The acquisition process as a learning process: Evidence from a study of critical problems and solutions in domestic and cross-border deals

While mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are clearly on the rise, most deals do not create value. Researchers have attempted to explain poor performance by a failure to adequately manage the acquisition process. Following this research, this study first attempted to identify key problems faced and solutions employed by acquirers during the stages of the acquisition process for domestic and cross-border deals. Results were then interpreted from a learning perspective, which itself revealed that the acquisition process can be understood both as a learning process applied to the focal deal and as a learning process aimed at improving the acquisition process itself. Moreover, results indicate that both forms of learning are affected by an acquirer's experience in a particular target country.

[1]  David M. Schweiger,et al.  Integrating mergers and acquisitions: An international research review , 2000 .

[2]  Annette Risberg,et al.  Cultural Awareness and National versus Corporate Barriers to Acculturation , 1998 .

[3]  Nalin Kulatilaka,et al.  Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World , 1998 .

[4]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Organizational marriage: “hard” versus“soft” issues? , 1995 .

[5]  D. Gerwin,et al.  Do's and Dont's of Computerized Manufacturing , 1982 .

[6]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[7]  H. Barkema,et al.  FOREIGN ENTRY, CULTURAL BARRIERS, AND LEARNING , 1996 .

[8]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  The Influence of Organizational Acquisition Experience on Acquisition Performance: A Behavioral Learning Perspective , 1999 .

[9]  A. Michel,et al.  The Winner's Curse in the Merger Game , 1987 .

[10]  G. Thomson.  Aerospace Report Number 9 , 1999 .

[11]  H. Barkema,et al.  International Expansion Through Start-Up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[12]  P. Rosenzweig.  Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal , 1991 .

[13]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[14]  Kenneth M. Eades,et al.  Best Practices in Estimating the Cost of Capital: Survey and Synthesis , 1998 .

[15]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  A Cross-National Assessment of Acculturative Stress in Recent European Mergers , 1996 .

[16]  R. Larsson.  Organizational integration of mergers and acquisitions : a case survey of realization of synergy potentials , 1989 .

[17]  S. Sitkin.  Learning Through Failure : The Strategy of Small Losses , 1992 .

[18]  A. Buono.  The human side of mergers and acquisitions , 1989 .

[19]  Ben L. Kedia,et al.  Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology Across Nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management , 1988 .

[20]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Corporate Acquisitions: A Process Perspective , 1986 .

[21]  J. Hennart,et al.  Greenfield vs. Acquisition: The Strategy of Japanese Investors in the United States , 1993 .

[22]  Jiatao Li.  Foreign entry and survival: effects of strategic choices on performance in international markets , 1995 .

[23]  Anne-Marie Søderberg,et al.  Cultural Dimensions of International Mergers and Acquisitions , 1998 .

[24]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[25]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Psst…The merger mavens still have it wrong! , 1996 .