Three‐dimensional inversion of regional P and S arrival times in the East Aleutians and sources of subduction zone gravity highs

Free-air gravity highs over forearcs represent a large fraction of the power in the Earth's anomalous field, yet their origin remains uncertain. Seismic velocities, as indicators of density, are estimated here as a means to compare the relative importance of upper plate sources for the gravity high with sources in the downgoing plate. P and S arrival times for local earthquakes, recorded by a seismic network in the eastern Aleutians, are inverted for three-dimensional velocity structure between the volcanic arc and the downgoing plate. A three-dimensional ray tracing scheme is used to invert the 7974 P and 6764 S arrivals for seismic velocities and hypocenters of 635 events. One-dimensional inversions show that station P residuals are systematically 0.25–0.5 s positive at stations 0–30 km north of the Aleutian volcanic arc, indicating slow material, while residuals at stations 10–30 km south of the arc are 0.1–0.25 s negative. Both features are explained in three-dimensional inversions by velocity variations at depths less than 25–35 km. Tests using a one-dimensional or a two-dimensional slab starting model show that below 100 km depth, velocities are poorly determined and trade off almost completely with hypocenters for earthquakes at these depths. The locations of forearc velocity highs, in the crust of the upper plate, correspond to the location of the gravity high between the trench and volcanic arc. Free-air anomalies, calculated from the three-dimensional velocity inversion result, match observed gravity for a linear density-velocity relationship between 0.1 and 0.3 (Mg m−3)/(km s−1), when a 50-km-thick slab is included with a density of 0.055±0.005 Mg m−3. Values outside these ranges do not match the observed gravity. The slab alone contributes one third to one half of the total 75–150 mGal amplitude of the gravity high but predicts a high that is much broader than is observed. The inclusion of upper-plate velocity anomalies predicts the correct width of the anomaly, 100–150 km, where the anomaly is most positive. Because the forearc gravity high is continuous along the entire Aleutian arc and is found in most arcs globally, high upper-plate forearc velocities are suspected to be a common feature of the upper plate of most subduction zones. The forearc mass excesses appear to be sustained by upward regional flexure of the upper plate that partly balances the depression of the lower plate at the trench, thus elevating high-density and high-velocity material. Thus a part of the downward flexure of the subducting plate is regionally compensated by shallow positive mass anomalies in the upper plate, and the strength of the upper plate helps generate the forearc gravity highs.

[1]  B. Hager Subducted slabs and the geoid: Constraints on mantle rheology and flow , 1983 .

[2]  J. Grow,et al.  Evidence for high‐density crust and mantle beneath the Chile Trench due to the descending lithosphere , 1975 .

[3]  E. Hauksson,et al.  Seismicity patterns (1963-1983) as stress indicators in the Shumagin seismic gap, Alaska , 1984 .

[4]  C. Finn Geophysical constraints on Washington Convergent Margin Structure , 1990 .

[5]  Y. Tsai,et al.  Three‐dimensional P and S wave velocity structures beneath Taiwan: Deep structure beneath an arc‐continent collision , 1987 .

[6]  M. Reyners,et al.  Fine structure of the dipping seismic zone and subduction mechanics in the Shumagin Islands, Alaska , 1982 .

[7]  A. Hasegawa,et al.  P wave tomographic imaging of the crust and upper mantle beneath the Japan Islands , 1993 .

[8]  Manik Talwani,et al.  Computer Usage in the Computation of Gravity Anomalies , 1973 .

[9]  Jonathan M. Lees,et al.  Seismic tomography constrained by bouguer gravity anomalies: Applications in western Washington , 1991 .

[10]  J. Grow Crustal and Upper Mantle Structure of the Central Aleutian Arc , 1973 .

[11]  P. Barton The relationship between seismic velocity and density in the continental crust — a useful constraint? , 1986 .

[12]  S. Roecker Velocity structure of the Pamir‐Hindu Kush Region: Possible evidence of subducted crust , 1982 .

[13]  R. Huene,et al.  OBSERVATIONS AT CONVERGENT MARGINS CONCERNING SEDIMENT SUBDUCTION, SUBDUCTION EROSION, AND THE GROWTH , 1991 .

[14]  M. Kogan Gravity field of the Kuril-Kamchatka arc and its relation to the thermal regime of the lithosphere , 1975 .

[15]  D. L. Anderson A Seismic Equation of State , 1967 .

[16]  M. Talwani,et al.  Gravity Anomalies Seaward of Deep-Sea Trenches and their Tectonic Implications* , 1974 .

[17]  R. Blakely,et al.  Volcanism, isostatic residual gravity and regional tectonic setting of the Cascade volcanic province , 1990 .

[18]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Simultaneous travel time inversion for earthquake location and subduction zone structure in the Central Aleutian Islands , 1987 .

[19]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Generalized Nonlinear Inverse Problems Solved Using the Least Squares Criterion (Paper 1R1855) , 1982 .

[20]  T. Utsu REGIONAL VARIATION OF TRAVEL-TIME RESIDUALS OF P WAVES FROM NEARBY DEEP EARTHQUAKES IN JAPAN AND VICINITY , 1975 .

[21]  G. Abers,et al.  Deep structure of an arc-continent collision: Earthquake relocation and inversion for upper mantle P and S wave velocities beneath Papua New Guinea , 1991 .

[22]  F. Wilson The Meshik Arc: An eocene to earliest miocene magmatic arc on the Alaska Peninsula , 1985 .

[23]  G. Pavlis Appraising relative earthquake location errors , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[24]  S. Wdowinski Dynamically supported trench topography , 1992 .

[25]  P. Steinhauser,et al.  On the isostatic state of the eastern Alps and the central Andes; A statistical comparison , 1991 .

[26]  K. Jacob,et al.  The upper mantle beneath the Aleutian Island Arc from pure-path Rayleigh-wave dispersion data , 1972, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[27]  G. Abers Relationship between shallow‐ and intermediate‐depth seismicity in the Eastern Aleutian Subduction Zone , 1992 .

[28]  F. Birch The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars: 1. , 1960 .

[29]  T. Little,et al.  Tertiary tectonics of the Border Ranges Fault System, Chugach Mountains, Alaska: Deformation and uplift in a forearc setting , 1989 .

[30]  K. Jacob Global tectonic implications of anomalous seismic P traveltimes from the nuclear explosion longshot , 1972 .

[31]  M. Talwani,et al.  Gravity Effect of Downgoing Lithospheric Slabs beneath Island Arcs , 1975 .

[32]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Subduction zone Calibration and teleseismic relocation of thrust zone events in the central Aleutian Islands , 1981 .

[33]  A. Hasegawa,et al.  3-D seismic velocity structure of the crust and the uppermost mantle in the northeastern Japan Arc , 1990 .

[34]  E. Hauksson Structure of the Benioff Zone beneath the Shumagin Islands, Alaska: Relocation of local earthquakes using three‐dimensional ray tracing , 1985 .

[35]  J. Virieux,et al.  Ray tracing for earthquake location in laterally heterogeneous media , 1988 .

[36]  D. McAdoo Geoid anomalies in the vicinity of subduction zones , 1981 .