Numerical Analysis of Zirconium and Titanium Implants under the Effect of Critical Masticatory Load

Dental implants have become an alternative to replace the teeth of people suffering from edentulous and meet the physiological and morphological characteristics (recovering 95% of the chewing function). The evolution and innovation of biomaterials for dental implants have had a trajectory that dates back to prehistory, where dental pieces were replaced by ivory or seashells, to the present day, where they are replaced by metallic materials such as titanium or ceramics such as zirconium or fiberglass. The numerical evaluation focuses on comparing the stress distribution and general displacement between different dental implants and a healthy tooth when applying a force of 850 N. For the analysis, a model of the anatomical structure was developed of a healthy tooth considering three essential parts of the tooth (enamel, dentin, and pulp). The tooth biomodel was established through computed tomography. Three dental implant models were considered by changing the geometry of the abutment. A structural simulation was carried out by applying the finite element method (FEM). In addition, the material considered for the analyses was zirconium oxide (ZrO2), which was compared against titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V). The analyses were considered with linear, isotropic, and homogeneous properties. The variables included in the biomodeling were the modulus of elasticity, Poisson’s ratio, density, and elastic limit. The results obtained from the study indicated a significant difference in the biomechanical behavior of the von Mises forces and the displacement between the healthy tooth and the titanium and zirconium implant models. However, the difference between the titanium implant and the zirconium implant is minimal because one is more rigid, and the other is more tenacious.

[1]  J. Suthakorn,et al.  Surface coating of orthopedic implant to enhance the osseointegration and reduction of bacterial colonization: a review , 2022, Biomaterials Research.

[2]  H. Haugen,et al.  Is There a Better Biomaterial for Dental Implants than Titanium?—A Review and Meta-Study Analysis , 2022, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[3]  I. Yeo,et al.  Three interfaces of the dental implant system and their clinical effects on hard and soft tissues. , 2022, Materials horizons.

[4]  K. Gulati,et al.  Advancing dental implants: Bioactive and therapeutic modifications of zirconia , 2021, Bioactive materials.

[5]  Mostafa Alam,et al.  The Role of Biomaterials and Biocompatible Materials in Implant-Supported Dental Prosthesis , 2021, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[6]  Wei Wang,et al.  The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  Zirconium dioxide implants as an alternative to titanium: A systematic review , 2021, Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.

[8]  Rosa Alicia Hernández-Vázquez,et al.  High Biofidelity 3D Biomodel Reconstruction from Soft and Hard Tissues (Knee), FEM, and 3D Printing: A Three-Dimensional Methodological Proposal , 2021, BioMed research international.

[9]  H. Koo,et al.  The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[10]  T. Jemt,et al.  On marginal bone level changes around dental implants. , 2021, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[11]  J. Nicholson Titanium Alloys for Dental Implants: A Review , 2020 .

[12]  T. Hanawa Zirconia versus titanium in dentistry: A review. , 2020, Dental materials journal.

[13]  I. Yeo,et al.  Biological Responses to the Transitional Area of Dental Implants: Material- and Structure-Dependent Responses of Peri-Implant Tissue to Abutments , 2019, Materials.

[14]  Rodrigo Arturo Marquet-Rivera,et al.  Numerical Analysis of a Dental Zirconium Restoration and the Stresses That Occur in Dental Tissues , 2019, Applied bionics and biomechanics.

[15]  Junes Abdul Villarraga Ossa,et al.  Evaluación de la micro-deformación de la zona maxilar anterior con regeneración. Análisis de elementos finitos , 2019, Odontología Sanmarquina.

[16]  L. Nistor,et al.  Zirconia Use in Dentistry - Manufacturing and Properties , 2019, Current health sciences journal.

[17]  Christopher René Torres San Miguel,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction for use in medicine and biomechanics , 2018 .

[18]  Guillermo Urriolagoitia Calderón,et al.  Computational biomodelling and numerical analysis as means of diagnostic and odontological prognosis , 2018 .

[19]  G. Urriolagoitia-Sosa,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Masticatory Forces on a Lower First Molar considering the Contact between Dental Tissues , 2018, Applied bionics and biomechanics.

[20]  Elluru Venkatesh,et al.  Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry , 2017, Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry.

[21]  M. Nicola,et al.  Ceramic Materials as an Alternative to Titanium for Dental Implant Fabrication , 2016 .

[22]  Á. Della Bona,et al.  Zirconia as a Dental Biomaterial , 2015, Materials.

[23]  S. Lohfeld,et al.  Biomodels of Bone: A Review , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  M. Păcurar,et al.  In vitro Study of the Effectiveness to Fractures of the Aesthetic Fixed Restorations Achieved from Zirconium and Alumina , 2014 .

[25]  G. U. Sosa Analysis of prior strain history effect on mechanical properties and residual stresses in beams , 2005 .