Effects of time-area closure on tropical tuna purse-seine fleet dynamics through some fishery indicators

Time-area closures have become a frequently used tool to control fishing effort and protect feeding and spawning areas. However, because time-area closure strata are mainly based on biological and ecological consider- ations, and do not accounts for fishermen's behavior-at-sea, this type of regulation tool may not entirely achieve its objectives. With the aim of comparing the impact of two different time-area regulations: (1) a moratorium on Fish Aggregating Devices (FAD) sets (1997-2005) and (2) a no-take area for surface fleets (2005-2010) on the dynamics of the European (EU) tuna purse seine fleet operating in the eastern tropical Atlantic, several fishery indicators were evaluated through a Before-After, Control-Impact (BACI) approach. The results showed that prior to any regulation, the fleet used to be concentrated within the Gulf of Guinea area. During the first years of the moratorium on FAD (from November to January within a large region in the eastern Atlantic) there was a movement towards outside the protected area, increasing the total sets on FAD (restricted fishing activity). In general, this moratorium fulfilled its objectives; however, it was not respected during the last years of this regulation. The no-take time-area closure restricted all tuna catches for the surface fisheries but only in November and within a small area (i.e., the Picolo zone). As a result, there was an increase in activities on free schools outside the no-take area. Our findings suggest the use of some simple fishery indicators to understand fleet dynamics as a complement of ecological information before implementing new time area closures. Furthermore, since tunas are highly mobile species, anticipating the possible re-allocation of effort of purse seiners to adjacent areas in response to the spatial regulation is required to design different candidate time-area closures and to evaluate their effectiveness to protect juvenile tunas.

[1]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Predicting the effects of area closures and fishing effort restrictions on the production, biomass, and species richness of benthic invertebrate communities , 2006 .

[2]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Managing mobile species with MPAs: the effects of mobility, larval dispersal, and fishing mortality on closure size , 2009 .

[3]  M. Freeman,et al.  Ignore fishers’ knowledge and miss the boat , 2000 .

[4]  Mar Ecol,et al.  Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species , 2008 .

[5]  Martin D. Smith,et al.  Avoiding surprises: Incorporating fisherman behavior into management models , 2002 .

[6]  L. L. Eberhardt,et al.  Designing Environmental Field Studies , 1991 .

[7]  Anthony D. M. Smith,et al.  Closure strategies as a tool for fisheries management in metapopulations subjected to catastrophic events , 2010 .

[8]  Steven A. Murawski,et al.  Large-scale closed areas as a fishery-management tool in temperate marine systems : The Georges Bank experience , 2000 .

[9]  A. Underwood.  Beyond BACI: the detection of environmental impacts on populations in the real, but variable, world , 1992 .

[10]  S. Ragnarsson,et al.  The effect of area closures on the demersal fish community off the east coast of Iceland , 2006 .

[11]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Analyzing the Effects of Accidental Environmental Impacts: Approaches and Assumptions , 1995 .

[12]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Are marine protected areas a red herring or fisheries panacea , 2005 .

[13]  G. J. Holland,et al.  Variation in the abundance of sandeels Ammodytes marinus off southeast Scotland: an evaluation of area-closure fisheries management and stock abundance assessment methods , 2006 .

[14]  Shane Abeare,et al.  Fishing effort redistribution in response to area closures , 2009 .

[15]  Roger M Nisbet,et al.  Fishing the line near marine reserves in single and multispecies fisheries. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  Shelton J. Harley,et al.  The potential use of time-area closures to reduce catches of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the purse-seine fishery of the eastern Pacific Ocean , 2007 .

[17]  Martin D. Smith,et al.  Economic impacts of marine reserves: the importance of spatial behavior , 2003 .

[18]  Jan Jaap Poos,et al.  An experiment on effort allocation of fishing vessels: the role of interference competition and area specialization , 2007 .

[19]  Michael J. Fogarty,et al.  Effort distribution and catch patterns adjacent to temperate MPAs , 2005 .

[20]  Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara,et al.  Mind the gap: Addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning , 2011 .

[21]  Serge M. Garcia,et al.  When can marine reserves improve fisheries management , 2004 .

[22]  D. Holland,et al.  Marine Reserves for Fisheries Management , 1996, Marine Resource Economics.

[23]  Eric P. Smith,et al.  Impact Assessment Using the Before-After-Control-Impact (BACI) Model: Concerns and Comments , 1993 .

[24]  Simon Jennings,et al.  Impact of a large-scale area closure on patterns of fishing disturbance and the consequences for benthic communities , 2003 .

[25]  Alan Hastings,et al.  COMPARING DESIGNS OF MARINE RESERVES FOR FISHERIES AND FOR BIODIVERSITY , 2003 .

[26]  Gavin Fay,et al.  Fleet dynamics and fishermen behavior: lessons for fisheries managers , 2006 .

[27]  K. Pitt,et al.  Using impact assessment methods to determine the effects of a marine reserve on abundances and sizes of valuable tropical invertebrates , 2006 .

[28]  R. Evans,et al.  Atlantic Skipjack Tuna: Influences of Mean Environmental Conditions on Their Vulnerability to Surface Fishing Gear , 1981 .

[29]  Javier Ariz,et al.  Observed changes in the species composition of tuna schools in the Gulf of Guinea between 1981 and 1999, in relation with the Fish Aggregating Device fishery , 2000 .

[30]  Gunnar Stefansson,et al.  Combining control measures for more effective management of fisheries under uncertainty: quotas, effort limitation and protected areas , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  D. Gaertner,et al.  Exploitation of small tunas by a purse-seine fishery with fish aggregating devices and their feeding ecology in an eastern tropical Atlantic ecosystem , 2000 .

[32]  E. Prince,et al.  Ocean scale hypoxia‐based habitat compression of Atlantic istiophorid billfishes , 2010 .

[33]  C. Walters,et al.  Local management of a "highly migratory species": the effects of long-line closures and recreational catch-and-release for Baja California striped marlin fisheries , 2010 .

[34]  D. Hart.  When do marine reserves increase fishery yield , 2006 .

[35]  L. Gerber,et al.  Review of the Southern Ocean Sanctuary: Marine Protected Areas in the context of the International Whaling Commission Sanctuary Programme , 2023, J. Cetacean Res. Manage..

[36]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  The economic efficiency of a time–area closure to protect spawning bluefin tuna , 2010 .

[37]  Daniel Gaertner,et al.  The behavioural dynamics of fishers: management implications , 2004 .

[38]  R. Parrish,et al.  MARINE RESERVES FOR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT: WHY NOT , 1999 .

[39]  J. Grabowski,et al.  The role of closed areas in rebuilding monkfish populations in the Gulf of Maine , 2008 .

[40]  D. Holland.  Integrating spatial management measures into traditional fishery management systems: the case of the Georges Bank multispecies groundfish fishery , 2003 .

[41]  J. Horwood,et al.  Evaluation of closed areas for fish stock conservation , 2008 .

[42]  K. Frank,et al.  Changes in finfish community structure associated with an offshore fishery closed area on the Scotian Shelf , 2002 .

[43]  A. Hastings,et al.  When are no-take zones an economically optimal fishery management strategy? , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.