Monitoring of stress corrosion cracking in stainless steel weldments by acoustic and electrochemical measurements

A new hybrid monitoring technique for chloride stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is proposed. It uses both the acoustic emission (AE) and corrosion potential fluctuation (CPF) techniques. This paper discusses the results of SCC tests on butt-welded Type 304 stainless steel pipes. The weld pipe suffered transgranular (TG)-SCC in a concentrated magnesium chloride solution (40 mass%), but suffered intergranular (IG) attack and falling-off of grains in a heat-affected zone (HAZ) in a dilute chloride solution (35 mass%). SCC initiations in both concentrated and dilute corrodants were successfully monitored using a CPF technique. However, the CPF technique could not monitor the propagation of the SCC. This propagation could be detected using an AE technique. Secondary AE was produced by hydrogen gas evolution and by the cracking of corrosion products, and the primary AE was produced by the falling-off of grains due to the mutual actions of anodic dissolution and the mechanical fracture along a chromium-depleted zone in the grain boundary. The volume of metal loss by the dissolution was predicted from the local anodic current due to the fluctuation of the corrosion potential, and was found to correspond to the volume of the grain boundary attack. The fact that the primary AE was detected just after rapid drop (RD)-type CPF suggested that the grain boundary corrosion caused the falling-off of the grain that produced the primary AE.

[1]  Hideo Cho,et al.  Simultaneous Monitoring of Acoustic Emission and Corrosion Potential Fluctuation for Mechanistic Study of Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking , 2006 .

[2]  Hideo Cho,et al.  Detection of Stress Corrosion Cracking of Type 304 Stainless Steel Using Acoustic Emission and Corrosion Potential Fluctuation , 2006 .

[3]  Shōichi Satō,et al.  Detection of External Stress Corrosion Cracking by Acoustic Emission , 2005 .

[4]  T. Fukuda,et al.  Evaluation of SCC Morphology on L-grade Stainless Steels in BWRs , 2004 .

[5]  Hideo Cho,et al.  ACOUSTIC EMISSION FROM RUST IN STRESS CORROSION CRACKING , 2004 .

[6]  H. Inoue.  A Grounding in Electrochemical Noise Measurement , 2003 .

[7]  Kazimierz Darowicki,et al.  Investigation of pitting corrosion of stainless steel by means of acoustic emission and potentiodynamic methods , 2003 .

[8]  H. Yamada,et al.  Lamb wave source location of impact on anisotropic plate , 2000 .

[9]  Y. Yoneda,et al.  The Estimation of Local Anodic Current by the Reverse Application of the Corrosion Potential Fluctuations , 1996 .

[10]  M. Takemota.  Stress corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steel. Effect of environmental conditions on crack propagation , 1982 .

[11]  H. Tamura,et al.  Transition of Cracking Mechanisms from Active Path Corrosion to Hydrogen Embrittlement in High Strength Steels in a Boiling Nitrate Solution , 1976 .

[12]  H. Tamura,et al.  Application of Acoustic Emission Technique to the Study of Stress Corrosion Cracking in Distinguishing Between Active Path Corrosion and Hydrogen Embrittlement , 1974 .