The Effect of Specimen Preparation on Post-Excision and Post-Fixation Dimensions, Translation, and Distortion of Canine Cadaver Skin-Muscle-Fascia Specimens.

OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of various tissue apposition techniques on specimens after formalin fixation, and to assess canine cadaveric composite skin-muscle-fascia specimen changes after excision without and with addition of a tumor model. STUDY DESIGN Canine cadaveric study; unbalanced paired design. ANIMALS Fresh canine cadavers (n = 30) METHODS: Experiment 1: Paired 7 cm diameter, circular skin-muscle-fascia specimens were harvested bilaterally from three sites (thorax, abdomen, and thigh) on 10 cadavers. For each pair, the skin-to-fascia was sutured with a circumferential continuous pattern in one specimen and left unsutured in the other during excision. Specimen length and width were measured post-excision and post-fixation. Specimen rotation, translation, and distortion was measured post-fixation. Experiment 2: A subcutaneous tumor model was implanted at 2 sites (neck, thorax) on 20 cadavers and specimens were then excised with 2 cm lateral margins and a deep fascial plane. Three suturing techniques of the skin-to-fascia at both sites were performed during excision: unsutured versus circumferential continuous suture (10 pairs) or circumferential versus 4 interrupted quadrant sutures (10 pairs). Lateral margins were compared post-excision and post-fixation. RESULTS Experiment 1: There was significant reduction in the length and width of the fascia and skin post-excision, but no further reduction after fixation. The circumferential suture decreased rotation and translation of the tissue layers but did not significantly affect specimen shrinkage or distortion compared with the unsutured specimen. Experiment 2: All 4 lateral margins decreased significantly post-excision and post-fixation compared with the planned pre-excision margins. No difference was found between any of the 4 lateral margins for any skin-to-fascia suture technique. CONCLUSION Canine skin-muscle-fascia specimens significantly decrease in size from gross pre-excision dimensions after removal. Suturing the specimen during surgery before excision will significantly improve alignment of tissue planes without creating distortion of the sample, but may alter the length, width, and lateral margins of the specimen.

[1]  K. Mathews,et al.  Effect of feline skin specimen preparation on postexcision and postfixation tissue shrinkage , 2016, Journal of feline medicine and surgery.

[2]  K. Mathews,et al.  Surgically planned versus histologically measured lateral tumor margins for resection of cutaneous and subcutaneous mast cell tumors in dogs: 46 cases (2010-2013). , 2015, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[3]  Jamie R Wignall,et al.  Effects of sample site and size, skin tension lines, surgeon, and formalin fixation on shrinkage of skin samples excised from canine cadavers. , 2014, American journal of veterinary research.

[4]  M. Dark,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of formalin fixation on skin specimens in dogs and cats , 2014, PeerJ.

[5]  S. Twardziok,et al.  Porcine Intestinal Mast Cells. Evaluation of Different Fixatives for Histochemical Staining Techniques Considering Tissue Shrinkage , 2013, European journal of histochemistry : EJH.

[6]  R. Jiang,et al.  Shrinkage of head and neck cancer specimens after formalin fixation , 2012, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA.

[7]  A. Gruber,et al.  Recommended Guidelines for Submission, Trimming, Margin Evaluation, and Reporting of Tumor Biopsy Specimens in Veterinary Surgical Pathology , 2011, Veterinary pathology.

[8]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Effect of tissue shrinkage on histological tumour‐free margin after excision of basal cell carcinoma , 2010, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  N. Brousse,et al.  Shrinkage of skin excision specimens: formalin fixation is not the culprit , 2009, The British journal of dermatology.

[10]  T. Olsen,et al.  Shrinkage of cutaneous specimens: formalin or other factors involved? , 2008, Journal of cutaneous pathology.

[11]  Manjit Singh,et al.  Specimen shrinkage and its influence on margin assessment in breast cancer. , 2007, Asian journal of surgery.

[12]  B. Séguin,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of routine histologic processing on the size of skin samples obtained from dogs. , 2005, American journal of veterinary research.

[13]  E. Rutherford,et al.  The measurement of liver resection margins. , 2004, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[14]  R A Robinson,et al.  Quantification of surgical margin shrinkage in the oral cavity , 1997, Head & neck.

[15]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Relation between size of skin excision, wound, and specimen. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[16]  A. Kopf,et al.  Verification of a formula for determination of preexcision surgical margins from fixed-tissue melanoma specimens. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[17]  C. Grin,et al.  Determination of Preexcision Surgical Margins of Melanomas from Fixed‐Tissue Specimens , 1991, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  D. Irwin Tension lines in the skin of the dog. , 1966, Journal of Small Animal Practice.