Efficient inclusion of receptor flexibility in grid‐based protein–ligand docking*

Accounting for receptor flexibility is an essential component of successful protein–ligand docking but still marks a major computational challenge. For many target molecules of pharmaceutical relevance, global backbone conformational changes are relevant during the ligand binding process. However, popular methods that represent the protein receptor molecule as a potential grid typically assume a rigid receptor structure during ligand–receptor docking. A new approach has been developed that combines inclusion of global receptor flexibility with the efficient potential grid representation of the receptor molecule. This is achieved using interpolation between grid representations of the receptor protein deformed in selected collective degrees of freedom. The method was tested on the docking of three ligands to apo protein kinase A (PKA), an enzyme that undergoes global structural changes upon inhibitor binding. Structural variants of PKA were generated along the softest normal mode of an elastic network representation of apo PKA. Inclusion of receptor deformability during docking resulted in a significantly improved docking performance compared with rigid PKA docking, thus allowing for systematic virtual screening applications at small additional computational cost. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2011

[1]  Heinz Sklenar,et al.  Harmonic modes as variables to approximately account for receptor flexibility in ligand–receptor docking simulations: Application to DNA minor groove ligand complex , 1999 .

[2]  S. Kim,et al.  "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  V. Hornak,et al.  Targeting structural flexibility in HIV-1 protease inhibitor binding. , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[4]  Jonathan W. Essex,et al.  Ensemble Docking into Multiple Crystallographically Derived Protein Structures: An Evaluation Based on the Statistical Analysis of Enrichments , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[5]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Tackling the challenges posed by target flexibility in drug design , 2010, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[6]  X. Zou,et al.  Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking , 2006, Proteins.

[7]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  How to Efficiently Include Receptor Flexibility During Computational Docking , 2008 .

[8]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[9]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  M Gerstein,et al.  Analysis of protein loop closure. Two types of hinges produce one motion in lactate dehydrogenase. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Consistent Improvement of Cross-Docking Results Using Binding Site Ensembles Generated with Elastic Network Normal Modes , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[12]  X. Barril,et al.  Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  R. Engh,et al.  Structural aspects of protein kinase control-role of conformational flexibility. , 2002, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[15]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Four-dimensional docking: a fast and accurate account of discrete receptor flexibility in ligand docking. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  A. Leach,et al.  Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Natasja Brooijmans,et al.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[19]  Xavier Barril,et al.  Ensemble Docking from Homology Models. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[20]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions , 2002, Proteins.

[21]  K. Hinsen Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[22]  P E Wright,et al.  Backbone dynamics in dihydrofolate reductase complexes: role of loop flexibility in the catalytic mechanism. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[23]  B. Torbett,et al.  Conformational flexibility in the flap domains of ligand-free HIV protease. , 2007, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[24]  R. Huber,et al.  Crystal Structures of Catalytic Subunit of cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase in Complex with Isoquinolinesulfonyl Protein Kinase Inhibitors H7, H8, and H89 , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  R. Stroud,et al.  Predicting and harnessing protein flexibility in the design of species-specific inhibitors of thymidylate synthase. , 2001, Chemistry & biology.

[27]  Nguyen-Huu Xuong,et al.  Crystal structure of the potent natural product inhibitor balanol in complex with the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. , 1999 .

[28]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Collective motions in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: examination of flexibility and enzyme function. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock , 2002, Proteins.

[30]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[31]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[32]  N. Guex,et al.  SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[33]  R. Huber,et al.  Staurosporine-induced conformational changes of cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit explain inhibitory potential. , 1997, Structure.

[34]  M L Teodoro,et al.  Conformational flexibility models for the receptor in structure based drug design. , 2003, Current pharmaceutical design.

[35]  S. Teague Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[36]  Ernst Althaus,et al.  A Combinatorial Approach to Protein Docking with Flexible Side Chains , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[37]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  FlexProt: Alignment of Flexible Protein Structures Without a Predefinition of Hinge Regions , 2004, J. Comput. Biol..

[38]  J. Gready,et al.  Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design , 2006, Medicinal research reviews.

[39]  Heather A Carlson,et al.  Protein flexibility and species specificity in structure-based drug discovery: dihydrofolate reductase as a test system. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[40]  Yuan-Ping Pang,et al.  Prediction of the binding sites of huperzine A in acetylcholinesterase by docking studies , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[41]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998 .

[42]  M. Zacharias,et al.  Protein-ligand docking accounting for receptor side chain and global flexibility in normal modes: evaluation on kinase inhibitor cross docking. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[43]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  Somesh D. Sharma,et al.  Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[45]  Jacob D. Durrant,et al.  Computer-aided drug-discovery techniques that account for receptor flexibility. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[46]  A. Lesk,et al.  Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[47]  A M Lesk,et al.  Mechanisms of domain closure in proteins. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Protein flexibility and computer-aided drug design. , 2003, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[49]  Rafael Najmanovich,et al.  Side‐chain flexibility in proteins upon ligand binding , 2000, Proteins.

[50]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  Elastic Potential Grids: Accurate and Efficient Representation of Intermolecular Interactions for Fully Flexible Docking , 2009, ChemMedChem.

[51]  I Lasters,et al.  Computation of the binding of fully flexible peptides to proteins with flexible side chains , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.