Formats for other-initiation of repair across languages: An exercise in pragmatic typology

In conversation, people have to deal with problems of speaking, hearing, and understanding. We report on a cross-linguistic investigation of the conversational structure of other-initiated repair (also known as collaborative repair, feedback, requests for clarification, or grounding sequences). We take stock of formats for initiating repair across languages (comparable to English huh?, who?, y’mean X?, etc.) and find that different languages make available a wide but remarkably similar range of linguistic resources for this function. We exploit the patterned variation as evidence for several underlying concerns addressed by repair initiation: characterising trouble, managing responsibility, and handling knowledge. The concerns do not always point in the same direction and thus provide participants in interaction with alternative principles for selecting one format over possible others. By comparing conversational structures across languages, this paper contributes to pragmatic typology: the typology of systems of language use and the principles that shape them.

[1]  C. Habel,et al.  Language , 1931, NeuroImage.

[2]  D. Bolinger.  Yes—No Questions Are Not Alternative Questions , 1978 .

[3]  J. Svennevig.  Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair , 2008 .

[4]  E. Schegloff.  When 'others' initiate repair , 2000 .

[5]  付伶俐.  打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[6]  Kate Beeching,et al.  Gender, politeness and pragmatic particles in French , 2002 .

[7]  Michael A. Forrester,et al.  Analysing interactions in childhood : insights from conversation analysis , 2010 .

[8]  Kobin H. Kendrick,et al.  Huh? What? – A first survey in 21 languages , 2013 .

[9]  Jeffrey D. Robinson,et al.  A preference for progressivity in interaction , 2006, Language in Society.

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[11]  T. Stivers,et al.  Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives , 2007 .

[12]  Jeffrey D. Robinson,et al.  Using Full Repeats to Initiate Repair on Others’ Questions , 2010 .

[13]  Matthew Purver.  The Theory and Use of Clarification Requests in Dialogue , 2004 .

[14]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Collaborating on contributions to conversations , 1987 .

[15]  Michael Moerman.  The Preference for Self-Correction in a Tai Conversational Corpus. , 1977 .

[16]  J. Ohala,et al.  An Ethological Perspective on Common Cross-Language Utilization of F₀ of Voice , 1984, Phonetica.

[17]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Conversational Structure and Language Acquisition: The Role of Repetition in Tzeltal , 1998 .

[18]  Mark Dingemanse,et al.  Conversation across cultures , 2014 .

[19]  Galina B. Bolden.  Beyond Answering: Repeat-Prefaced Responses in Conversation , 2009 .

[20]  Gene H. Lerner.  On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate , 2004 .

[21]  Jeffrey D. Robinson.  Managing Trouble Responsibility and Relationships During Conversational Repair , 2006 .

[22]  Jack Sidnell,et al.  Conversation Analysis: List of tables , 2009 .

[23]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Position of interrogative phrases in content questions , 2013 .

[24]  R. Arundale.  Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness , 2006 .

[25]  James McElvenny,et al.  Die Sprachwissenschaft: Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden Und Bisherigen Ergebnisse , 2015 .

[26]  鈴木 佳奈.  Other-initiated repair in Japanese : accomplishing mutual understanding in conversation , 2010 .

[27]  Corinna Elsenbroich.  Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality , 2015 .

[28]  R. Wu.  Conversation Analysis: Repetition in the initiation of repair , 2009 .

[29]  Jakob Steensig,et al.  The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation: List of transcription and glossing symbols , 2011 .

[30]  Margret Selting.  Fremdkorrekturen als Manifestationsformen von Verständigungsproblemen , 1987 .

[31]  T. Benjamin.  Signaling trouble: on the linguistic design of other-initiation of repair in English conversation , 2012 .

[32]  E. Schegloff.  On Dispensability , 2004 .

[33]  T. Stivers,et al.  Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights From Second Position , 2005 .

[34]  Margret Selting.  Verständigungsprobleme : eine empirische Analyse am Beispiel der Bürger-Verwaltungs-Kommunikation , 1987 .

[35]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction , 1979 .

[36]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Language in a Social Perspective. , 1971 .

[37]  P. Drew.  'Open' class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation , 1997 .

[38]  Ursula Faber,et al.  Sequence Organization In Interaction A Primer In Conversation Analysis , 2016 .

[39]  N. J. Enfield,et al.  A grammar of Lao , 2007 .

[40]  Jakob Steensig,et al.  The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation: Acknowledgements , 2011 .

[41]  T. Curl.  Practices in Other-Initiated Repair Resolution: The Phonetic Differentiation of 'Repetitions' , 2005 .

[42]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  R. A. Hinde,et al.  Interactions, Relationships and Social Structure , 1976 .

[44]  Jack Sidnell,et al.  Person reference in interaction: Repairing person reference in a small Caribbean community , 2007 .

[45]  S. Levinson,et al.  Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages: An introduction , 2010 .

[46]  M. Egbert.  Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator bitte? , 1996, Language in Society.

[47]  Francisco Torreira,et al.  Is “Huh?” a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items , 2013, PloS one.

[48]  Caroline Olivier.  L'art et la manière : comment dans les stratégies discursives , 1985 .

[49]  Barbara A. Fox,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Resources and repair: a cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair , 1996 .

[50]  John Heritage,et al.  The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge , 2012 .

[51]  E. Schegloff.  Sequence Organization in Interaction: Contents , 2007 .

[52]  Akio Kamio.  The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese , 1994 .

[53]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other‐initiated repair , 1997 .

[54]  Maria Egbert,et al.  Der Reparatur-Mechanismus in deutschen Gesprächen , 2009 .

[55]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[56]  Csr Young,et al.  How to Do Things With Words , 2009 .

[57]  Bincjyun Li. Fujian.  Gender, politeness and pragmatic particles in French , 2004 .

[58]  J. R. Firth,et al.  The Tongues of Men and Speech , 1968 .

[59]  Yang Na.  Gunter Senft, Jan-Ola Östman, & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Culture and language use . (Handbook of pragmatics highlights 2.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009. Pp. xiii, 280. Pb. $59. , 2011, Language in Society.

[60]  Geoffrey Raymond,et al.  The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction , 2005 .

[61]  M. Selting.  Prosody in conversation: Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: the case of so-called ‘astonished’ questions in repair initiation , 1996 .

[62]  Jeffrey D. Robinson.  Conversational Repair and Human Understanding: Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: the case of partial questioning repeats , 2013 .

[63]  D. Schiffrin.  Meaning, form, and use in context : linguistic applications , 1984 .

[64]  Jakob Steensig,et al.  The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation: Proposing shared knowledge as a means of pursuing agreement , 2011 .

[65]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Appendix B. On "Understanding" in the Analysis of Natural Conversation , 1988 .

[66]  Marja-Leena Sorjonen,et al.  Interaction and grammar: On repeats and responses in Finnish conversations , 1996 .

[67]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[68]  S. Levinson.  Presumptive Meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature , 2001 .

[69]  C. Gussenhoven.  The phonology of tone and intonation , 2004 .

[70]  T. Benjamin.  When Problems Pass Us By: Using “You Mean” to Help Locate the Source of Trouble , 2012 .

[71]  Russell Ultan,et al.  Some General Characteristics of Interrogative Systems. Working Papers on Language Universals, No. 1. , 1969 .

[72]  Nicole Dehé,et al.  An intonational grammar for Icelandic , 2009, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[73]  Maria Egbert,et al.  Conversation Analysis: Repairing reference , 2009 .

[74]  Joe Blythe.  Doing referring in Murriny Patha conversation , 2009 .

[75]  Kyu-hyun Kim.  Other-Initiated Repair Sequences in Korean Conversations , 1999 .

[76]  J. Baxter.  Relations with the public , 1976 .

[77]  Michael Cysouw,et al.  Content Interrogatives in Pichis Ashéninca: Corpus Study and Typological Comparison , 2007, International Journal of American Linguistics.