A nomogram to predict unfavourable outcome in patients receiving oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation after stroke

Introduction It is unknown whether the type of treatment (direct oral anticoagulant versus vitamin K antagonist) and the time of treatment introduction (early versus late) may affect the functional outcome in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram model including direct oral anticoagulant/vitamin K antagonist and early/late oral anticoagulant introduction for predicting the probability of unfavourable outcome after stroke in atrial fibrillation-patients. Patients and Methods We conducted an individual patient data analysis of four prospective studies. Unfavourable functional outcome was defined as three-month modified Rankin Scale score 3 -6. To generate the nomogram, five independent predictors including age (<65 years, reference; 65--79; or 80), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (0--5 points, reference; 6--15; 16--25; or >25), acute revascularisation treatments (yes, reference, or no), direct oral anticoagulant (reference) or vitamin K antagonist, and early (7 days, reference) or late (8--30) anticoagulant introduction entered into a final logistic regression model. The discriminative performance of the model was assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results A total of 2102 patients with complete data for generating the nomogram was randomly dichotomised into training (n = 1553) and test (n = 549) sets. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.822 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.800--0.844) in the training set and 0.803 (95% CI: 0.764--0.842) in the test set. The model was adequately calibrated (9.852; p = 0.276 for the Hosmer--Lemeshow test). Discussion and Conclusion Our nomogram is the first model including type of oral anticoagulant and time of treatment introduction to predict the probability of three-month unfavourable outcome in a large multicentre cohort of stroke patients with atrial fibrillation.

[1]  M. Cosottini,et al.  IER-START nomogram for prediction of three-month unfavorable outcome after thrombectomy for stroke , 2020, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[2]  D. Werring,et al.  Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists after recent ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation , 2019, Annals of neurology.

[3]  D. Werring,et al.  Antithrombotic treatment for secondary prevention of stroke and other thromboembolic events in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack and non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A European Stroke Organisation guideline , 2019, European stroke journal.

[4]  S. Warach,et al.  Timing of anticoagulation after recent ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation , 2019, The Lancet Neurology.

[5]  A. Camm,et al.  The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2018, European heart journal.

[6]  G. Lippi,et al.  The START nomogram for individualized prediction of the probability of unfavorable outcome after intravenous thrombolysis for stroke , 2018, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[7]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials , 2016, The Lancet.

[8]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2014 .

[9]  J. Grotta,et al.  THRIVE Score Predicts Ischemic Stroke Outcomes and Thrombolytic Hemorrhage Risk in VISTA , 2022 .

[10]  E. Antman,et al.  Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  S. Johnston,et al.  Stroke Prognostication using Age and NIH Stroke Scale , 2013, Neurology.

[12]  K. Vemmos,et al.  An integer-based score to predict functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke , 2012, Neurology.

[13]  Peter Austin,et al.  The iScore Predicts Effectiveness of Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2012, Stroke.

[14]  M. Kaste,et al.  Predicting outcome of IV thrombolysis–treated ischemic stroke patients , 2012, Neurology.

[15]  D. Atar,et al.  Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Sumit R. Majumdar,et al.  Admission Hyperglycemia Predicts a Worse Outcome in Stroke Patients Treated With Intravenous Thrombolysis , 2008, Diabetes Care.