Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels.

Histologic and radiographic observations suggest that a biologic dimension of hard and soft tissues exists around dental implants and extends apically from the implant-abutment interface. Radiographic evidence of the development of the biologic dimension can be demonstrated by the vertical repositioning of crestal bone and the subsequent soft tissue attachment to the implant that occurs when an implant is uncovered and exposed to the oral environment and matching-diameter restorative components are attached. Historically, two-piece dental implant systems have been restored with prosthetic components that locate the interface between the implant and the attached component element at the outer edge of the implant platform. In 1991, Implant Innovations introduced wide-diameter implants with matching wide-diameter platforms. When introduced, however, matching-diameter prosthetic components were not available, and many of the early 5.0- and 6.0-mm-wide implants received "standard"-diameter (4.1-mm) healing abutments and were restored with "standard"-diameter (4.1-mm) prosthetic components. Long-term radiographic follow-up of these "platform-switched" restored wide-diameter dental implants has demonstrated a smaller than expected vertical change in the crestal bone height around these implants than is typically observed around implants restored conventionally with prosthetic components of matching diameters. This radiographic observation suggests that the resulting postrestorative biologic process resulting in the loss of crestal bone height is altered when the outer edge of the implant-abutment interface is horizontally repositioned inwardly and away from the outer edge of the implant platform. This article introduces the concept of platform switching and provides a foundation for future development of the biologic understanding of the observed radiographic findings and clinical rationale for this technique.

[1]  George A. Zarb,et al.  Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. , 1989 .

[2]  D Buser,et al.  Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[3]  J. Lindhe,et al.  The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[4]  D. Cochran,et al.  Biologic Width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Soft tissue response to plaque formation at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  D Buser,et al.  Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements. , 2001, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  I. Rhyu,et al.  Formation of the biologic width following crown lengthening in nonhuman primates. , 1999, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[8]  D. Cochran,et al.  Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[9]  D Buser,et al.  Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. , 2001, Journal of periodontology.

[10]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. , 1996, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[12]  J. Waerhaug Subgingival plaque and loss of attachment in periodontosis as evaluated on extracted teeth. , 1977, Journal of periodontology.

[13]  S. Nyman,et al.  Histometric evaluation of periodontal surgery. III. The effect of bone resection on the connective tissue attachment level. , 1981, Journal of periodontology.

[14]  R M Pilliar,et al.  Dental implant design--effect on bone remodeling. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[16]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: a retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[17]  G Zarb,et al.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. , 1986, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.