From Interactive Design to Reflective Design

This chapter offers to switch from the interactive to the reflective design paradigm. The book posits that interactive design relies on a model that focuses on activities and does not question the values and aesthetics of the artifact and therefore restricts the expansion into new norms, or new aesthetics. On the contrary, reflective design is about methods that generate new questions not only about functionalities, but also that explore new formats. Here media are considered as design tools and materials that contribute to “denaturalize” activities and forms and lay new foundations for a design project.

[1]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[2]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[3]  R. Stam.  Reflexivity in Film and Literature: From Don Quixote to Jean-Luc Godard , 1985 .

[4]  M. Iversen.  The Discourse of Perspective in the Twentieth Century: Panofsky, Damisch, Lacan , 2005 .

[5]  Hans Gelter,et al.  Why is reflective thinking uncommon , 2003 .

[6]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[7]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Peter Kroes,et al.  Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts , 2002 .

[9]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Reimagining HCI: toward a more human-centered perspective , 2011, INTR.

[10]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (2nd Edition) , 1999 .

[11]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 2000 .

[12]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[13]  James Engell,et al.  The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Volume VII: Biographia Literaria or Biographical Sketches of My Literary Life and Opinions , 1817 .

[14]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .

[15]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[16]  Linda Candy,et al.  EditorialInteraction design and creative practice , 2008 .

[17]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing , 1992 .

[18]  B. Babcock.  Reflexivity: Definitions and discriminations , 1980 .

[19]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[20]  Ernest A. Edmonds,et al.  Amplifying reflective thinking in musical performance , 2005, C&C '05.

[21]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Introduction: A Moving Target: The Evolution Of Hci , 2007 .

[22]  O. Grau,et al.  Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion , 2003 .

[23]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape , 2010, OZCHI '10.

[24]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Nathan Crilly,et al.  The Design Stance in User-System Interaction , 2011, Design Issues.

[26]  Paul Virilio.  Speed and Politics: An Essay on Dromology , 1986 .

[27]  Isabelle M. Demeure,et al.  Gaming on the move: urban experience as a new paradigm for mobile pervasive game design , 2008, MindTrek '08.

[28]  John Heskett,et al.  Design: A Very Short Introduction , 2005 .

[29]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[30]  Isabelle M. Demeure,et al.  Transhumance: A platform on a Mobile Ad hoc NETwork challenging collaborative gaming , 2008, 2008 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.

[31]  J. Simpson,et al.  The Oxford English Dictionary , 1884 .