Exploring the Effect of Distance: An Experimental Investigation of Virtual Collaboration, Social Loafing, and Group Decisions

Contemporary businesses are rapidly embracing virtual collaboration as a flexible, cheaper, and more efficient method for conducting group work. Past research has shown, however, that virtual groups operate quite differently than face‐to‐face groups. In this study, Social Impact Theory provides a framework to investigate whether virtual collaboration heightens social loafing—the tendency for individuals to contribute less than full effort to a group. The theory predicts that member distance, inherent in virtual collaboration, increases the propensity of group members to loaf, and decreases group performance. Two hundred seventy‐nine participants assigned to face‐to‐face or virtual groups completed a business resources allocation task. Results suggest that virtual collaboration negatively affects group performance and that social loafing behavior may partially explain this result. The findings imply that organizations should carefully consider whether virtual collaboration can be seamlessly substituted for...

[1]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[2]  K. Williams,et al.  Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. , 1981 .

[3]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Collaborative learning and computer‐supported groups , 1999 .

[4]  J. George.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Origins of Perceived Social Loafing in Organizations , 1992 .

[5]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[6]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Information technology support for collaborative decision making in auditing: An experimental investigation , 1996, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  K. H. Price.  Decision responsibility, task responsibility, identifiability, and social loafing , 1987 .

[8]  D. Comer.  A Model of Social Loafing in Real Work Groups , 1995 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  William F. Messier.  The Sequencing of Audit Evidence: Its Impact on the Extent of Audit Testing and Report Formulation , 1992 .

[11]  Roland E. Kidwell,et al.  Withholding Effort in Organizations: Toward Development and Validation of a Measure , 2003 .

[12]  David A. Kravitz,et al.  Ringelmann rediscovered: the original article , 1986 .

[13]  Casey M. Rowe.  The Effect of Accounting Report Structure and Team Structure on Performance in Cross‐Functional Teams , 2004 .

[14]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Leon A. Delooff.  Information Systems Outsourcing Decision Making: A Framework, Organizational Theories and Case Studies , 1995 .

[17]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Geoffrey B. Sprinkle.  The Effect of Incentive Contracts on Learning and Performance , 2000 .

[19]  Robert Libby,et al.  Incentives, Effort, And The Cognitive-Processes Involved In Accounting-Related Judgments , 1992 .

[20]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[21]  S. Ahlawat,et al.  Order effects and memory for evidence in individual versus group decision making in auditing , 1999 .

[22]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Training for virtual teams: An investigation of current practices and future needs , 2006 .

[23]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Decision making performance of interacting groups: an experimental investigation of the effects of task type and communication mode , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[25]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  Employee Propensity to Withhold Effort: A Conceptual Model to Intersect Three Avenues of Research , 1993 .

[26]  Frances Cairncross.  The death of distance : how the communications revolution will change our lives , 1997 .

[27]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  J. Arthur Woodward,et al.  Individual differences in verbal memory performance: A test of alternative information-processing models , 1982 .

[29]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Audit groups and group support systems: a framework and propositions for future research , 1998 .

[30]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  PROCESSES Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[32]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[33]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Effects of Four Modes of Group Communication on the Outcomes of Software Requirements Determination , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  R. Liden,et al.  Social Loafing: A Field Investigation , 2004 .

[35]  Geoffrey B. Sprinkle.  Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting , 2003 .

[36]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Achievement Motivation, Expected Coworker Performance, and Collective Task Motivation: Working Hard or Hardly Working?1 , 2004 .

[37]  E. Salas,et al.  Virtual Teams: Effects of Technological Mediation on Team Performance , 2003 .

[38]  Kelly S. Bouas,et al.  The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership change , 1995, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[39]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[40]  Andrés Guiral,et al.  Are Spanish auditors skeptical in going concern evaluations , 2006 .

[41]  Charles E. Downing,et al.  The Value of Outsourcing: A Field Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[42]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[43]  Benson Rosen,et al.  ASSESSING THE INCREMENTAL VALIDITY OF TEAM CONSENSUS RATINGS OVER AGGREGATION OF INDIVIDUAL‐LEVEL DATA IN PREDICTING TEAM EFFECTIVENESS , 2001 .

[44]  Brian R. Dineen.  Teamxchange: A Team Project Experience Involving Virtual Teams and Fluid Team Membership , 2005 .

[45]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Information Technology Sourcing Practices: Lessons From Experience , 1998, MIS Q..

[46]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Eliminating recency with self‐review: the case of auditors' ‘going concern’ judgments , 2002 .

[47]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice , 1990 .

[48]  S. Weisband.  Maintaining Awareness in Distributed Team Collaboration: Implications for Leadership and Performance , 2002 .

[49]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation Gains in Computer‐Supported Groups1 , 2003 .

[50]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[51]  Leon A. de Looff,et al.  Information systems outsourcing decision making: a framework organizational theories and case studies , 1995, J. Inf. Technol..

[52]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Combining the judgments of experts: How many and which ones? , 1986 .

[53]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[54]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[55]  Youngjin Kim.  Supporting Distributed Groups with Group Support Systems: A Study of the Effect of Group Leaders and Communication Modes on Group Performance , 2006, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[56]  Eileen Z. Taylor,et al.  The Effect of Incentives on Knowledge Sharing in Computer-Mediated Communication: An Experimental Investigation , 2006, J. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Ed O'Donnell,et al.  The influence of process-focused knowledge acquisition on evaluative judgment during a systems assurance task , 2003, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Gerald E. Larson,et al.  SELF-REPORTED EFFORT VERSUS ACTUAL PERFORMANCE IN INFORMATION PROCESSING PARADIGMS , 1995 .

[59]  R. Spears,et al.  De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication , 1990 .

[60]  W. Ken Harmon,et al.  Contracting for Information System Outsourcing with Multiple Bidders , 2002, J. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Constantine Sedikides,et al.  Social Impact Theory: A Field Test of Source Strength, Source Immediacy and Number of Targets , 1990 .

[62]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Radical Innovation Without Collocation: A Case Study at Boeing-Rocketdyne , 2001, MIS Q..