Phylogenetic analysis of 73 060 taxa corroborates major eukaryotic groups
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Farris | M. Källersjö | P. Goloboff | S. Catalano | Pablo A. Goloboff | Santiago A. Catalano | C. Szumik | James S. Farris | Mari Källersjö | J. Marcos Mirande | J. Salvador Arias | J. Marcos Mirande | Claudia A. Szumik | J. Salvador Arias
[1] G. Edgecombe,et al. The position of crustaceans within Arthropoda - Evidence from nine molecular loci and morphology , 2010 .
[2] R. Rieger,et al. Comparative fine structure study of the Gastrotrich cuticle and aspects of cuticle evolution within the Aschelminthes1 , 2009 .
[3] David C. Tank,et al. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: , 2009 .
[4] M. Donoghue,et al. Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches , 2009, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[5] C. Szumik,et al. Phylogeny of embiopterans (Insecta) , 2008 .
[6] Pablo A. Goloboff,et al. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis , 2008 .
[7] J. Gatesy,et al. Impact of increased character sampling on the phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla (Mammalia): combined analysis including fossils , 2008, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[8] A. Kieneke,et al. Novel implications for the basal internal relationships of Gastrotricha revealed by an analysis of morphological characters , 2008 .
[9] Kazutaka Katoh,et al. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program , 2008, Briefings Bioinform..
[10] David Q. Matus,et al. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life , 2008, Nature.
[11] L. Katz,et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology BioMed Central Research article Broadly sampled multigene trees of eukaryotes , 2008 .
[12] G. Rouse,et al. A modern look at the Animal Tree of Life , 2007 .
[13] M. Chase,et al. After a dozen years of progress the origin of angiosperms is still a great mystery , 2007, Nature.
[14] James Leebens-Mack,et al. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[15] Pamela S Soltis,et al. Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[16] M. Sanderson. Construction and annotation of large phylogenetic trees , 2007 .
[17] Purificación López-García,et al. Global eukaryote phylogeny: Combined small- and large-subunit ribosomal DNA trees support monophyly of Rhizaria, Retaria and Excavata. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[18] J. Shultz. A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters , 2007 .
[19] Pablo A Goloboff,et al. On divide-and-conquer strategies for parsimony analysis of large data sets: Rec-I-DCM3 versus TNT. , 2007, Systematic biology.
[20] Michael Weiss,et al. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. , 2007, Mycological research.
[21] B. G. Briggs,et al. Hydatellaceae identified as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree , 2007, Nature.
[22] G. Rouse,et al. A molecular phylogeny of annelids , 2007, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[23] D. Stevenson,et al. A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms , 2007, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[24] Kenji Matsuura,et al. Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny , 2006, Nature.
[25] Alexandros Stamatakis,et al. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models , 2006, Bioinform..
[26] M. Sanderson,et al. Phylogenetic supermatrix analysis of GenBank sequences from 2228 papilionoid legumes. , 2006, Systematic biology.
[27] Gonzalo Giribet,et al. Evidence for a clade composed of molluscs with serially repeated structures: Monoplacophorans are related to chitons , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[28] R. Beutel,et al. Endopterygote systematics – where do we stand and what is the goal (Hexapoda, Arthropoda)? , 2006 .
[29] S. Tyler,et al. Concordance of molecular and morphological data: The example of the Acoela. , 2006, Integrative and comparative biology.
[30] M. Dagosto,et al. Primate Origins and Evolution. A phylogenetic reconstruction , 1991, International Journal of Primatology.
[31] P. Moler,et al. THE AMPHIBIAN TREE OF LIFE , 2006 .
[32] Z. Jiang. PHYLOGENY OF OSTEOGLOSSOMORPHA , 2006 .
[33] Ward C. Wheeler,et al. Parsimony overcomes statistical inconsistency with the addition of more data from the same gene , 2005, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[34] S. Adl,et al. The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists , 2005, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.
[35] Niklas Wahlberg,et al. Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[36] B. Gardiner,et al. A review of the lower actinopterygian phylogeny , 2005 .
[37] A. Collins,et al. Cladistic analysis of Medusozoa and cnidarian evolution , 2005 .
[38] W. Wheeler,et al. On bivalve phylogeny: a high‐level analysis of the Bivalvia (Mollusca) based on combined morphology and DNA sequence data , 2005 .
[39] J. Bergsten. A review of long‐branch attraction , 2005, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[40] K. Katoh,et al. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment , 2005, Nucleic acids research.
[41] M. Benton. Phylogeny of the major tetrapod groups: Morphological data and divergence dates , 1990, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[42] S. Tyler,et al. Adhesive organs of the gastrotricha , 1980, Zoomorphologie.
[43] L. Parenti. The phylogeny of atherinomorphs: evolution of a novel fish reproductive system , 2005 .
[44] G. Gilbert,et al. THE NEW VIEW OF ANIMAL PHYLOGENY , 2005 .
[45] Bernard M. E. Moret. Computational Challenges from the Tree of Life , 2005, ALENEX/ANALCO.
[46] H. Krenn,et al. Evolution of proboscis musculature in Lepidoptera , 2004 .
[47] L. Parenti,et al. Evolution and Phylogeny of Gonad Morphology in Bony Fishes1 , 2004, Integrative and comparative biology.
[48] Bryan Kolaczkowski,et al. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous , 2004, Nature.
[49] A. Lindgren,et al. A combined approach to the phylogeny of Cephalopoda (Mollusca) , 2004, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[50] Pamela S Soltis,et al. Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and "ending incongruence": a cautionary tale in phylogenetics. , 2004, Trends in plant science.
[51] J. Huelsenbeck,et al. Bayesian Inference of the Metazoan Phylogeny A Combined Molecular and Morphological Approach , 2004, Current Biology.
[52] Robert C. Edgar,et al. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.
[53] F. D. Dario. Homology between the recessus lateralis and cephalic sensory canals, with the proposition of additional synapomorphies for the Clupeiformes and the Clupeoidei , 2004 .
[54] D. Soltis,et al. Amborella not a "basal angiosperm"? Not so fast. , 2004, American journal of botany.
[55] John Gatesy,et al. Inconsistencies in arguments for the supertree approach: supermatrices versus supertrees of Crocodylia. , 2004, Systematic biology.
[56] M. Heithaus,et al. The Origin and Relationships of Early Chondrichthyes , 2004 .
[57] M. Novacek,et al. Relationships of Endemic African Mammals and Their Fossil Relatives Based on Morphological and Molecular Evidence , 2003, Journal of Mammalian Evolution.
[58] A. Wyss,et al. The Morphology of Tribosphenomys (Rodentiaformes, Mammalia): Phylogenetic Implications for Basal Glires , 2001, Journal of Mammalian Evolution.
[59] J. Farris,et al. Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants and flowering plants , 1998, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[60] W. Luckett,et al. Phylogenetic Relationships Between the Orders Artiodactyla and Cetacea: A Combined Assessment of Morphological and Molecular Evidence , 1998, Journal of Mammalian Evolution.
[61] Sven Lange,et al. Evolucion y filogenia de los crustaceos , 2004 .
[62] G. Barlow,et al. Fishes of the world , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.
[63] J. Lundberg,et al. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants : APG II THE ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP * , 2003 .
[64] Alexander Isaev,et al. PyEvolve: a toolkit for statistical modelling of molecular evolution , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.
[65] G. Mayr,et al. The deep divergences of neornithine birds: a phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters , 2003, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[66] C. Neinhuis,et al. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. , 2003, American journal of botany.
[67] Rytas Vilgalys,et al. Taxonomic misidentification in public DNA databases. , 2003, The New phytologist.
[68] C. Nielsen. Proposing a solution to the Articulata–Ecdysozoa controversy , 2003 .
[69] V. Goremykin,et al. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that amborella is not a basal angiosperm. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.
[70] M. Sánchez-Villagra,et al. A morphological analysis of marsupial mammal higher-level phylogenetic relationships , 2003 .
[71] Pablo A. Goloboff,et al. Parsimony, likelihood, and simplicity , 2003 .
[72] G. Dyke,et al. Suprageneric relationships of galliform birds (Aves, Galliformes): a cladistic analysis of morphological characters , 2003 .
[73] Wei‐Jen Chen,et al. Repeatability of clades as a criterion of reliability: a case study for molecular phylogeny of Acanthomorpha (Teleostei) with larger number of taxa. , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[74] S. Tyler. Epithelium—The Primary Building Block for Metazoan Complexity1 , 2003, Integrative and comparative biology.
[75] J. Zrzavý. Gastrotricha and metazoan phylogeny , 2003 .
[76] Apgii. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants : APGII , 2003 .
[77] J. C. Tyler,et al. Phylogeny of the Genera and Families of Zeiform Fishes, with Comments on their Relationships with Tetraodontiforms and Caproids , 2003 .
[78] Hiromitsu Endo. Phylogeny of the Order Gadiformes (Teleostei, Paracanthopterygii) , 2002 .
[79] J. L. Gittleman,et al. The (Super)Tree of Life: Procedures, Problems, and Prospects , 2002 .
[80] W. Wheeler,et al. Simultaneous analysis of the basal lineages of Hymenoptera (Insecta) using sensitivity analysis , 2002, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[81] Diego Pol,et al. Semi‐strict supertrees , 2002, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[82] Brian D. Farrell,et al. Molecular and morphological phylogenetics of weevils (coleoptera, curculionoidea): do niche shifts accompany diversification? , 2002, Systematic biology.
[83] R. Kristensen. An Introduction to Loricifera, Cycliophora, and Micrognathozoa1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.
[84] M. Gayet,et al. Diversification in Polypteriformes and Special Comparison With the Lepisosteiformes , 2002 .
[85] T. Cavalier-smith. The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa. , 2002, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.
[86] Terry Gaasterland,et al. The analysis of 100 genes supports the grouping of three highly divergent amoebae: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[87] E. Hilton. A contribution to the comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony -tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha) , 2002 .
[88] J. Geisler. New Morphological Evidence for the Phylogeny of Artiodactyla, Cetacea, and Mesonychidae , 2001 .
[89] James M. Carpenter,et al. The Phylogeny of the Extant Hexapod Orders , 2001, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[90] V. Hypša,et al. Myzostomida Are Not Annelids: Molecular and Morphological Support for a Clade of Animals with Anterior Sperm Flagella , 2001, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[91] L. Vilhelmsen. Phylogeny and classification of the extant basal lineages of the Hymenoptera (Insecta) , 2001 .
[92] S. O’Brien,et al. Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals , 2001, Nature.
[93] D. Brooks,et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the Rhabdocoela (Platyhelminthes) with emphasis on the Neodermata and relatives , 2001 .
[94] E. Ross. EMBIA. Contributions to the biosystematics of the insect order Embiidina. Part 3. The Embiidae of the Americas (Order Embiidina) , 2001 .
[95] W. Doolittle,et al. A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. , 2000, Science.
[96] W. Kress,et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences , 2000 .
[97] G. Edgecombe,et al. Arthropod Cladistics: Combined Analysis of Histone H3 and U2 snRNA Sequences and Morphology , 2000 .
[98] D Penny,et al. Parsimony, likelihood, and the role of models in molecular phylogenetics. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.
[99] P. Forey,et al. Conodont affinity and chordate phylogeny , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[100] M. Litvaitis,et al. Phylogeny of Gastrotricha: a morphology-based framework of gastrotrich relationships. , 2000, The Biological bulletin.
[101] F. Haas,et al. Phylogenetic Relationships of the Suborders of Coleoptera (Insecta) , 2000 .
[102] H. Krenn,et al. Early evolution of the proboscis of Lepidoptera (Insecta): external morphology of the galea in basal glossatan moths lineages, with remarks on the origin of the pilifers. , 2000 .
[103] P. Goloboff. Analyzing Large Data Sets in Reasonable Times: Solutions for Composite Optima , 1999, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[104] D. Patterson,et al. The Diversity of Eukaryotes , 1999, The American Naturalist.
[105] E. Herniou,et al. Acoel flatworms: earliest extant bilaterian Metazoans, not members of Platyhelminthes. , 1999, Science.
[106] F. Ronquist,et al. Phylogeny of the Hymenoptera: A cladistic reanalysis of Rasnitsyn’s (1988) data , 1999 .
[107] D. Yeates,et al. Congruence and controversy: toward a higher-level phylogeny of Diptera. , 1999, Annual review of entomology.
[108] J. Farris,et al. Support, Ribosomal Sequences and the Phylogeny Of The Eukaryotes , 1998, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[109] J. Doyle. PHYLOGENY OF VASCULAR PLANTS , 1998 .
[110] A. Bezděk,et al. Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence , 1998, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[111] W. Wheeler,et al. The Phylogeny of the Extant Chelicerate Orders , 1998 .
[112] R. Andersen,et al. A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY OF THE HETEROKONT ALGAE BASED ON ANALYSES OF CHLOROPLAST‐ENCODED rbcL SEQUENCE DATA 1 , 1997 .
[113] M. Stiassny,et al. Interrelationships of fishes , 1997 .
[114] D. Littlewood,et al. The interrelationships of the echinoderm classes: morphological and molecular evidence , 1997 .
[115] G. Rouse,et al. Cladistics and polychaetes , 1997 .
[116] W C Wheeler,et al. The Strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. , 1997, Systematic biology.
[117] W. Ponder,et al. Towards a phylogeny of gastropod molluscs: an analysis using morphological characters , 1997 .
[118] L. Vilhelmsen. The preoral cavity of lower Hymenoptera (Insecta): comparative morphology and phylogenetic significance , 1996 .
[119] M. C. D. Pinna,et al. Chapter 7 – Teleostean Monophyly , 1996 .
[120] S. Fink. Chapter 11 – Interrelationships of Ostariophysan Fishes (Teleostei) , 1996 .
[121] G. Lecointre. Chapter 10 – Clupeomorpha, Sister-Group of Ostariophysi , 1996 .
[122] M. Stiassny. Chapter 15 – Basal Ctenosquamate Relationships and the Interrelationships of the Myctophiform (Scopelomorph) Fishes , 1996 .
[123] P. Forey,et al. Chapter 9 – Interrelationships of Elopomorph Fishes , 1996 .
[124] L. Guo-qing. Chapter 8 – Phylogeny of Osteoglossomorpha , 1996 .
[125] G. D. Johnson,et al. Chapter 12 – Relationships of Lower Euteleostean Fishes , 1996 .
[126] C. Baldwin,et al. Interrelationships of Aulopiformes , 1996 .
[127] F. Schram. Animal evolution: Interrelationships of living Phyla , 1995 .
[128] Kevin C. Nixon,et al. A Reevaluation of Seed Plant Phylogeny , 1994 .
[129] T. Backeljau,et al. CLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF METAZOAN RELATIONSHIPS: A REAPPRAISAL. , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[130] W. Wheeler,et al. ARTHROPOD PHYLOGENY: A COMBINED APPROACH , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[131] D. Cannatella,et al. THE MAJOR CLADES OF FROGS , 1993 .
[132] J. Olney,et al. Phylogeny of lampridiform fishes , 1993 .
[133] W. W. Dimmick,et al. PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE SALAMANDER FAMILIES: AN ANALYSIS OF CONGRUENCE AMONG MORPHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERS , 1993 .
[134] James F. Smith. Phylogenetics of seed plants : An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL , 1993 .
[135] D. P. Begle. Monophyly and Relationships of the Argentinoid Fishes , 1992 .
[136] D. Stevenson,et al. CLADISTICS OF THE MAGNOLIIDAE , 1991, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[137] David M. Williams. PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG THE CHROMISTA: A REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS , 1991, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[138] B. Gardiner,et al. Interrelationships of lower actinopterygian fishes , 1989 .
[139] E. N. Arnold. A cladisticization: phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families. , 1989, Science.
[140] R. Nussbaum,et al. On the Classification and Phylogeny of Caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona), a Critical Review , 1989 .
[141] A. Tehler,et al. A Cladistic Outline of the Eumycota , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[142] K. Queiroz**,et al. A phylogenetic analysis of lepidosauromorpha , 1988 .
[143] J. Cloudsley-Thompson. Palaeontology and Phylogeny , 1988 .
[144] C. Humphries,et al. ON CLADISTIC RELATIONSHIPS IN GREEN PLANTS , 1987 .
[145] P. Goloboff,et al. On the Monophyly of the Spider Suborder Mesothelae (Arachnida: Araneae) , 1985 .
[146] L. Grande. Recent and fossil clupeomorph fishes with materials for revision of the subgroups of clupeoids. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 181, article 2 , 1985 .
[147] R. Raikow. Monophyly of the Passeriformes: Test of a Phylogenetic Hypothesis , 1982 .
[148] W. Fink,et al. Interrelationships of the ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei) , 1981 .
[149] N. P. Kristensen. Phylogeny of Insect Orders , 1981 .
[150] T. Cavalier-smith,et al. Eukaryote kingdoms: seven or nine? , 1981, Bio Systems.
[151] J. Felsenstein. Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .
[152] D. Rosen,et al. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes, and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 158, article 2 , 1977 .
[153] N. Platnick. The hypochiloid spiders : a cladistic analysis, with notes on the Atypoidea (Arachnida, Araneae). American Museum novitates ; no. 2627 , 1977 .
[154] Stanley H. Weitzman,et al. Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 131, article 4 , 1967 .
[155] L. Pauling,et al. Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins , 1965 .
[156] E. J. Miers. Crustacea , 1879, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.
[157] H. Ruckes. STUDIES IN CHELONIAN OSTEOLOGY, Part II: THE MORPHOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE GIRDLES, RIBS AND CARAPACE , 1929 .
[158] Archosaur phylogeny and the relationships of the Crocodyli a , 2022 .