Most of the measurement strategies that are suggested at the international level to assess workplace exposure to nanomaterials rely on devices measuring, in real time, airborne particles concentrations (according different metrics). Since none of the instruments to measure aerosols can distinguish a particle of interest to the background aerosol, the statistical analysis of time resolved data requires special attention. So far, very few approaches have been used for statistical analysis in the literature. This ranges from simple qualitative analysis of graphs to the implementation of more complex statistical models. To date, there is still no consensus on a particular approach and the current period is always looking for an appropriate and robust method. In this context, this exploratory study investigates a statistical method to analyse time resolved data based on a Bayesian probabilistic approach. To investigate and illustrate the use of the this statistical method, particle number concentration data from a workplace study that investigated the potential for exposure via inhalation from cleanout operations by sandpapering of a reactor producing nanocomposite thin films have been used. In this workplace study, the background issue has been addressed through the near-field and far-field approaches and several size integrated and time resolved devices have been used. The analysis of the results presented here focuses only on data obtained with two handheld condensation particle counters. While one was measuring at the source of the released particles, the other one was measuring in parallel far-field. The Bayesian probabilistic approach allows a probabilistic modelling of data series, and the observed task is modelled in the form of probability distributions. The probability distributions issuing from time resolved data obtained at the source can be compared with the probability distributions issuing from the time resolved data obtained far-field, leading in a quantitative estimation of the airborne particles released at the source when the task is performed. Beyond obtained results, this exploratory study indicates that the analysis of the results requires specific experience in statistics.
[1]
Wouter Fransman,et al.
How to statistically analyze nano exposure measurement results: using an ARIMA time series approach
,
2011
.
[2]
Andrew Thomas,et al.
The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions
,
2009,
Statistics in medicine.
[3]
Kevin H. Dunn,et al.
Aerosol Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production: Mobile Direct-Reading Sampling
,
2010,
The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[4]
Derk H Brouwer,et al.
Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies.
,
2004,
The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[5]
Delphine Bard,et al.
From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects
,
2009
.
[6]
Charles L Geraci,et al.
A Strategy for Assessing Workplace Exposures to Nanomaterials
,
2011,
Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.
[7]
Stefanie Hellweg,et al.
Exposure to manufactured nanostructured particles in an industrial pilot plant.
,
2008,
The Annals of occupational hygiene.