Percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression and outpatient laminectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a 2-year Medicare claims benchmark study

[1]  T. Deer,et al.  The MOTION study: Two‐year results of a real‐world randomized controlled trial of the mild® procedure for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis , 2023, Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain.

[2]  S. Kurtz,et al.  State and Government Administrative Databases: Medicare, National Inpatient Sample (NIS), and State Inpatient Databases (SID) Programs. , 2022, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  T. Lamer,et al.  Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) , 2022, Journal of pain research.

[4]  E. Washabaugh,et al.  The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild® Procedure: One-Year Results , 2022, Pain medicine.

[5]  S. Puri,et al.  Minimally invasive direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: impact of multiple prior epidural steroid injections. , 2021, Pain management.

[6]  J. Steurer,et al.  The influence of comorbidities on the treatment outcome in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, North American Spine Society journal.

[7]  N. Mekhail,et al.  The durability of minimally invasive lumbar decompression procedure in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: Long‐term follow‐up , 2021, Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain.

[8]  T. Deer,et al.  Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a review of indications, techniques, efficacy and safety. , 2020, Pain management.

[9]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[10]  M. Boakye,et al.  Surgery for Spinal Stenosis: Long-Term Reoperation Rates, Health Care Cost, and Impact of Instrumentation , 2014, Spine.

[11]  S. Hahn,et al.  Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study. , 2013, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  R. Deyo,et al.  Interspinous Spacers Compared With Decompression or Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis: Complications and Repeat Operations in the Medicare Population , 2013, Spine.

[13]  A. Lenkoski,et al.  Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[14]  R. Deyo,et al.  Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  R. Deyo,et al.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. , 2010, JAMA.

[16]  Brett Hanscom,et al.  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Deyo,et al.  Reoperation Rates Following Lumbar Spine Surgery and the Influence of Spinal Fusion Procedures , 2007, Spine.

[18]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2022, Pain Medicine.

[19]  M. Harris,et al.  Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  C. Steiner,et al.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. , 1998, Medical care.