Turbidity observations in sediment flux studies: Examples from Russian rivers in cold environments

Turbidity is commonly used as a proxy to estimate suspended sediment content in streams, and for hydroecological purposes. The scope of this paper is to give an outlook to wider applications of nephelometric turbidimetry as a method. Uncalibrated turbidity records in conjunction with water chemistry data prove useful in detecting watershed reaction to single hydrological events during the spring flood in Arctic Russia. The turbidimetric survey technique was applied to study the spatial variability of sediment yield features on small rivers of the south-eastern part of Sakhalin Island. Suspended sediment concentration (SSC) vs. turbidity relation follows the geological features of the terrain and reflects the land-use intensity within the watersheds. For our Igarka key site, a logarithmic regression model was developed as an instrument of SSC calculation with turbidity data for each of the four studied watersheds. A regional regression model was developed for this site, and supplementary water optics data (filtered sample turbidity) was employed to increase the reliability of SSC calculations. Our results show that factors influencing turbidity, namely water colour and sediment grain size, have to be considered in multivariate models, to minimize errors and acquire an understanding of what kind of physical response is actually measured by nephelometry-based instruments.

[1]  Brian J. Moorman,et al.  Geocryological processes linked to High Arctic proglacial stream suspended sediment dynamics: examples from Bylot Island, Nunavut, and Spitsbergen, Svalbard , 2005 .

[2]  P. Gagnon,et al.  Budget and sources of suspended sediment transported in the St. Lawrence River, Canada , 2000 .

[3]  Ted Lewis,et al.  Hydrochemical and sedimentary responses of paired High Arctic watersheds to unusual climate and permafrost disturbance, Cape Bounty, Melville Island, Canada , 2012 .

[4]  G Chebbo,et al.  Potential of turbidity monitoring for real time control of pollutant discharge in sewers during rainfall events. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  J. Sharp,et al.  Optical Properties, Suspended Sediments, and Chemistry Associated with the Turbidity Maxima of the Delaware Estuary , 1983 .

[6]  James W. O'Dell,et al.  METHOD 180.1 – DETERMINATION OF TURBIDITY BY NEPHELOMETRY , 1996 .

[7]  D. Lawler,et al.  Discharge and suspended sediment dynamics during two jökulhlaups in the Skaftá river, Iceland , 2005 .

[8]  W. Dodds,et al.  Quality and Quantity of Suspended Particles in Rivers: Continent-Scale Patterns in the United States , 2004, Environmental management.

[9]  D. Walling Assessing the accuracy of suspended sediment rating curves for a small basin , 1977 .

[10]  P. Wood,et al.  Controls of variation in suspended sediment concentration in the River Rother, West Sussex, England , 1977 .

[11]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[12]  G. Petts,et al.  Turbidity dynamics during spring storm events in an urban headwater river system: the Upper Tame, West Midlands, UK. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Derek B. Booth,et al.  USING TURBIDITY TO DETERMINE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS IN URBANIZING STREAMS IN THE PUGET LOWLANDS , 1999 .

[14]  James P. McNamara,et al.  An approach to understanding hydrologic connectivity on the hillslope and the implications for nutrient transport , 2003 .

[15]  Turbidity and total suspended solid concentration dynamics in streamflow from California oak woodland watersheds , 2002 .

[16]  J. García‐Ruiz,et al.  Streamflow response and sediment yield after farmland abandonment : results from a small experimental catchment in the Central Spanish Pyrinees , 2010 .

[17]  John R. West,et al.  Use of continuous turbidity sensor in the prediction of fine sediment transport in the turbidity maximum of the Trent Estuary, UK , 2002 .

[18]  J. Harvey,et al.  Characterization of suspended particles in Everglades wetlands , 2007 .

[19]  Christopher J. Gippel,et al.  Potential of turbidity monitoring for measuring the transport of suspended solids in streams , 1995 .

[20]  Charles G. Crawford,et al.  Estimation of Suspended‐Sediment Concentration From Total Suspended Solids and Turbidity Data for Kentucky, 1978‐1995 1 , 2011 .

[21]  J. Lewis,et al.  Turbidity-Controlled Suspended Sediment Sampling for Runoff-Event Load Estimation , 1996 .

[22]  N. Diodato Modelling net erosion responses to enviroclimatic changes recorded upon multisecular timescales , 2006 .

[23]  Susan Bolton,et al.  EFFECTS OF TURBIDITY AND SUSPENDED SOLIDS ON SALMONIDS , 2001 .

[24]  Nick J. Mount,et al.  A discrete Bayesian network to investigate suspended sediment concentrations in an Alpine proglacial zone , 2008 .

[25]  B. Csányi,et al.  Approaches for sediment associated pollutant monitoring in the River Danube , 1994 .

[26]  Ted Lewis,et al.  Hydrological and sediment yield response to summer rainfall in a small high Arctic watershed , 2009 .

[27]  Omid Mohseni,et al.  Improving suspended sediment measurements by automatic samplers. , 2011, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[28]  J. Truhlar Determining suspended sediment loads from turbidity records / La détermination des charges en suspension des rapports sur la turbidité , 1978 .

[29]  J. Hassett,et al.  Turbidity and suspended solids levels and loads in a sediment enriched stream: implications for impacted lotic and lentic ecosystems , 2007 .

[30]  G. Williams Sediment concentration versus water discharge during single hydrologic events in rivers , 1989 .

[31]  D. Knighton Fluvial forms and processes , 1984 .