What makes deal-of-the-day promotions really effective? The interplay of discount and time constraint with product type

Deal-of-the-day (DoD) promotions are nowadays very popular. As a special form of a price promotion, they allow firms to offer products at substantial price discounts, usually at or above 50%, for a very limited period of time, usually between one and seven days. Conventional wisdom suggests that both characteristics, high discount levels and tight time constraints, should make DoDs an effective form of a price promotion. However, the two characteristics do not necessarily combine to increase DoD effectiveness. In particular, the authors propose that depending on the type of a promoted product (utilitarian vs. hedonic), the attention that consumers pay to the discount level relative to the time constraint varies, which leads to differences in promotional effectiveness. Two studies, a lab experiment and a field study using data from the DoD platform Groupon, mostly confirm these hypotheses: the time constraint increases promotional effectiveness more for hedonic than for utilitarian products, whereas the discount level increases promotional effectiveness for utilitarian more than for hedonic products. In the Groupon data, very high discount levels actually decrease promotional effectiveness for hedonic products. The results suggest that designers of DoD promotions should consider the type of a promoted product when choosing appropriate time constraints and discount levels.

[1]  J. Inman,et al.  Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value , 1997 .

[2]  The Effects of Information Processing Modes on Consumers Reactions to Comparative Advertising , 2005 .

[3]  Louise A. Heslop,et al.  Reference Prices and Deception in Newspaper Advertising , 1985 .

[4]  Margo Buchanan-Oliver,et al.  Meaningless or meaningful? Interpretation and intentionality in post‐modern communication , 2004 .

[5]  Of tricks and tumors: Some little‐recognized costs of dishonest use of effective social influence , 1999 .

[6]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Building consumer trust online , 1999, CACM.

[7]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[8]  T. RatchfordB.  New insights about the FCB grid. , 1987 .

[9]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Adaptive Control Processes - A Guided Tour (Reprint from 1961) , 2015, Princeton Legacy Library.

[10]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  10 – Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change1 , 1968 .

[11]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[12]  U. Dholakia,et al.  How Businesses Fare with Daily Deals: A Multi-Site Analysis of Groupon, Livingsocial, Opentable, Travelzoo, and BuyWithMe Promotions , 2011 .

[13]  Harald J. van Heerde,et al.  Semiparametric Analysis to Estimate the Deal Effect Curve , 2001 .

[14]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  New Empirical Generalizations on the Determinants of Price Elasticity , 2005 .

[15]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[16]  Anne L. Roggeveen,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Semantic Price Cues , 2014 .

[17]  Richard A. Briesch,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Price Presentation on Perceived Savings , 2002 .

[18]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[19]  Ruth N. Bolton.  The Relationship Between Market Characteristics and Promotional Price Elasticities , 1989 .

[20]  Andrew McStay.  The Mood of Information: A Critique of Online Behavioural Advertising , 2011 .

[21]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[22]  R. Sethuraman.  A Model of how Discounting High-Priced Brands Affects the Sales of Low-Priced Brands , 1996 .

[23]  Utpal M. Dholakia,et al.  Daily Deal Fatigue or Unabated Enthusiasm? A Study of Consumer Perceptions of Daily Deal Promotions , 2011 .

[24]  K. B. Monroe.  Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Pricing , 1984 .

[25]  E. Berkowitz,et al.  Contextual Influences on Consumer Price Responses: An Experimental Analysis , 1980 .

[26]  S. Wood.  Low‐Rank Scale‐Invariant Tensor Product Smooths for Generalized Additive Mixed Models , 2006, Biometrics.

[27]  Alexander Chernev,et al.  Low Prices are Just the Beginning: Price Image in Retail Management , 2013 .

[28]  Edward Blair,et al.  The Effects of Reference Prices in Retail Advertisements , 1981 .

[29]  B. S. Ong.  Attitudes, Perceptions, and Responses of Purchasers Versus Subscribers-Only for Daily Deals on Hospitality Products , 2015 .

[30]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[31]  Amit Sharma,et al.  Communicating Price Information through Semantic Cues: The Moderating Effects of Situation and Discount Size , 1996 .

[32]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Promotion Signal: Proxy for a Price Cut? , 1990 .

[33]  V. Kumar,et al.  Social coupons as a marketing strategy: a multifaceted perspective , 2012 .

[34]  Pierre Chandon,et al.  A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness , 2000 .

[35]  Els Gijsbrechts,et al.  Prices and pricing research in consumer marketing: Some recent developments , 1993 .

[36]  V. Zeithaml.  Issues in Conceptualizing and Measuring Consumer Response to Price , 1984 .

[37]  A. Samson,et al.  Two minds, three ways: dual system and dual process models in consumer psychology , 2012 .

[38]  Robert P. Leone,et al.  Measuring the Effect of Retail Store Promotions on Brand and Store Substitution , 1988 .

[39]  Feng Shen.  Information congruity in scarcity appeal: A structural equation modeling study of time-limited promotions , 2016 .

[40]  Donnavieve N. Smith,et al.  Online Peer and Editorial Recommendations, Trust, and Choice in Virtual Markets , 2005 .

[41]  Martin Natter,et al.  A comparison of different pay-per-bid auction formats , 2014 .

[42]  Utpal M. Dholakia.  How Businesses Fare with Daily Deals as They Gain Experience: A Multi-Time Period Study of Daily Deal Performance , 2012 .

[43]  Peter T. L. Popkowski Leszczyc,et al.  Market share response and competitive interaction: The impact of temporary, evolving and structural changes in prices , 2000 .

[44]  M. Lynn.  Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature , 1991 .

[45]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  A behavioral decision theory perspective on hedonic and utilitarian choice , 2005 .

[46]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study , 1993 .

[47]  Debora Viana Thompson,et al.  The Effects of Information Processing Mode on Consumers' Responses to Comparative Advertising , 2006 .

[48]  R. Bellman,et al.  V. Adaptive Control Processes , 1964 .

[49]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations , 1998 .

[50]  Praveen Aggarwal,et al.  Use it or lose it: purchase acceleration effects of time‐limited promotions , 2003 .

[51]  Georgios Zervas,et al.  Daily deals: prediction, social diffusion, and reputational ramifications , 2011, WSDM '12.

[52]  K. B. Monroe,et al.  Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisements , 1981 .

[53]  Lee G. Cooper,et al.  The Discounting of Discounts and Promotion Thresholds , 1992 .

[54]  U. Dholakia,et al.  What Makes Groupon Promotions Profitable for Businesses? , 2011 .

[55]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  Consumer Buying Behavior on the Internet: Findings from Panel Data , 2000 .

[56]  Chin-Wan Chung,et al.  When daily deal services meet Twitter: understanding Twitter as a daily deal marketing platform , 2012, WebSci '12.

[57]  Franziska Völckner,et al.  The price-perceived quality relationship: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its determinants , 2007 .

[58]  S. Wood.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R , 2006 .

[59]  Robert Folger,et al.  On Wanting What We Do Not Have , 1992 .

[60]  Mary F. Mobley,et al.  An Investigation of Individual Responses to Tensile Price Claims , 1988 .

[61]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[62]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[63]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[64]  Utpal M. Dholakia,et al.  A Critical Review of Question-Behavior Effect Research , 2009 .