Electrocoagulation as a tertiary treatment for paper mill wastewater: Removal of non-biodegradable organic pollution and arsenic

Abstract The tertiary treatment of paper mill wastewaters was investigated by testing the effect of batch electrocoagulation for 90 min with two parallel iron or aluminum plates at two values of the current density (100 and 150 A/m 2 ). Dissolved organic carbon removal ranged between 24% and 46%, and chemical oxygen demand removal ranged between 32% and 68%. UV–visible spectroscopy showed a reduction of the aromaticity of the treated effluent. The process was also very efficient for the removal of lignin-based pollution, characterized by the fluorescence of humic substances. Arsenic was selected as an example of a non-organic micropollutant and was also satisfactorily removed (from 4 to 0.5 μg/L). The settling characteristics of the sludge obtained after the electrocoagulation treatment were also evaluated. The sludge aptitude to settling is better with Fe electrodes than with Al electrodes. The experimental results obtained in the present study indicate that electrocoagulation treatment can be very effective and was capable of improving the paper mill wastewaters’ quality downstream of the biological treatment.

[1]  Hassan Pahlavanzadeh,et al.  Influence of different combinations of aluminum and iron electrode on electrocoagulation efficiency: Application to the treatment of paper mill wastewater , 2011 .

[2]  É. Parlanti,et al.  Fluorescence fingerprint of fulvic and humic acids from varied origins as viewed by single-scan and excitation/emission matrix techniques. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[3]  M. Sillanpää,et al.  Removal of recalcitrant contaminants from bleaching effluents in pulp and paper mills using ultrasonic irradiation and Fenton-like oxidation, electrochemical treatment, and/or chemical precipitation: A comparative study , 2010 .

[4]  Thomas W. Chapman,et al.  Industrial wastewaters treated by electrocoagulation , 2010 .

[5]  C. Montero-Ocampo,et al.  Energy and electrode consumption analysis of electrocoagulation for the removal of arsenic from underground water. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[6]  S. Peters,et al.  Arsenic in groundwaters in the Northern Appalachian Mountain belt: a review of patterns and processes. , 2008, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[7]  A. Gürses,et al.  The removal of lignin and phenol from paper mill effluents by electrocoagulation. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  H. K. Hansen,et al.  Electrocoagulation as a remediation tool for wastewaters containing arsenic , 2006 .

[9]  Z. Aksu,et al.  Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in a continuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curves , 2004 .

[10]  I. Linares-Hernández,et al.  Influence of the anodic material on electrocoagulation performance , 2009 .

[11]  M Y Mollah,et al.  Electrocoagulation (EC)--science and applications. , 2001, Journal of hazardous materials.

[12]  K. Pihlaja,et al.  Characterization, differentiation and classification of aquatic humic matter separated with different sorbents: synchronous scanning fluorescence spectroscopy. , 2002, Water research.

[13]  M. Drikas,et al.  Long term case study of MIEX pre-treatment in drinking water; understanding NOM removal. , 2011, Water research.

[14]  F. Lapicque,et al.  Treatment of the industrial wastewaters by electrocoagulation: optimization of coupled electrochemical and sedimentation processes. , 2010 .

[15]  E. Vorobiev,et al.  Floc size estimation in iron induced electrocoagulation and coagulation using sedimentation data , 2003 .

[16]  Mali Hunsom,et al.  Remediation of wastewater from pulp and paper mill industry by the electrochemical technique , 2009 .

[17]  Mehmet Kesmez,et al.  Arsenic removal by electrocoagulation using combined Al-Fe electrode system and characterization of products. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[18]  Miroslav Mrkva,et al.  Evaluation of correlations between absorbance at 254 nm and COD of river waters , 1983 .

[19]  A. Baker.  Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix characterization of river waters impacted by a tissue mill effluent. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Geoffrey W. Barton,et al.  A quantitative comparison between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation , 2002 .

[21]  C. Barrera-Díaz,et al.  Treatment of industrial effluents by a continuous system: electrocoagulation--activated sludge. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[22]  M. Pons,et al.  Arsenic mass balance in a paper mill and impact of the arsenic release from the WWTP effluent on the Moselle River. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[23]  N. Amin,et al.  Treatment of paper mill effluents in a batch-stirred electrochemical tank reactor , 2009 .

[24]  A. S. Koparal,et al.  Electrocoagulation of vegetable oil refinery wastewater using aluminum electrodes. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  M. Pons,et al.  Automated monitoring of activated sludge in a pilot plant using image analysis. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[26]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the Pulp and Paper Industry: An ENERGY STAR® Guide for Energy and Plant Managers , 2009 .

[27]  M. Sillanpää,et al.  Distribution and transportation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid in lake water and sediment , 1997 .

[28]  J. Nozaki,et al.  The effect of operational parameters on electrocoagulation-flotation process followed by photocatalysis applied to the decontamination of water effluents from cellulose and paper factories. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[29]  F. Lapicque,et al.  Treatment of the textile wastewaters by electrocoagulation: Effect of operating parameters on the sludge settling characteristics , 2009 .

[30]  M. Walker,et al.  Arsenic, As((III)), and tungsten in Nevada County's private water supplies. , 2009, Journal of water and health.

[31]  B. Merzouk,et al.  Removal turbidity and separation of heavy metals using electrocoagulation-electroflotation technique A case study. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[32]  Bhaskar Das,et al.  Status of groundwater arsenic contamination in the state of West Bengal, India: a 20-year study report. , 2009, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[33]  K. Pihlaja,et al.  Molecular size distribution and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances , 1997 .

[34]  G Thompson,et al.  The treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent: a review. , 2001, Bioresource technology.

[35]  F. Lapicque,et al.  Electrocoagulation for the treatment of textile wastewaters with Al or Fe electrodes: compared variations of COD levels, turbidity and absorbance. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[36]  K. Sundararajan,et al.  Correction for quenching in fluorimetric determinations using steady state fluorescence. , 2000, Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy.

[37]  P. Hudak.  Distribution of arsenic concentrations in groundwater of the Seymour Aquifer, Texas, USA , 2008, International journal of environmental health research.

[38]  Monique G Dubé,et al.  Altered reproduction in fish exposed to pulp and paper mill effluents: Roles of individual compounds and mill operating conditions , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[39]  F. Lapicque,et al.  Removal of hexavalent chromium from industrial wastewater by electrocoagulation: A comprehensive comparison of aluminium and iron electrodes , 2009 .

[40]  G. Leslie,et al.  Comparison of treatment options for removal of recalcitrant dissolved organic matter from paper mill effluent. , 2010, Chemosphere.