Evaluation of Performance of Dental Providers on Posterior Restorations: Does Experience Matter? A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach

The purpose of this study is to discern what factors affect the longevity of amalgam and of composite restorations by dentists who perform posterior restorations. Data are obtained from the Washington Dental Service and contain 1.5 million patient encounters representing visits to 23,000 providers from January 1993 through 31 December 1999. Analysis of provider performance is estimated through Data Envelopment Analysis. The principal finding is that the most efficient dentists produce posterior restorations that survive almost 5 months (4.6 months) longer than those by inefficient providers (χ2 = 18.98, p < 0.0001). The findings suggest that there is no difference in restoration longevity between amalgam and composite restorations when the restoration is performed by efficient provider.

[1]  Rourke Aj.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. , 1957, Hospital progress.

[2]  Y A Ozcan,et al.  Ownership and Organizational Performance: A Comparison of Technical Efficiency Across Hospital Types , 1992, Medical care.

[3]  G. Reader,et al.  Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, and Policy , 1992 .

[4]  K. Leinfelder.  Do restorations made of amalgam outlast those made of resin-based composite? , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[5]  Barbara Starfield,et al.  Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology , 1998 .

[6]  I. Krejci,et al.  Advanced adhesive restorations: the post-amalgam age. , 1996, Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry : PPAD.

[7]  D N Allan,et al.  A longitudinal study of dental restorations , 1977, British Dental Journal.

[8]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Simulating Weights Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis by Means of Unobserved Dmus , 1998 .

[9]  O. Aalen,et al.  Analysis of dependent survival data applied to lifetimes of amalgam fillings. , 1995, Statistics in Medicine.

[10]  H. Tobi,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of composite resins and amalgam in the replacement of amalgam Class II restorations. , 1998, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[11]  Malvin E. Ring,et al.  Dentistry: An Illustrated History , 1985 .

[12]  P. Brunton,et al.  Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[14]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[15]  Smith Wr,et al.  Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database. , 2002 .

[16]  P. Milgrom,et al.  An explanatory model of the dental care utilization of low-income children. , 1998, Medical care.

[17]  Yasar A Ozcan,et al.  A national study of efficiency for dialysis centers: an examination of market competition and facility characteristics for production of multiple dialysis outputs. , 2002, Health services research.

[18]  M. J. Bibby,et al.  Case study 5: Processing to produce automobile radiators , 1999 .

[19]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software , 2001 .

[20]  R. Hickel,et al.  Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  G. Christensen.  Amalgam vs. composite resin: 1998. , 1998, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[22]  Y. Ozcan,et al.  Efficiency Evaluation of Skilled Nursing Facilities , 1998, Journal of Medical Systems.

[23]  E. N. Gale,et al.  A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys. , 1991, Quintessence International.

[24]  Carol D. Berkowitz,et al.  Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, and Policy , 1994 .

[25]  E. Swift,et al.  Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. , 1999, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[26]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Porcelain & Composite Inlays & Onlays: Esthetic Posterior Restorations , 1994 .

[27]  Cook Ah.  Unnecessary amalgam replacements. , 2000 .

[28]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[29]  M. Kogan,et al.  The effect of gaps in health insurance on continuity of a regular source of care among preschool-aged children in the United States. , 1995, JAMA.

[30]  R. Hickel,et al.  Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry (Print).

[31]  Y A Ozcan,et al.  Physician benchmarking: measuring variation in practice behavior in treatment of otitis media , 1998, Health care management science.

[32]  Y A Ozcan,et al.  A national study of the efficiency of hospitals in urban markets. , 1993, Health services research.

[33]  S. Helminen.  Quality of care provided for young adults and adolescents in the Finnish public oral health service , 2000 .

[34]  Y A Ozcan,et al.  An assessment of efficiency of area agencies on aging in Virginia through data envelopment analysis. , 1994, The Gerontologist.