, and Micrognathozoa1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[84]  M. Gayet,et al.  Diversification in Polypteriformes and Special Comparison With the Lepisosteiformes , 2002 .

[85]  T. Cavalier-smith The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa. , 2002, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[86]  Terry Gaasterland,et al.  The analysis of 100 genes supports the grouping of three highly divergent amoebae: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[87]  E. Hilton A contribution to the comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony -tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha) , 2002 .

[88]  J. Geisler New Morphological Evidence for the Phylogeny of Artiodactyla, Cetacea, and Mesonychidae , 2001 .

[89]  James M. Carpenter,et al.  The Phylogeny of the Extant Hexapod Orders , 2001, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[90]  V. Hypša,et al.  Myzostomida Are Not Annelids: Molecular and Morphological Support for a Clade of Animals with Anterior Sperm Flagella , 2001, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[91]  L. Vilhelmsen Phylogeny and classification of the extant basal lineages of the Hymenoptera (Insecta) , 2001 .

[92]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals , 2001, Nature.

[93]  D. Brooks,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of the Rhabdocoela (Platyhelminthes) with emphasis on the Neodermata and relatives , 2001 .

[94]  E. Ross EMBIA. Contributions to the biosystematics of the insect order Embiidina. Part 3. The Embiidae of the Americas (Order Embiidina) , 2001 .

[95]  W. Doolittle,et al.  A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. , 2000, Science.

[96]  W. Kress,et al.  Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences , 2000 .

[97]  G. Edgecombe,et al.  Arthropod Cladistics: Combined Analysis of Histone H3 and U2 snRNA Sequences and Morphology , 2000 .

[98]  D Penny,et al.  Parsimony, likelihood, and the role of models in molecular phylogenetics. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[99]  P. Forey,et al.  Conodont affinity and chordate phylogeny , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[100]  M. Litvaitis,et al.  Phylogeny of Gastrotricha: a morphology-based framework of gastrotrich relationships. , 2000, The Biological bulletin.

[101]  F. Haas,et al.  Phylogenetic Relationships of the Suborders of Coleoptera (Insecta) , 2000 .

[102]  H. Krenn,et al.  Early evolution of the proboscis of Lepidoptera (Insecta): external morphology of the galea in basal glossatan moths lineages, with remarks on the origin of the pilifers. , 2000 .

[103]  P. Goloboff Analyzing Large Data Sets in Reasonable Times: Solutions for Composite Optima , 1999, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[104]  D. Patterson,et al.  The Diversity of Eukaryotes , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[105]  E. Herniou,et al.  Acoel flatworms: earliest extant bilaterian Metazoans, not members of Platyhelminthes. , 1999, Science.

[106]  F. Ronquist,et al.  Phylogeny of the Hymenoptera: A cladistic reanalysis of Rasnitsyn’s (1988) data , 1999 .

[107]  D. Yeates,et al.  Congruence and controversy: toward a higher-level phylogeny of Diptera. , 1999, Annual review of entomology.

[108]  J. Farris,et al.  Support, Ribosomal Sequences and the Phylogeny Of The Eukaryotes , 1998, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[109]  J. Doyle PHYLOGENY OF VASCULAR PLANTS , 1998 .

[110]  A. Bezděk,et al.  Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence , 1998, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[111]  W. Wheeler,et al.  The Phylogeny of the Extant Chelicerate Orders , 1998 .

[112]  R. Andersen,et al.  A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY OF THE HETEROKONT ALGAE BASED ON ANALYSES OF CHLOROPLAST‐ENCODED rbcL SEQUENCE DATA 1 , 1997 .

[113]  M. Stiassny,et al.  Interrelationships of fishes , 1997 .

[114]  D. Littlewood,et al.  The interrelationships of the echinoderm classes: morphological and molecular evidence , 1997 .

[115]  G. Rouse,et al.  Cladistics and polychaetes , 1997 .

[116]  W C Wheeler,et al.  The Strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. , 1997, Systematic biology.

[117]  W. Ponder,et al.  Towards a phylogeny of gastropod molluscs: an analysis using morphological characters , 1997 .

[118]  L. Vilhelmsen The preoral cavity of lower Hymenoptera (Insecta): comparative morphology and phylogenetic significance , 1996 .

[119]  M. C. D. Pinna,et al.  Chapter 7 – Teleostean Monophyly , 1996 .

[120]  S. Fink Chapter 11 – Interrelationships of Ostariophysan Fishes (Teleostei) , 1996 .

[121]  G. Lecointre Chapter 10 – Clupeomorpha, Sister-Group of Ostariophysi , 1996 .

[122]  M. Stiassny Chapter 15 – Basal Ctenosquamate Relationships and the Interrelationships of the Myctophiform (Scopelomorph) Fishes , 1996 .

[123]  P. Forey,et al.  Chapter 9 – Interrelationships of Elopomorph Fishes , 1996 .

[124]  L. Guo-qing Chapter 8 – Phylogeny of Osteoglossomorpha , 1996 .

[125]  G. D. Johnson,et al.  Chapter 12 – Relationships of Lower Euteleostean Fishes , 1996 .

[126]  C. Baldwin,et al.  Interrelationships of Aulopiformes , 1996 .

[127]  F. Schram Animal evolution: Interrelationships of living Phyla , 1995 .

[128]  Kevin C. Nixon,et al.  A Reevaluation of Seed Plant Phylogeny , 1994 .

[129]  T. Backeljau,et al.  CLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF METAZOAN RELATIONSHIPS: A REAPPRAISAL. , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[130]  W. Wheeler,et al.  ARTHROPOD PHYLOGENY: A COMBINED APPROACH , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[131]  D. Cannatella,et al.  THE MAJOR CLADES OF FROGS , 1993 .

[132]  J. Olney,et al.  Phylogeny of lampridiform fishes , 1993 .

[133]  W. W. Dimmick,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE SALAMANDER FAMILIES: AN ANALYSIS OF CONGRUENCE AMONG MORPHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERS , 1993 .

[134]  James F. Smith Phylogenetics of seed plants : An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL , 1993 .

[135]  D. P. Begle Monophyly and Relationships of the Argentinoid Fishes , 1992 .

[136]  D. Stevenson,et al.  CLADISTICS OF THE MAGNOLIIDAE , 1991, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[137]  David M. Williams PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG THE CHROMISTA: A REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS , 1991, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[138]  B. Gardiner,et al.  Interrelationships of lower actinopterygian fishes , 1989 .

[139]  E. N. Arnold A cladisticization: phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families. , 1989, Science.

[140]  R. Nussbaum,et al.  On the Classification and Phylogeny of Caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona), a Critical Review , 1989 .

[141]  A. Tehler,et al.  A Cladistic Outline of the Eumycota , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[142]  K. Queiroz**,et al.  A phylogenetic analysis of lepidosauromorpha , 1988 .

[143]  J. Cloudsley-Thompson Palaeontology and Phylogeny , 1988 .

[144]  C. Humphries,et al.  ON CLADISTIC RELATIONSHIPS IN GREEN PLANTS , 1987 .

[145]  P. Goloboff,et al.  On the Monophyly of the Spider Suborder Mesothelae (Arachnida: Araneae) , 1985 .

[146]  L. Grande Recent and fossil clupeomorph fishes with materials for revision of the subgroups of clupeoids. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 181, article 2 , 1985 .

[147]  R. Raikow Monophyly of the Passeriformes: Test of a Phylogenetic Hypothesis , 1982 .

[148]  W. Fink,et al.  Interrelationships of the ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei) , 1981 .

[149]  N. P. Kristensen Phylogeny of Insect Orders , 1981 .

[150]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Eukaryote kingdoms: seven or nine? , 1981, Bio Systems.

[151]  J. Felsenstein Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .

[152]  D. Rosen,et al.  Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes, and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 158, article 2 , 1977 .

[153]  N. Platnick The hypochiloid spiders : a cladistic analysis, with notes on the Atypoidea (Arachnida, Araneae). American Museum novitates ; no. 2627 , 1977 .

[154]  Stanley H. Weitzman,et al.  Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 131, article 4 , 1967 .

[155]  L. Pauling,et al.  Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins , 1965 .

[156]  E. J. Miers Crustacea , 1879, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[157]  H. Ruckes STUDIES IN CHELONIAN OSTEOLOGY, Part II: THE MORPHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE GIRDLES, RIBS AND CARAPACE , 1929 .

[158]  Archosaur phylogeny and the relationships of the Crocodyli a , 2022 .