Feasibility study of PRA for critical infrastructure risk analysis

Abstract Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) has been commonly used by NASA and the nuclear power industry to assess risk since the 1970s. However, PRA is not commonly used to assess risk in networked infrastructure systems such as water, sewer and power systems. Other methods which utilise network models of infrastructure such as random and targeted attack failure analysis, N-k analysis and statistical learning theory are instead used to analyse system performance when a disruption occurs. Such methods have the advantage of being simpler to implement than PRA. This paper explores the feasibility of a full PRA of infrastructure, that is one that analyses all possible scenarios as well as the associated likelihoods and consequences. Such analysis is resource intensive and quickly becomes complex for even small systems. Comparing the previously mentioned more commonly used methods to PRA provides insight into how current practises can be improved, bringing the results closer to those that would be presented from PRA. Although a full PRA of infrastructure systems may not be feasible, PRA should not be discarded. Instead, analysis of such systems should be carried out using the framework of PRA to include vital elements such as scenario likelihood analysis which are often overlooked.

[1]  R. Rota,et al.  Quantitative Risk Analysis , 2013 .

[2]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment Methodology for Swiss Road Network , 2009 .

[3]  Rachid Cherkaoui,et al.  Blackouts risk evaluation by Monte Carlo Simulation regarding cascading outages and system frequency deviation , 2012 .

[4]  Min Ouyang,et al.  Multi-dimensional hurricane resilience assessment of electric power systems , 2014 .

[5]  Seth D. Guikema,et al.  Virtual cities for water distribution and infrastructure system research , 2007 .

[6]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[7]  T. Aven,et al.  How to define and interpret a probability in a risk and safety setting , 2013 .

[8]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Relationships between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California , 1999 .

[9]  Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  On “Black Swans” and “Perfect Storms”: Risk Analysis and Management When Statistics Are Not Enough , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Lars Rosén,et al.  Fault tree analysis for integrated and probabilistic risk analysis of drinking water systems. , 2009, Water research.

[11]  Eugenio Gutiérrez,et al.  Seismic risk assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure systems: The case of European gas and electricity networks , 2012 .

[12]  M.T. Schilling,et al.  Reliability Assessment of the Brazilian Power System Using Enumeration and Monte Carlo , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Wenyuan Li,et al.  Risk Assessment Of Power Systems: Models, Methods, and Applications , 2004 .

[14]  Alyson G. Wilson,et al.  Probability, chance and the probability of chance , 2008 .

[15]  A. Kiureghian Non‐ergodicity and PEER's framework formula , 2005 .

[16]  Reuven Cohen,et al.  Stability and topology of scale-free networks under attack and defense strategies. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[17]  A. Motter,et al.  Fluctuation-driven capacity distribution in complex networks , 2008, 0805.3725.

[18]  Do Guen Yoo,et al.  Seismic Hazard Assessment Model for Urban Water Supply Networks , 2016 .

[19]  Jonas Johansson,et al.  An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  Min Ouyang,et al.  A methodological approach to analyze vulnerability of interdependent infrastructures , 2009, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[21]  D. Lindley The Philosophy of Statistics , 2000 .

[22]  Elise Miller-Hooks,et al.  Measuring the performance of transportation infrastructure systems in disasters: a comprehensive review , 2015 .

[23]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Probabilistic risk assessment of infrastructure networks subjected to hurricanes , 2015 .

[24]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Systemic seismic risk assessment of road networks in urban areas , 2015 .

[25]  Hiroyuki Mori,et al.  A tabu search based approach to (N-k) static contingency selection in power systems , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[26]  Analytical Foundations of Quantitative Risk Assessment , 2009 .

[28]  Irene Eusgeld,et al.  "System-of-systems" approach for interdependent critical infrastructures , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[30]  George E Apostolakis,et al.  How Useful Is Quantitative Risk Assessment? , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[31]  Bryan W. Karney,et al.  Pressure Standards in Water Distribution Systems: Reflection on Current Practice with Consideration of Some Unresolved Issues , 2016 .

[32]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Percolation of localized attack on complex networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[33]  J.D. McCalley,et al.  Identifying high risk N-k contingencies for online security assessment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[34]  Katherine A. Klise,et al.  A software framework for assessing the resilience of drinking water systems to disasters with an example earthquake case study , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[35]  Zhaohong Bie,et al.  Eliminating Redundant Line Flow Constraints in Composite System Reliability Evaluation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[36]  Seth D. Guikema,et al.  Dependent infrastructure system modeling: A case study of the St. Kitts power and water distribution systems , 2021, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[37]  P. van Gelder,et al.  Quantitative fault tree analysis for urban water infrastructure flooding , 2011 .

[38]  Jacopo Selva,et al.  Long-term multi-risk assessment: statistical treatment of interaction among risks , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[39]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Models for Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of Power Networks: Comparative Assessment , 2014, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[40]  Devika Subramanian,et al.  Performance assessment of topologically diverse power systems subjected to hurricane events , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[41]  Seth D. Guikema,et al.  Characterizing and predicting the robustness of power-law networks , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[42]  Paolo Franchin,et al.  Quantitative assessment of social losses based on physical damage and interaction with infrastructural systems , 2012 .

[43]  T. Bedford,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods , 2001 .

[44]  Min Ouyang,et al.  Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[45]  Rob Lamb,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of the Economic Risk to Britain's Railway Network from Bridge Scour During Floods , 2019, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[46]  Jose M. Arroyo,et al.  Application of a genetic algorithm to n-K power system security assessment , 2013 .

[47]  Darren M. Scott,et al.  Identifying Critical Road Segments and Measuring System-Wide Robustness in Transportation Networks with Isolating Links: A Link-Based Capacity-Reduction Approach , 2010 .

[48]  Paolo Franchin,et al.  Probabilistic Assessment of Civil Infrastructure Resilience to Earthquakes , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[49]  Seth D. Guikema,et al.  Characterising the robustness of coupled power-law networks , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[50]  Seth D. Guikema,et al.  Estimating the spatial distribution of power outages during hurricanes in the Gulf coast region , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[51]  Anton J. Schleiss,et al.  A risk-based multi-level stress test methodology: application to six critical non-nuclear infrastructures in Europe , 2019, Natural Hazards.

[52]  Seth D. Guikema,et al.  Natural disaster risk analysis for critical infrastructure systems: An approach based on statistical learning theory , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..