End-effector design optimisation and multi-robot motion planning for handling compliant parts

The deformation of compliant parts during material handling is a critical issue that can significantly affect the productivity and the parts’ dimensional quality. There are multiple relevant aspects to consider when designing end-effectors to handle compliant parts, e.g. motion planning, holding force, part deformations, collisions, etc. This paper focuses on multi-robot material handling systems where the end-effector designs influence the coordination of the robots to prevent that these collide in the shared workspace. A multi-disciplinary methodology for end-effector design optimisation and multi-robot motion planning for material handling of compliant parts is proposed. The novelty is the co-adaptive optimisation of the end-effectors’ structure with the robot motion planning to obtain the highest productivity and to avoid excessive part deformations. Based on FEA, the dynamic deformations of the parts are modelled in order to consider these during the collision avoidance between the handled parts and obstacles. The proposed methodology is evaluated for a case study that considers the multi-robot material handling of sheet metal parts in a multi-stage tandem press line. The results show that a substantial improvement in productivity can be achieved (up to 1.9%). These also demonstrate the need and contribution of the proposed methodology.

[1]  Bengt Lennartson,et al.  Simulation-based time and jerk optimisation for robotic press tending , 2015 .

[2]  P. Jiménez,et al.  Survey on model-based manipulation planning of deformable objects , 2012 .

[3]  da Silva,et al.  Mechatronics design process with energy optimization for industrial machines , 2015 .

[4]  Alf Samuelsson,et al.  Finite Element Method: Basics , 1998 .

[5]  Darek Ceglarek,et al.  A Dexterous Part-Holding Model for Handling Compliant Sheet Metal Parts , 2002 .

[6]  Giacomo Mantriota,et al.  Theoretical and experimental study of the performance of flat suction cups in the presence of tangential loads , 2011 .

[7]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions , 2010 .

[8]  Bishakh Bhattacharya,et al.  A piezoelectric model based multi-objective optimization of robot gripper design , 2016 .

[9]  Abhishek Das,et al.  Design synthesis methodology for dimensional management of assembly process with compliant non-ideal parts , 2014 .

[10]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Fast Proximity Queries with Swept Sphere Volumes , 1999 .

[11]  Daniel Wappling,et al.  Model driven mechatronic design optimization of a linear axis press tending robot , 2013, IEEE ISR 2013.

[12]  Rajendra Patel,et al.  Optimization-based development of ultra high performance Twin Robot Xbar press tending robot system , 2013, IEEE ISR 2013.

[13]  Bengt Lennartson,et al.  Improved Constructive Cooperative Coevolutionary Differential Evolution for Large-Scale Optimisation , 2015, 2015 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence.

[14]  Pasquale Franciosa,et al.  Hierarchical synthesis of multi-level design parameters in assembly system , 2015 .

[15]  S. LaValle,et al.  Motion Planning , 2008, Springer Handbook of Robotics.

[16]  Huifang Li,et al.  Optimal trajectory planning for material handling of compliant sheet metal parts , 2002 .

[17]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes , 2012, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[18]  Rajendra Patel,et al.  New robot concept for ultra high performance press tending robot system , 2013, IEEE ISR 2013.

[19]  Peter Tuleja,et al.  UNILATERAL GRIPPING WITH ACTIVE VACUUM SUCTION CUP: CALCULATION OF GRIPPING FORCE AND NUMBER OF SUCTION CUPS , 2014 .

[20]  Tomas Jansson,et al.  Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization – with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming , 2003 .

[21]  Hartmut Hoffmann,et al.  Strategies to optimize the part transport in crossbar transfer presses , 2002 .

[22]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures , 2013 .

[23]  Guangyao Li,et al.  Reanalysis-based space mapping method, an alternative optimization way for expensive simulation-based problems , 2017 .

[24]  Pasquale Franciosa,et al.  Fixture capability optimisation for early-stage design of assembly system with compliant parts using nested polynomial chaos expansion , 2016 .

[25]  Gunther Reinhart,et al.  Method for the Automated Dimensioning of Gripper Systems , 2016 .

[26]  M. Pettersson,et al.  Application Adapted Performance Optimization for Industrial Robots , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[27]  Bengt Lennartson,et al.  Multi-objective constructive cooperative coevolutionary optimization of robotic press-line tending , 2017 .

[28]  Jihong Lee,et al.  A minimum-time trajectory planning method for two robots , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[29]  Darek Ceglarek,et al.  Modeling and Optimization of End Effector Layout for Handling Compliant Sheet Metal Parts , 2001 .

[30]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Fast distance queries with rectangular swept sphere volumes , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[31]  Xiaoyun Liao,et al.  Evolutionary path planning for robot assisted part handling in sheet metal bending , 2003 .

[32]  Bengt Lennartson,et al.  Constructive cooperative coevolutionary optimisation for interacting production stations , 2015 .