Optimization of electrostatic separation Processes using response surface modeling

The efficiency of electrostatic separation processes depends on a multitude of factors, including the characteristics of the granular mixtures to be sorted, the feed rate, the configuration of the electrode system, the applied high voltage, and the environmental conditions. The possibility of optimizing the operation of industrial electrostatic separators using rather simple computed-assisted experimental design techniques has already been demonstrated. The aim of the present work is to analyze the peculiarities of application of a more sophisticated group of response surface experimental design techniques that make use of quadratic functions for modeling the electrostatic separation process. One unique contribution to this work is to consider the economic value of the process in addition to the technical result. The 11 electrostatic separation tests, corresponding to a central composite design, were carried out on samples of chopped electric wire wastes. The CARPCO laboratory roll-type electrostatic separator employed for this study enabled a rigorous control of two factors: the applied high-voltage level and the speed of the rotating roll electrode. The objective was to maximize the benefits from the recycling of both constituents of the binary copper-polyvinyl chloride granular mixture. The optimum operating conditions computed with the quadratic model derived from the experimental results were in good agreement with the data of pilot-plant tests. Thus, the highest extraction of useful materials was obtained at high voltage and low speed, while the optimum conditions for greatest economic value were found to be high voltage and high speed. The response surface methodology can be easily applied to most of the industrial applications of electrostatic separation technologies.

[1]  O. C. Ralston,et al.  Electrostatic separation of mixed granular solids , 1961 .

[2]  A. Iuga,et al.  Computer-assisted experimental design for the optimization of electrostatic separation processes , 2000, Conference Record of the 2000 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Fifth IAS Annual Meeting and World Conference on Industrial Applications of Electrical Energy (Cat. No.00CH37129).

[3]  R Fisher,et al.  Design of Experiments , 1936 .

[4]  James E. Lawver.  State of the Art of Electrostatic Separation of Minerals , 1969 .

[5]  J. I.  The Design of Experiments , 1936, Nature.

[6]  Lucian Dascalescu,et al.  Factors which influence the insulation-metal electroseparation , 1993 .

[7]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[8]  C. Ireland.  Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments , 1964 .

[9]  A. Iuga,et al.  Electrostatic separation of metals and plastics from granular industrial wastes , 1998, Conference Record of 1998 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Third IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.98CH36242).

[10]  Leonie Kohl,et al.  Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments , 2000 .

[11]  Lucian Dascalescu,et al.  ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF INSULATING AND CONDUCTIVE PARTICLES FROM GRANULAR MIXES , 1998 .

[12]  Ion I. Inculet,et al.  Electrostatic Mineral Separation , 1984 .

[13]  Y. Higashiyama,et al.  RECENT PROGRESS IN ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION TECHNOLOGY , 1998 .

[14]  Hilbert Schenck,et al.  Theories Of Engineering Experimentation , 1979 .

[15]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental Designs, 2nd Edition , 1950 .

[16]  Thomas D. Sandry,et al.  Practical Guide to Experimental Design , 1996, Technometrics.

[17]  Ion I. Inculet,et al.  ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF PLASTICS FOR RECYCLING , 1998 .

[18]  Lucian Dascalescu,et al.  Charges and forces on conductive particles in roll-type corona-electrostatic separators , 1993 .

[19]  R. Stephenson.  A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.