Shared control architectures for haptic training: Performance and coupled stability analysis

A novel shared control architecture is presented for dual-user haptic training simulation systems for enhanced interaction between the users and between each user and the virtual environment. The coupled stability of the proposed control architecture against uncertainties in the environment and the user’s dynamics is investigated using the three-port master–slave network model of the dual-user haptic simulation system. For this purpose, Llewellyn’s unconditional stability criterion is applied to an equivalent two-port network model obtained from the corresponding three-port network, considering the environment as a load termination. The kinesthetic performance of the proposed architecture is numerically analyzed for transparency and evaluated against a benchmark control architecture under different operating conditions, such as various types of environments, users’ grasps, and levels of dominance of users over the task. An experimental user study is carried out to assess the effectiveness of the proposed architecture in terms of users’ perception of environment stiffness sensing, device agility, and haptic guidance reception.

[1]  M. Safonov,et al.  Real/complex multivariable stability margin computation via generalized Popov multiplier-LMI approach , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[2]  James Edward Colgate Coupled Stability of Multiport Systems—Theory and Experiments , 1994 .

[3]  Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad,et al.  A four-channel multilateral shared control architecture for dual-user teleoperation systems , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  B. Anderson,et al.  On the Existence of H Matrices , 1966 .

[5]  Allen R. Stubberud,et al.  Digital Control System Design , 1988 .

[6]  Craig R. Carignan,et al.  Cooperative control of virtual objects over the Internet using force-reflecting master arms , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[7]  Nobuo Nagai Linear Circuits: Systems and Signal Processing: Advanced Theory and Applications , 2020 .

[8]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Time domain passivity control of haptic interfaces , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[9]  R. Howe,et al.  Identification of the mechanical impedance at the human finger tip. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  Yuichi Matsumoto,et al.  Realization of "law of action and reaction" by multilateral control , 2004, The 8th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2004. AMC '04..

[11]  Kouhei Ohnishi,et al.  A realization of haptic training system by multilateral control , 2004, 30th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2004. IECON 2004.

[12]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Robust impedance shaping telemanipulation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[13]  Shahin Sirouspour,et al.  Stability and Performance Analysis of Centralized and Distributed Multi-rate Control Architectures for Multi-user Haptic Interaction , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  P.X. Liu,et al.  Design and implementation of a collaborative virtual haptic surgical training system , 2005, IEEE International Conference Mechatronics and Automation, 2005.

[15]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Control law design for haptic interfaces to virtual reality , 2002, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[16]  B. Khademian,et al.  A robust multilateral shared controller for dual-user teleoperation systems , 2008, 2008 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[17]  Dale A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[18]  Shahin Sirouspour,et al.  Haptic-enabled Collaborative Training with Generalized Force and Position Mappings , 2008, 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[19]  R. Mavaddat Network Scattering Parameters , 1996, Advanced Series in Circuits and Systems.

[20]  D. Pozar Microwave Engineering , 1990 .

[21]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Analysis of Control Architectures for Teleoperation Systems with Impedance/Admittance Master and Slave Manipulators , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[22]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[23]  Ranjan Mukherjee,et al.  A shared-control approach to haptic interface design for minimally invasive telesurgical training , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[24]  Simon S. Haykin,et al.  Active Network Theory. , 1970 .

[25]  Paul Evrard,et al.  Homotopy switching model for dyad haptic interaction in physical collaborative tasks , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[26]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Visuohaptic simulation of bone surgery for training and evaluation , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[27]  Shahin Sirouspour,et al.  Modeling and control of cooperative teleoperation systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[28]  Mahdi Tavakoli,et al.  Haptics for Teleoperated Surgical Robotic Systems , 2008, New Frontiers in Robotics.