A tractable multiple agents protocol and algorithm for resource allocation under price rigidities

In many resource allocation problems, economy efficiency must be taken into consideration together with social equality, and price rigidities are often made according to some economic and social needs. We investigate the computational issues of dynamic mechanisms for selling multiple indivisible objects under price rigidities. We propose a multiple agents protocol and algorithm with polynomial time complexity that can achieve the over-demanded sets of items, and then introduce a dynamic mechanism with rationing to discover constrainedWalrasian equilibria under price rigidities in polynomial time. We also address the computation of buyers’ expected profits and items’ expected prices, and discuss strategical issues in the sense of expected profits.

[1]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  Computationally Manageable Combinational Auctions , 1998 .

[2]  Daniel Lehmann,et al.  Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities , 2001, EC '01.

[3]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Fair division of indivisible items between two people with identical preferences: Envy-freeness, Pareto-optimality, and equity , 2000, Soc. Choice Welf..

[4]  Jérôme Lang,et al.  A General Elicitation-Free Protocol for Allocating Indivisible Goods , 2011, IJCAI.

[5]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Electronic commerce , 2011, EC 2011.

[6]  Simina Brânzei,et al.  Externalities in Cake Cutting , 2013, IJCAI.

[7]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Truth, justice, and cake cutting , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[8]  Sylvain Bouveret,et al.  Fair Division of Indivisible Goods under Risk , 2012, ECAI.

[9]  Jason D. Hartline,et al.  Envy, truth, and profit , 2011, EC '11.

[10]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions , 2005, Encyclopedia of Wireless Networks.

[11]  Dolf Talman,et al.  A dynamic auction for differentiated items under price rigidities , 2008 .

[12]  Matjaz Gams,et al.  Discovering Strategic Behaviour of Multi-Agent Systems in Adversary Settings , 2014, Comput. Informatics.

[13]  Zaifu Yang,et al.  A Double‐Track Adjustment Process for Discrete Markets With Substitutes and Complements , 2009 .

[14]  Toby Walsh,et al.  Strategic Behavior when Allocating Indivisible Goods Sequentially , 2013, AAAI.

[15]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Cake cutting: not just child's play , 2013, CACM.

[16]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Compositional Verification of a Multi-Agent System for One-to-Many Negotiation , 2004, Applied Intelligence.

[17]  Mingyu Guo,et al.  Revenue Maximization via Hiding Item Attributes , 2013, IJCAI.

[18]  Kurosh Madani,et al.  An adaptive approach for decision making tactics in automated negotiation , 2013, Applied Intelligence.

[19]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Optimal Envy-Free Cake Cutting , 2011, AAAI.

[20]  Toby Walsh,et al.  A Social Welfare Optimal Sequential Allocation Procedure , 2013, IJCAI.

[21]  Zizhuo Wang,et al.  A unified framework for dynamic pari-mutuel information market design , 2009, EC '09.

[22]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[23]  Lawrence M. Ausubel An efficient dynamic auction for heterogeneous commodities , 2006 .

[24]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  On Maxsum Fair Cake Divisions , 2012, AAAI.

[25]  Ennio Stacchetti,et al.  The English Auction with Differentiated Commodities , 2000, J. Econ. Theory.

[26]  Néjib Moalla,et al.  Smart places: Multi-agent based smart mobile virtual community management system , 2014, Applied Intelligence.

[27]  Alexander Schrijver,et al.  Combinatorial optimization. Polyhedra and efficiency. , 2003 .

[28]  Jaime F. Zender,et al.  Auctioning divisible goods , 2002 .

[29]  Dongmo Zhang,et al.  Dynamic Auction: A Tractable Auction Procedure , 2010, AAAI.

[30]  Faruk Gul,et al.  WALRASIAN EQUILIBRIUM WITH GROSS SUBSTITUTES , 1999 .

[31]  Yann Chevaleyre,et al.  Simple negotiation schemes for agents with simple preferences: sufficiency, necessity and maximality , 2010, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[32]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Approximating Revenue-Maximizing Combinatorial Auctions , 2005, AAAI.

[33]  Toby Walsh,et al.  Strategic Behavior in a Decentralized Protocol for Allocating Indivisible Good , 2012 .